Geoscience Communication
Geoscience Communication
GC
Articles | Volume 2, issue 1
Articles | Volume 2, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-39-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-39-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 2, issue 1
Research article
 | 
24 Jan 2019
Research article |  | 24 Jan 2019

Building bridges between experts and the public: a comparison of two-way communication formats for flooding and air pollution risk

Maria Loroño-Leturiondo, Paul O'Hare, Simon J. Cook, Stephen R. Hoon, and Sam Illingworth

Viewed

Total article views: 4,357 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,040 1,160 157 4,357 144 150
  • HTML: 3,040
  • PDF: 1,160
  • XML: 157
  • Total: 4,357
  • BibTeX: 144
  • EndNote: 150
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 May 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 May 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,357 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,838 with geography defined and 519 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Apr 2025
Download
Short summary
Urban centres worldwide are adversely affected by flooding and air pollution. Effective communication between experts and citizens is key to understanding and limiting the impact of these hazards, as citizens have valuable knowledge based on their day-to-day experiences. In this study, we compare five different communication formats that can facilitate the required dialogue and explore the best ways and optimal circumstances in which these can be implemented.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint