Articles | Volume 2, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-39-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-39-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
24 Jan 2019
Research article |
| 24 Jan 2019
| 24 Jan 2019
Building bridges between experts and the public: a comparison of two-way communication formats for flooding and air pollution risk
Maria Loroño-Leturiondo
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan
University, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK
Paul O'Hare
School of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan
University, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK
Simon J. Cook
Geography, School of Social Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee,
DD1 4HN, UK
Stephen R. Hoon
School of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan
University, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK
Sam Illingworth
School of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan
University, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK
Related authors
Maria Loroño-Leturiondo, Paul O'Hare, Simon Cook, Stephen R. Hoon, and Sam Illingworth
Adv. Sci. Res., 15, 45–50, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-45-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-45-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Globally we are facing both an air quality crisis and a communication emergency. Communication efforts so far have been based on a one-way provision of information from experts to society, and have arguably failed in their mission to foster a more engaged society, or to result in cleaner air. This paper supports the case for moving away from one-way communication, and identifies five benefits of a practical two-way communication between experts and citizens in order to engender positive change.
Shahzad Gani, Louise Arnal, Lucy Beattie, John Hillier, Sam Illingworth, Tiziana Lanza, Solmaz Mohadjer, Karoliina Pulkkinen, Heidi Roop, Iain Stewart, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, and Stephanie Zihms
Geosci. Commun., 7, 251–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Science communication in geosciences has societal and scientific value but often operates in “shadowlands”. This editorial highlights these issues and proposes potential solutions. Our objective is to create a transparent and responsible geoscience communication landscape, fostering scientific progress, the well-being of scientists, and societal benefits.
Adam Emmer, Oscar Vilca, Cesar Salazar Checa, Sihan Li, Simon Cook, Elena Pummer, Jan Hrebrina, and Wilfried Haeberli
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2316, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2316, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We report in detail the most recent large landslide-triggered glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) in the Peruvian Andes (the 2023 Rasac GLOF), analyze its preconditions, consequences, and the role of changing climate. Our study contibutes to understanding GLOF occurrence patterns in space and time and corroborates increasing frequency of such events in changing mountains.
Minja Sillanpää, AnaCapri Mauro, Minttu Hänninen, Sam Illingworth, and Mo Hamza
Geosci. Commun., 7, 167–193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-167-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-167-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Minions of Disruptions is a climate change game designed as a communication tool for groups that do not regularly engage with the topic. In our research, we find that the game is liked by the general public because it encourages collective action. This is important because most local climate challenges can only be solved by groups and because gameplay can increase collaboration. The results of this study may be used to develop communication tools that better consider the needs of the audiences.
Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 6, 131–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-131-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-131-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this article, I explore the various ways the geosciences can be communicated to a wider audience. I focus on creative methods that range from sharing information to involving the public in the research process. By using examples from my own work and the wider literature, I demonstrate how these approaches can engage diverse communities and promote greater recognition for geoscience communication.
Caitlyn A. Hall, Sam Illingworth, Solmaz Mohadjer, Mathew Koll Roxy, Craig Poku, Frederick Otu-Larbi, Darryl Reano, Mara Freilich, Maria-Luisa Veisaga, Miguel Valencia, and Joey Morales
Geosci. Commun., 5, 275–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-275-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-275-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this manifesto, we offer six points of reflection that higher education geoscience educators can act upon to recognise and unlearn their biases and diversify the geosciences in higher education, complementing current calls for institutional and organisational change. This serves as a starting point to gather momentum to establish community-built opportunities for implementing and strengthening diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice holistically in geoscience education.
Adam Emmer, Simon K. Allen, Mark Carey, Holger Frey, Christian Huggel, Oliver Korup, Martin Mergili, Ashim Sattar, Georg Veh, Thomas Y. Chen, Simon J. Cook, Mariana Correas-Gonzalez, Soumik Das, Alejandro Diaz Moreno, Fabian Drenkhan, Melanie Fischer, Walter W. Immerzeel, Eñaut Izagirre, Ramesh Chandra Joshi, Ioannis Kougkoulos, Riamsara Kuyakanon Knapp, Dongfeng Li, Ulfat Majeed, Stephanie Matti, Holly Moulton, Faezeh Nick, Valentine Piroton, Irfan Rashid, Masoom Reza, Anderson Ribeiro de Figueiredo, Christian Riveros, Finu Shrestha, Milan Shrestha, Jakob Steiner, Noah Walker-Crawford, Joanne L. Wood, and Jacob C. Yde
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3041–3061, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3041-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3041-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) have attracted increased research attention recently. In this work, we review GLOF research papers published between 2017 and 2021 and complement the analysis with research community insights gained from the 2021 GLOF conference we organized. The transdisciplinary character of the conference together with broad geographical coverage allowed us to identify progress, trends and challenges in GLOF research and outline future research needs and directions.
Alice Wardle and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 5, 221–225, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-221-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-221-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Participants answered four questions concerning their experience writing a haiku based on a geoscience extract. Data were categorised as being part of the
Task Processor
Task Meaning. The themes involved in the
Task Processwere
Identification of significant information,
Distillation of informationand
Metamorphosis of text, while the themes related to
Task Meaningwere made up of
Enjoyable,
Challenging(which has sub-themes
Frustratingand
Restricted) and
Valuable.
John K. Hillier, Katharine E. Welsh, Mathew Stiller-Reeve, Rebecca K. Priestley, Heidi A. Roop, Tiziana Lanza, and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 4, 493–506, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this editorial we expand upon the brief advice in the first editorial of Geoscience Communication (Illingworth et al., 2018), illustrating what constitutes robust and publishable work for this journal and elucidating its key elements. Our aim is to help geoscience communicators plan a route to publication and to illustrate how good engagement work that is already being done might be developed into publishable research.
Hazel Gibson, Sam Illingworth, and Susanne Buiter
Geosci. Commun., 4, 437–451, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-437-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-437-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In the spring of 2020, in response to the escalating global COVID-19 Coronavirus pandemic, the European Geosciences Union (EGU) moved its annual General Assembly online in a matter of weeks. This paper explores the feedback provided by participants who attended this experimental conference and identifies four key themes that emerged from analysis of the survey (connection, engagement, environment, and accessibility). The responses raise important questions about the format of future conferences.
Arianna Soldati and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 3, 73–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-73-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-73-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we investigate what poetry written about volcanoes from the 1800s to the present day reveals about the relationship between humanity and volcanoes, including how it evolved over that time frame. This analysis reveals that the human–volcano relationship is especially centred around the sense of identity that volcanoes provide to humans, which may follow from both positive and negative events, and has a spiritual element to it.
Jonathan P. Tennant, Sam Illingworth, Iain Stewart, and Kirsten von Elverfeldt
Geosci. Commun., 3, 71–72, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-71-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-71-2020, 2020
Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 3, 35–47, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-35-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-35-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
To many non-specialists, the science behind climate change can appear confusing and alienating, yet in order for global mitigation efforts to be successful it is not just scientists who need to take action, but rather society as a whole. This study shows how poets and poetry offer a method of communicating the science of climate change to the wider society
using language that they not only better understand, but which also has the potential to stimulate accountability and inspire action.
Rolf Hut, Casper Albers, Sam Illingworth, and Chris Skinner
Geosci. Commun., 2, 117–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-117-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-117-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Game worlds in modern computer games, while they include very Earth-like landscapes, are ultimately fake. Since games can be used for learning, we wondered if people pick up wrong information from games. Using a survey we tested if people with a background in geoscience are better than people without such a background at distinguishing if game landscapes are realistic. We found that geoscientists are significantly better at this, but the difference is small and overall everyone is good at it.
Sam Illingworth, Alice Bell, Stuart Capstick, Adam Corner, Piers Forster, Rosie Leigh, Maria Loroño Leturiondo, Catherine Muller, Harriett Richardson, and Emily Shuckburgh
Geosci. Commun., 1, 9–24, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-9-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-9-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change is real, it is happening now, and it will not be stopped by the sole efforts of scientists. This study shows how poetry and open conversation can be used to develop a dialogue around mitigating climate change with different communities, including faith groups and people living with disabilities. Furthermore, it shows how this dialogue can help us to better understand the opportunities that these communities present in tackling the negative effects of human-made climate change.
Sam Illingworth, Iain Stewart, Jonathan Tennant, and Kirsten von Elverfeldt
Geosci. Commun., 1, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-1-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-1-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Welcome to the journal of Geoscience Communication! We decided to write this editorial in order to introduce ourselves (the executive editors of GC), to provide a history of its development, and to serve as a guideline for future authors who wish to submit to this journal. We hope that this article serves as a useful aid for people who are considering publishing in GC, as well as the wider geoscience community, and that it can act in the first instance as a FAQ for authors, editors, and readers alike.
Maria Loroño-Leturiondo, Paul O'Hare, Simon Cook, Stephen R. Hoon, and Sam Illingworth
Adv. Sci. Res., 15, 45–50, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-45-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-45-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Globally we are facing both an air quality crisis and a communication emergency. Communication efforts so far have been based on a one-way provision of information from experts to society, and have arguably failed in their mission to foster a more engaged society, or to result in cleaner air. This paper supports the case for moving away from one-way communication, and identifies five benefits of a practical two-way communication between experts and citizens in order to engender positive change.
G. Allen, S. M. Illingworth, S. J. O'Shea, S. Newman, A. Vance, S. J.-B. Bauguitte, F. Marenco, J. Kent, K. Bower, M. W. Gallagher, J. Muller, C. J. Percival, C. Harlow, J. Lee, and J. P. Taylor
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4401–4416, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4401-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4401-2014, 2014
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a validated method and data set for new retrievals of trace gas concentrations and temperature from the ARIES infrared spectrometer instrument on the UK Atmospheric Research Aircraft (www.faam.ac.uk). This new capability for the aircraft will allow new science to be done because of the way it can sense information about the atmosphere without having to physically pass through it (remote sensing). This will allow us to better understand the make-up of the lower atmosphere.
S. J. O'Shea, G. Allen, M. W. Gallagher, K. Bower, S. M. Illingworth, J. B. A. Muller, B. T. Jones, C. J. Percival, S. J-B. Bauguitte, M. Cain, N. Warwick, A. Quiquet, U. Skiba, J. Drewer, K. Dinsmore, E. G. Nisbet, D. Lowry, R. E. Fisher, J. L. France, M. Aurela, A. Lohila, G. Hayman, C. George, D. B. Clark, A. J. Manning, A. D. Friend, and J. Pyle
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13159–13174, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13159-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13159-2014, 2014
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents airborne measurements of greenhouse gases collected in the European Arctic. Regional scale flux estimates for the northern Scandinavian wetlands are derived. These fluxes are found to be in excellent agreement with coincident surface measurements within the aircraft's sampling domain. This has allowed a significant low bias to be identified in two commonly used process-based land surface models.
S. M. Illingworth, G. Allen, S. Newman, A. Vance, F. Marenco, R. C. Harlow, J. Taylor, D. P. Moore, and J. J. Remedios
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1133–1150, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1133-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1133-2014, 2014
S. J. O'Shea, G. Allen, M. W. Gallagher, S. J.-B. Bauguitte, S. M. Illingworth, M. Le Breton, J. B. A. Muller, C. J. Percival, A. T. Archibald, D. E. Oram, M. Parrington, P. I. Palmer, and A. C. Lewis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12451–12467, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12451-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12451-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Subject: Geoscience engagement | Keyword: Public communication of science
Designing and evaluating a public engagement activity about sea level rise
Rocks Really Rock: electronic field trips via Web Google Earth can generate positive impacts in attitudes toward Earth sciences in middle- and high-school students
A spectrum of geoscience communication: from dissemination to participation
Understanding representations of uncertainty, an eye-tracking study – Part 1: The effect of anchoring
Understanding representations of uncertainty, an eye-tracking study – Part 2: The effect of expertise
GC Insights: Nature stripes for raising engagement with biodiversity loss
Exploring TikTok as a promising platform for geoscience communication
How to get your message across: designing an impactful knowledge transfer plan in a European project
Magnetic to the Core – communicating palaeomagnetism with hands-on activities
Communicating uncertainties in spatial predictions of grain micronutrient concentration
The Met Office Weather Game: investigating how different methods for presenting probabilistic weather forecasts influence decision-making
The takeover of science communication: how science lost its leading role in the public discourse on carbon capture and storage research in daily newspapers in Germany
Nieske Vergunst, Tugce Varol, and Erik van Sebille
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1649, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1649, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed and evaluated a board game about sea level rise to engage young adults. We found that the game positively influenced participants' perceptions of their impact on sea level rise, regardless of their prior familiarity with science. This study suggests that interactive and relatable activities can effectively engage broader audiences on climate issues, highlighting the potential for similar approaches in public science communication.
Carolina Ortiz-Guerrero and Jamie Loizzo
Geosci. Commun., 7, 101–119, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-101-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-101-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper tackles K-12 Earth science (ES) education challenges, introducing the Rocks Really Rock electronic field trip. Utilizing multimedia and storytelling via Web Google Earth shows a significant positive shift in attitudes towards geology, careers, and literacy. Findings endorse EFT effectiveness, supporting dissemination in schools and homeschooling to enhance ES education.
Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 6, 131–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-131-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-131-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this article, I explore the various ways the geosciences can be communicated to a wider audience. I focus on creative methods that range from sharing information to involving the public in the research process. By using examples from my own work and the wider literature, I demonstrate how these approaches can engage diverse communities and promote greater recognition for geoscience communication.
Kelsey J. Mulder, Louis Williams, Matthew Lickiss, Alison Black, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Rachel McCloy, and Eugene McSorley
Geosci. Commun., 6, 97–110, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-97-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-97-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
It is vital that uncertainty in environmental forecasting is graphically presented to enable people to use and interpret it correctly. Using novel eye-tracking methods, we show that where people look and the decisions they make are both strongly influenced by construction of forecast representations common in presentations of environmental data. This suggests that forecasters should construct their presentations carefully so that they help people to extract important information more easily.
Louis Williams, Kelsey J. Mulder, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Matthew Lickiss, Alison Black, Rachel McCloy, Eugene McSorley, and Joe Young
Geosci. Commun., 6, 111–123, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-111-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-111-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
When constructing graphical environmental forecasts involving uncertainty, it is important to consider the background and expertise of end-users. Using novel eye-tracking methods, we show that where people look and the decisions they make are both strongly influenced by prior expertise and the graphical construction of forecast representations common in presentations of environmental data. We suggest that forecasters should construct their presentations carefully, bearing these factors in mind.
Miles Richardson
Geosci. Commun., 6, 11–14, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-11-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-11-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
There has also been a stark loss of wildlife since 1970, yet climate change receives far greater attention. The
warming stripeshave shown how simple graphics can engage broad audiences. The
nature stripesshow how the loss of wildlife and biodiversity can also be presented in a similar way for positive effects.
Emily E. Zawacki, Wendy Bohon, Scott Johnson, and Donna J. Charlevoix
Geosci. Commun., 5, 363–380, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-363-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-363-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
To determine the best strategies for geoscience communication on TikTok, we created a TikTok account called
Terra Explore. We produced 48 educational geoscience videos and evaluated each video’s performance. Our most-viewed videos received nearly all of their views from TikTok’s algorithmic recommendation feed, and the videos that received the most views were related to a recent newsworthy event (e.g., earthquake) or explained the geology of a recognizable area.
Sara Pasqualetto, Luisa Cristini, and Thomas Jung
Geosci. Commun., 5, 87–100, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-87-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-87-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Many projects in their reporting phase are required to provide a clear plan for evaluating the results of those efforts aimed at translating scientific results to a broader audience. This paper illustrates methodologies and strategies used in the framework of a European research project to assess the impact of knowledge transfer activities, both quantitatively and qualitatively, and provides recommendations and hints for developing a useful impact plan for scientific projects.
Annique van der Boon, Andrew J. Biggin, Greig A. Paterson, and Janine L. Kavanagh
Geosci. Commun., 5, 55–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-55-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-55-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present the Magnetic to the Core project, which communicated palaeomagnetism to members of the general public through hands-on experiments. The impact of the project was tested with an interactive quiz, which shows that this outreach event was successful in impacting visitors’ learning. We hope our Magnetic to the Core project can serve as an inspiration for other Earth science laboratories looking to engage a wide audience and measure the success and impact of their outreach activities.
Christopher Chagumaira, Joseph G. Chimungu, Dawd Gashu, Patson C. Nalivata, Martin R. Broadley, Alice E. Milne, and R. Murray Lark
Geosci. Commun., 4, 245–265, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-245-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-245-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Our study is concerned with how the uncertainty in spatial information about environmental variables can be communicated to stakeholders who must use this information to make decisions. We tested five methods for communicating the uncertainty in spatial predictions by eliciting the opinions of end-users about the usefulness of the methods. End-users preferred methods based on the probability that concentrations are below or above a nutritionally significant threshold.
Elisabeth M. Stephens, David J. Spiegelhalter, Ken Mylne, and Mark Harrison
Geosci. Commun., 2, 101–116, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-101-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-101-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The UK Met Office ran an online game to highlight the best methods of communicating uncertainty in their online forecasts and to widen engagement in probabilistic weather forecasting. The game used a randomized design to test different methods of presenting uncertainty and to enable participants to experience being
luckyor
unluckywhen the most likely scenario did not occur. Over 8000 people played the game; we found players made better decisions when provided with forecast uncertainty.
Simon Schneider
Geosci. Commun., 2, 69–82, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-69-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-69-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
CCS media coverage in Germany was dominated by other stakeholders than science itself. If science will remain a proactive element of science communication, new approaches for future science PR have be deduced. Among these is a more differentiated understanding of target audiences and regional concerns. Furthermore, science communication has to gain a better understanding of sociocultural contexts to become more effective and successful.
Cited articles
Abt, C. C.: Serious Games, UPA, Lanham, 2002.
Al-Saggaf, Y. and Simmons, P.: Social media in Saudi Arabia: Exploring its
use during two natural disasters, Technol. Forecast. Soc., 95, 3–15,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.08.013, 2015.
Amri, A., Bird, D. K., Ronan, K., Haynes, K., and Towers, B.: Disaster risk
reduction education in Indonesia: challenges and recommendations for scaling
up, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 595–612,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-595-2017, 2017.
Aisha, T. S., Wok, S., Manaf, A. M. A., and Ismail, R.: Exploring the Use of
Social Media During the 2014 Flood in Malaysia, Procd. Soc. Behv., 211,
931–937, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.123, 2015.
Arnstein, S. R.: A Ladder of Citizen Participation, JAIP, Vol. 35, No. 4,
216–224, available at:
https://lithgow-schmidt.dk/sherry-arnstein/ladder-of-citizen-participation.html
(last access: 25 September 2017), 1969.
Aubert, A. H., Schnepel, O., Kraft, P., Houska, T., Plesca, I., Orlowski, N.,
and Breuer, L.: Studienlandschaft Schwingbachtal: an out-door full-scale
learning tool newly equipped with augmented reality, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Discuss., 12, 11591–11611, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-12-11591-2015, 2015.
Bickerstaff, K.: Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the
public experience of air pollution, Environ. Int., 30, 827–840,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.001, 2004.
Bickerstaff, K. and Walker, G.: Clearing the smog? Public responses to
air-quality information, Local Environ., 4, 279–294,
https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839908725600, 1999.
Bickerstaff, K. and Walker, G.: Public understandings of air pollution: the
`localisation' of environmental risk, Global Environ. Chang., 11, 133–145,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00063-7, 2001.
Boland, A., Cherry, G., and Dickson, R.: Doing a Systematic Review, 1st Edn.,
Sage Publications Ltd, London, Thousand Oakes, California, 2013.
Bormann, H., Ahlhorn, F., and Klenke, T.: Adaptation of water management to
regional climate change in a coastal region – Hydrological change vs.
community perception and strategies, J. Hydrol., 454–455, 64–75,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.063, 2012.
Bosschaart, A., van der Schee, J., and Kuiper, W.: Designing a flood-risk
education program in the Netherlands, J. Environ. Educ., 47, 271–286,
https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1130013, 2016.
Bowater, L. and Yeoman, K.: Science Communication: A Practical Guide for
Scientists, 1st Edn., Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2012.
Breuer, R., Sewilam, H., Nacken, H., and Pyka, C.: Exploring the application
of a flood risk management Serious Game platform, Environ. Earth Sci., 76,
93, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6387-1, 2017.
Bryman, A.: Social Research Methods, 4th Edn., Oxford University Press,
Oxford, New York, 2012.
Bunce, S., Partridge, H., and Davis, K.: Exploring information experience
using social media during the 2011 Queensland floods: A pilot study, Aust.
Libr. J., 61, 34–45, 2012.
Burningham, K., Fielding, J., and Thrush, D.: “It'll never happen to me”:
understanding public awareness of local flood risk, Disasters, 32, 216–238,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01036.x, 2008.
Butler, C. and Pidgeon, N.: From “Flood Defence” to “Flood Risk
Management”: Exploring Governance, Responsibility, and Blame, Environ.
Plann. C, 29, 533–547, https://doi.org/10.1068/c09181j, 2011.
Committee on Climate Change: UK Climate Change Risk Assessment 2017 Synthesis
Report: priorities for the next five years, Adaptation Sub-Committee of the
Committee on Climate Change, London, 2016.
Davies, S. R.: Knowing and Loving: Public Engagement beyond Discourse, Sci.
Technol. Stud., 27, available at:
https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/55316 (last
access: 3 November 2016), 2014.
DeForest Hauser, C., Buckley, A., and Porter, J.: Passive samplers and
community science in regional air quality measurement, education and
communication, Environ. Pollut., 203, 243–249,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.12.028, 2015.
Demir, I.: Interactive web-based hydrological simulation system as an
education platform, Vol. 2, 910–912, available at:
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84911906678&partnerID=40&md5=793c587b9bb38747febe036436bb35dc
(last access: 9 May 2017), 2014.
Elnokaly, A., Elseragy, A., and Elgebaly, I.: Engaging architects and
architectural students in global warming awareness, available at:
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84928436270&partnerID=40&md5=717fd1e9c9553a8df386bbb955d08c4d
(last access: 25 May 2017), 2008.
Environment Agency: Lessons learned: Autumn 2000 floods, Environment Agency,
Bristol, 2001.
Fedorenko, I. and Sun, Y.: Microblogging-Based Civic Participation on
Environment in China: A Case Study of the PM2.5 Campaign, Voluntas, 27,
2077–2105, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9591-1, 2016.
Felicio, S. P. A. S., Silva, V. S. R., Dargains, A. R., Souza, P. R. A.,
Sampaio, F., Carvalho, P. V. R., Gomes, J. O., and Borges, M. R. S.: Stop
disasters game experiment with elementary school students in Rio de Janeiro:
Building safety culture, 585–591, available at:
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84905841714&partnerID=40&md5=929004775d6b684df4a33f4225123680
(last access: 3 May 2017), 2014.
Fohringer, J., Dransch, D., Kreibich, H., and Schröter, K.: Social media
as an information source for rapid flood inundation mapping, Nat. Hazards
Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2725–2738, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2725-2015,
2015.
Ford, J. D., Berrang-Ford, L., and Paterson, J.: A systematic review of
observed climate change adaptation in developed nations, Climatic Change,
106, 327–336, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0045-5, 2011.
Fritze, H. and Kray, C.: Community and governmental responses to an urban
flashflood, Proceedings of the ISCRAM 2015 Conference, Kristiansand, Norway,
2015.
Goodwin, J. and Dahlstrom, M. F.: Communication strategies for earning trust
in climate change debates, WIRES Clim. Change, 5, 151–160,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.262, 2014.
Gravina, T., Muselli, M., Ligrone, R., and Rutigliano, F. A.: SUstaiNability:
a science communication website on environmental research, Nat. Hazards Earth
Syst. Sci., 17, 1437–1446, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1437-2017, 2017.
Groulx, M., Brisbois, M. C., Lemieux, C. J., Winegardner, A., and Fishback,
L.: A Role for Nature-Based Citizen Science in Promoting Individual and
Collective Climate Change Action? A Systematic Review of Learning Outcomes,
Sci. Commun., 39, 45–76, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016688324, 2017.
Harvey, M.: Drama, Talk, and Emotion: Omitted Aspects of Public
Participation, Sci. Technol. Hum. Val., 34, 139–161,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907309632, 2008.
Illingworth, S. and Allen, G.: Effective Science Communication A practical
guide to surviving as a scientist, IOP Publishing, Bristol, UK, 2016.
Jiao, Y., Bower, J. K., Im, W., Basta, N., Obrycki, J., Al-Hamdan, M. Z.,
Wilder, A., Bollinger, C. E., Zhang, T., Hatten, L. S., Hatten, J., and Hood,
D. B.: Application of citizen science risk communication tools in a
vulnerable urban community, Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. He., 13, 11,
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010011, 2015.
Johnson, C. L. and Priest, S. J.: Flood Risk Management in England: A
Changing Landscape of Risk Responsibility?, Int. J. Water Resour. D., 24,
513–525, https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620801923146, 2008.
Kaewkitipong, L., Chen, C., and Ractham, P.: Lessons learned from the use of
social media in combating a crisis: A case study of 2011 Thailand flooding
disaster, in: ICIS 2012 proceedings, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2012.
Kaewkitipong, L., Chen, C. C., and Ractham, P.: A community-based approach to
sharing knowledge before, during, and after crisis events: A case study from
Thailand, Comput. Hum. Behav., 54, 653–666, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.063,
2016.
Katz, E. and Lazarsfeld, P. F.: Personal Influence, the Part Played by People
in the Flow of Mass Communications, Transaction Publishers, New York, NY,
USA, 1966.
Kay, S., Zhao, B., and Sui, D.: Can Social Media Clear the Air? A Case Study
of the Air Pollution Problem in Chinese Cities, Prof. Geogr., 67, 351–363,
https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2014.970838, 2015.
Kongthon, A., Haruechaiyasak, C., Pailai, J., and Kongyoung, S.: The Role of
Twitter during a Natural Disaster: Case Study of 2011 Thai Flood, in:
Technology Management for Emerging Technologies (PICMET), 2012 Proceedings of
PICMET'12, Vancouver, Cannada, 2227–2232, 2012.
Kongthon, A., Haruechaiyasak, C., Pailai, J., and Kongyoung, S.: The role of
social media during a natural disaster: A case study of the 2011 thai flood,
International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 11, 1402002,
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877014400124, 2014.
Le Coz, J., Patalano, A., Collins, D., Guillén, N. F., García, C.
M., Smart, G. M., Bind, J., Chiaverini, A., Le Boursicaud, R., Dramais, G.,
and Braud, I.: Crowdsourced data for flood hydrology: Feedback from recent
citizen science projects in Argentina, France and New Zealand, J. Hydrol.,
541, 766–777, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.036, 2016.
Leon, J. X., Hardcastle, J., James, R., Albert, S., Kereseka, J., and
Woodroffe, C. D.: Supporting Local and Traditional Knowledge with Science for
Adaptation to Climate Change: Lessons Learned from Participatory
Three-Dimensional Modeling in BoeBoe, Solomon Islands, Coast. Manage., 43,
424–438, https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2015.1046808, 2015.
Leong, C., Pan, S. L., Ractham, P., and Kaewkitipong, L.: ICT-enabled
community empowerment in crisis response: Social media in Thailand flooding
2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 16, 174–212, 2015.
Lo, A. Y., Alexander, K. S., Proctor, W., and Ryan, A.: Reciprocity as
deliberative capacity: Lessons from a citizen's deliberation on carbon
pricing mechanisms in Australia, Environ. Plann. C, 31, 444–459,
https://doi.org/10.1068/c11192, 2013.
Longnecker, N.: An integrated model of science communication – More than
providing evidence, JCOM – J. Sci. Commun., available at:
https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/15/05/JCOM_1505_2016_Y01, last access: 10
November 2016.
Lumbroso, D. M., Suckall, N. R., Nicholls, R. J., and White, K. D.: Enhancing
resilience to coastal flooding from severe storms in the USA: international
lessons, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1357–1373,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1357-2017, 2017.
Mackay, E. B., Wilkinson, M. E., Macleod, C. J. A., Beven, K., Percy, B. J.,
Macklin, M. G., Quinn, P. F., Stutter, M., and Haygarth, P. M.: Digital
catchment observatories: A platform for engagement and knowledge exchange
between catchment scientists, policy makers, and local communities: DIGITAL
CATCHMENT OBSERVATORY: AIDING STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT, Water Resour. Res., 51,
4815–4822, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016824, 2015.
Mani, L., Cole, P. D., and Stewart, I.: Using video games for volcanic hazard
education and communication: an assessment of the method and preliminary
results, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1673–1689,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1673-2016, 2016.
Mao, M. and Pan, S. L.: Constructing the Cultural Repertoire in a Natural
Disaster: The Role of Social Media in the Thailand Flood of 2011, Proceedings
of the 25th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 8th–10th
December, Auckland, New Zealand, 2014.
McCallum, I., Liu, W., See, L., Mechler, R., Keating, A., Hochrainer-Stigler,
S., Mochizuki, J., Fritz, S., Dugar, S., Arestegui, M., Szoenyi, M., Bayas,
J.-C. L., Burek, P., French, A., and Moorthy, I.: Technologies to Support
Community Flood Disaster Risk Reduction, Int. J. Disast. Risk Sc., 7,
198–204, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-016-0086-5, 2016.
McCormick, S.: After the cap: Risk assessment, citizen science and disaster
recovery, Ecol. Soc., 17, 31, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05263-170431, 2012.
Miller, S.: Public understanding of science at the crossroads, Public
Underst. Sci., 10, 115–120, https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/308, 2001.
Moreno Ramírez, D., Ramírez-Andreotta, M. D., Vea, L.,
Estrella-Sánchez, R., Wolf, A. M. A., Kilungo, A., Spitz, A. H., and
Betterton, E. A.: Pollution Prevention through Peer Education: A Community
Health Worker and Small and Home-Based Business Initiative on the
Arizona-Sonora Border, Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. He., 12, 11209–11226,
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120911209, 2015.
Naik, N.: Flooded streets – A crowdsourced sensing system for disaster
response: A case study, in 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Systems
Engineering (ISSE), 1–3, IEEE, Edinburgh, UK, 2016.
Ngo, N. S., Kokoyo, S., and Klopp, J.: Why participation matters for air
quality studies: risk perceptions, understandings of air pollution and
mobilization in a poor neighborhood in Nairobi, Kenya, Public Health, 142,
177–185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.07.014, 2017.
O'Hare, P., White, I., and Connelly, A.: Insurance as maladaptation:
Resilience and the `business as usual' paradox, Environ. Plann. C, 34,
1175–1193, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15602022, 2016.
Pennington, C., Freeborough, K., Dashwood, C., Dijkstra, T., and Lawrie, K.:
The National Landslide Database of Great Britain: Acquisition, communication
and the role of social media, Geomorphology, 249, 44–51,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.013, 2015.
Petticrew, M. and Roberts, H.: Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A
Practical Guide, 1st Edn., John Wiley & Sons, Malden, Mass., 2005.
Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Avramides, K., Freitas, S. D., and Memarzia, K.:
Societal impact of a serious game on raising public awareness: The case of
FloodSim, 15–22, available at:
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-70450234965&partnerID=40&md5=d9ad929617bf0feb80c2857b3730a3e5
(last access: 3 May 2017), 2009.
Rizza, C. and Pereira, A. G.: Building a resilient community through social
network: Ethical considerations about the 2011 Genoa floods, 289–293,
available at:
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84905833904&partnerID=40&md5=9a0e156e1d3ca9cf9cba9eedcdac11de
(last access: 13 June 2017), 2014.
Rijcken, T., Stijnen, J., and Slootjes, N.: “SimDelta” – Inquiry into an
Internet-Based Interactive Model for Water Infrastructure Development in The
Netherlands, Water, 4, 295–320, https://doi.org/10.3390/w4020295, 2012.
Rodriguez Bermúdez, M., Caeiro Rodriguez, M., Llamas Nistal, M., De
Carvalho, C. V., and Nogueira, F.: ECity: Virtual city environment for
engineering problem based learning, Vol. 2015-April, 159–166, Proceedings of
the 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Tallin,
Estonia, 2015.
Roshandel Arbatani, T., Labafi, S., and Robati, M.: Effects of Social Media
on the Environmental Protection Behaviour of the Public (Case Study:
Protecting Zayandeh-Rood River Environment), Int. J. Environ. Res., 10,
237–244, 2016.
Rothkrantz, L. J. M.: Flood control of the smart city Prague, in: 2016 Smart
Cities Symposium Prague (SCSP), 1–7, 2016.
Saldana, J.: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 1st Edn., Sage
Publications Ltd, Los Angeles, 2009.
Salvati, P., Pernice, U., Bianchi, C., Marchesini, I., Fiorucci, F., and
Guzzetti, F.: Communication strategies to address geohydrological risks: the
POLARIS web initiative in Italy, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16,
1487–1497, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1487-2016,
2016.
Santos, B., Romão, T., Dias, A. E., Centieiro, P., and Teixeira, B.:
Changing Environmental Behaviors through Smartphone-Based Augmented
Experiences, in Advances in Computer Entertainment, Vol. 7624, edited by:
Nijholt, A., Romão, T., and Reidsma, D., 553–556, Springer Berlin
Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012.
Savic, D. A., Morley, M. S., and Khoury, M.: Serious gaming for water systems
planning and management, Water Switz., 8, 456, https://doi.org/10.3390/w8100456, 2016.
Senaratna, N., Baudoin, M.-A., Oluoko-Odingo, A. A., Ajuang, L., Wepukhulu,
D. W., and Mwadali, A. S.: Natural hazards and climate change in Kenya:
Minimizing the impacts on vulnerable communities through early warning
systems, in: Reducing Disaster: Early Warning Systems for Climate Change,
355–375, Springer, the Netherlands, 2013.
Sîrbu, A., Becker, M., Caminiti, S., De Baets, B., Elen, B., Francis,
L., Gravino, P., Hotho, A., Ingarra, S., Loreto, V., Molino, A., Mueller, J.,
Peters, J., Ricchiuti, F., Saracino, F., Servedio, V. D. P., Stumme, G.,
Theunis, J., Tria, F., and Van Den Bossche, J.: Participatory patterns in an
international air quality monitoring initiative, PLoS ONE, 10, e0136763,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136763, 2015.
Slovic, P.: Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the
Risk-Assessment Battlefield, Risk Anal., 19, 689–701,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00439.x, 1999.
Starkey, E., Parkin, G., Birkinshaw, S., Large, A., Quinn, P,. and Gibson,
C.: Demonstrating the value of community-based (“citizen science”)
observations for catchment modelling and characterisation, J. Hydrol., 548,
801–817, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.019, 2017.
St. Denis, L. A., Palen, L., and Anderson, K. M.: Mastering social media: An
analysis of Jefferson County's communications during the 2013 Colorado
floods, 737–746, available at:
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84905841710&partnerID=40&md5=55681700a6280d3fd6882933645e1192
(last access: 14 June 2017), 2014.
Thiel, M., Penna-Díaz, M. A., Luna-Jorquera, G., Salas, S., Sellanes,
J., and Stotz, W.: Citizen scientists and marine research: volunteer
participants, their contributions, and projection for the future, Oceanogr.
Mar. Biol., 52, 257–314, 2014.
Wan Hussin, W. N. T., Zakaria, N. H., and Ahmad, M. N.: Knowledge sharing via
online social media during flood disaster events: A review, J. Theor. Appl.
Inf. Technol., 89, 329–342, 2016.
Ward, T. J., Delaloye, N., Adams, E. R., Ware, D., Vanek, D., Knuth, R.,
Hester, C. L., Marra, N. N., and Holian, A.: Air Toxics Under the Big Sky:
examining the effectiveness of authentic scientific research on high school
students' science skills and interest, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 38, 905–921,
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1167984, 2016.
Weingart, P. and Guenther, L.: Science communication and the issue of trust,
J. Sci. Commun., 15, C01, https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15050301, 2016.
Whatmore, S. J. and Landström, C.: Flood apprentices: an exercise in
making things public, Econ. Soc., 40, 582–610,
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2011.602540, 2011.
Whitmarsh, L.: Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than
other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and
behavioural response, J. Risk Res., 11, 351–374,
https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870701552235, 2008.
Wilsdon, J. and Willis, R.: See-through science: why public engagement needs
to move upstream, Demos, London, 2004.
Wister, M. A., Hernández-Nolasco, J. A., Pancardo, P., Acosta, F. D., and
Jara, A.: Emergency Population Warning about Floods by Social Media, in: 2016
10th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in
Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS), 322–327, 2016.
World Economic Forum: The Global Risks Report 2016, World Econ. Forum,
available at:
https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2016/, last
access: 9 November 2016.
Xu, J. H.: Communicating the right to know: Social media in the
do-it-yourself air quality testing campaign in Chinese cities, Int. J.
Commun., 8, 1374–1393, 2014.
Yadav, M. and Rahman, Z.: The social role of social media: the case of
Chennai rains-2015, Soc. Netw. Anal. Min., 6, 101,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-016-0410-5, 2016.
Zhang, M. W. B., Ho, C. S. H., Fang, P., Lu, Y., and Ho, R. C. M.: Usage of
social media and smartphone application in assessment of physical and
psychological well-being of individuals in times of a major air pollution
crisis, J. Med. Internet Res., 2, e16, https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.2827, 2014.
Short summary
Urban centres worldwide are adversely affected by flooding and air pollution. Effective communication between experts and citizens is key to understanding and limiting the impact of these hazards, as citizens have valuable knowledge based on their day-to-day experiences. In this study, we compare five different communication formats that can facilitate the required dialogue and explore the best ways and optimal circumstances in which these can be implemented.
Urban centres worldwide are adversely affected by flooding and air pollution. Effective...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint