Articles | Volume 4, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Editorial
| 
27 Oct 2021
Editorial |
| 27 Oct 2021
| 27 Oct 2021
Editorial: Geoscience communication – planning to make it publishable
Geography and Environment, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK
GC executive editor
Katharine E. Welsh
Department of Geography and International Development, University of Chester, Chester, CH1 4BJ, UK
GC editor
Mathew Stiller-Reeve
Konsulent Stiller-Reeve, Valestrandsfossen, Norway
Center for Climate and Energy Transformation, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
GC editor
Rebecca K. Priestley
Centre for Science in Society, Te Herenga Waka – Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
GC editor
Heidi A. Roop
Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota, USA
GC editor
Tiziana Lanza
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy
GC editor
Sam Illingworth
Department of Learning and Teaching Enhancement, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, EH11 4BN, UK
GC chief-executive editor
Related authors
Shahzad Gani, Louise Arnal, Lucy Beattie, John Hillier, Sam Illingworth, Tiziana Lanza, Solmaz Mohadjer, Karoliina Pulkkinen, Heidi Roop, Iain Stewart, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, and Stephanie Zihms
Geosci. Commun., 7, 251–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Science communication in geosciences has societal and scientific value but often operates in “shadowlands”. This editorial highlights these issues and proposes potential solutions. Our objective is to create a transparent and responsible geoscience communication landscape, fostering scientific progress, the well-being of scientists, and societal benefits.
John Hillier, Adrian Champion, Tom Perkins, Freya Garry, and Hannah Bloomfield
Geosci. Commun., 7, 195–200, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-195-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-195-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To allow for more effective use of climate science, this work proposes and evaluates an open-access R code that deploys a measure of how natural hazards (e.g. extreme wind and flooding) co-occur, is obtainable from scientific research and is usable in practice without restricted data (climate or risk) being exposed. The approach can be applied to hazards in various sectors (e.g. road, rail and telecommunications).
John K. Hillier and Michiel van Meeteren
Geosci. Commun., 7, 35–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-35-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-35-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Co-RISK is a workshop-based
toolkitto aid the co-creation of joint projects in various sectors (e.g. insurance, rail, power generation) impacted by natural hazard risks. There is a genuine need to quickly convert the latest insights from environmental research into real-world climate change adaptation strategies, and a gap exists for an accessible (i.e. open access, low tech, zero cost) and practical solution tailored to assist with this.
John K. Hillier, Chris Unsworth, Luke De Clerk, and Sergey Savel'ev
Geosci. Commun., 5, 11–15, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-11-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-11-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
It is an aspiration to infer flow conditions from bedform morphology (e.g. riverbed ripples) where sedimentary structures preserve the geological past or in inaccessible environments (e.g. Mars). This study was motivated by the idea of better designing an AI (artificial intelligence) algorithm to do this by using lessons from non-AI (i.e. human) abilities, investigated using a geoscience communication activity. A survey and an artificial neural network are used in a successful proof of concept.
John K. Hillier, Geoffrey R. Saville, Mike J. Smith, Alister J. Scott, Emma K. Raven, Jonathon Gascoigne, Louise J. Slater, Nevil Quinn, Andreas Tsanakas, Claire Souch, Gregor C. Leckebusch, Neil Macdonald, Alice M. Milner, Jennifer Loxton, Rebecca Wilebore, Alexandra Collins, Colin MacKechnie, Jaqui Tweddle, Sarah Moller, MacKenzie Dove, Harry Langford, and Jim Craig
Geosci. Commun., 2, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-1-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-1-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Worldwide there is intense interest in converting research excellence in universities into commercial success, but there has been scant attention devoted to exactly how individual scientists' workload and incentive structures may be a key barrier to this. Our work reveals the real challenge posed by a time-constrained university culture, better describes how work with business might fit into an academic job, and gives tips on working together in an
user guidefor scientists and (re)insurers.
Giulia Sofia, John K. Hillier, and Susan J. Conway
Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 721–725, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-721-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-721-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The interdisciplinarity of geomorphometry is its greatest strength and one of its major challenges. This special issue showcases exciting developments that are the building blocks for the next step-change in the field. In reading and compiling the contributions we hope that the scientific community will be inspired to seek out collaborations and share ideas across subject-boundaries, between technique-developers and users, enabling us as a community to gather knowledge from our digital landscape
J. K. Hillier, G. Sofia, and S. J. Conway
Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 587–598, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-587-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-587-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
How good are measurements of shapes in the landscape? This is not well constrained. We suggest that "synthetic tests" using constructed digital landscapes called synthetic DEMs are a powerful and necessary tool to establish the reliability of these data (e.g. mapped sizes). Thus, the tests have a key, complementary role in determining if conceptual and physics-driven models of processes can be reconciled with morphological observations of reality. A typology of synthetic DEMs is proposed.
Shahzad Gani, Louise Arnal, Lucy Beattie, John Hillier, Sam Illingworth, Tiziana Lanza, Solmaz Mohadjer, Karoliina Pulkkinen, Heidi Roop, Iain Stewart, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, and Stephanie Zihms
Geosci. Commun., 7, 251–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Science communication in geosciences has societal and scientific value but often operates in “shadowlands”. This editorial highlights these issues and proposes potential solutions. Our objective is to create a transparent and responsible geoscience communication landscape, fostering scientific progress, the well-being of scientists, and societal benefits.
John Hillier, Adrian Champion, Tom Perkins, Freya Garry, and Hannah Bloomfield
Geosci. Commun., 7, 195–200, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-195-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-195-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To allow for more effective use of climate science, this work proposes and evaluates an open-access R code that deploys a measure of how natural hazards (e.g. extreme wind and flooding) co-occur, is obtainable from scientific research and is usable in practice without restricted data (climate or risk) being exposed. The approach can be applied to hazards in various sectors (e.g. road, rail and telecommunications).
Minja Sillanpää, AnaCapri Mauro, Minttu Hänninen, Sam Illingworth, and Mo Hamza
Geosci. Commun., 7, 167–193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-167-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-167-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Minions of Disruptions is a climate change game designed as a communication tool for groups that do not regularly engage with the topic. In our research, we find that the game is liked by the general public because it encourages collective action. This is important because most local climate challenges can only be solved by groups and because gameplay can increase collaboration. The results of this study may be used to develop communication tools that better consider the needs of the audiences.
John K. Hillier and Michiel van Meeteren
Geosci. Commun., 7, 35–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-35-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-35-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Co-RISK is a workshop-based
toolkitto aid the co-creation of joint projects in various sectors (e.g. insurance, rail, power generation) impacted by natural hazard risks. There is a genuine need to quickly convert the latest insights from environmental research into real-world climate change adaptation strategies, and a gap exists for an accessible (i.e. open access, low tech, zero cost) and practical solution tailored to assist with this.
Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 6, 131–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-131-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-131-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this article, I explore the various ways the geosciences can be communicated to a wider audience. I focus on creative methods that range from sharing information to involving the public in the research process. By using examples from my own work and the wider literature, I demonstrate how these approaches can engage diverse communities and promote greater recognition for geoscience communication.
Suzanna Clark, J. Felix Wolfinger, Melissa A. Kenney, Michael D. Gerst, and Heidi A. Roop
Geosci. Commun., 6, 27–38, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-27-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-27-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed 50 documents containing input from farmers, rangeland managers, and water resource managers to understand climate information needs in the U.S. Corn Belt. Practitioners want information to help them make agricultural, water, and risk management decisions to improve economic outcomes. These results can inform decision support tool development, summarize background information for future research in the Corn Belt, and provide an example for research in other sectors and geographies.
Michael N. Dyonisius, Vasilii V. Petrenko, Andrew M. Smith, Benjamin Hmiel, Peter D. Neff, Bin Yang, Quan Hua, Jochen Schmitt, Sarah A. Shackleton, Christo Buizert, Philip F. Place, James A. Menking, Ross Beaudette, Christina Harth, Michael Kalk, Heidi A. Roop, Bernhard Bereiter, Casey Armanetti, Isaac Vimont, Sylvia Englund Michel, Edward J. Brook, Jeffrey P. Severinghaus, Ray F. Weiss, and Joseph R. McConnell
The Cryosphere, 17, 843–863, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-843-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-843-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Cosmic rays that enter the atmosphere produce secondary particles which react with surface minerals to produce radioactive nuclides. These nuclides are often used to constrain Earth's surface processes. However, the production rates from muons are not well constrained. We measured 14C in ice with a well-known exposure history to constrain the production rates from muons. 14C production in ice is analogous to quartz, but we obtain different production rates compared to commonly used estimates.
Mathew Stiller-Reeve, Claudio Argentino, Kate Alyse Waghorn, Sunil Vadakkepuliyambatta, Dimitri Kalenitchenko, and Giuliana Panieri
Geosci. Commun., 6, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-1-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-1-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we describe a process in which geoscientists corresponded with school classes in three different countries using handwritten letters and Polaroid photo albums. The stories they told were based on their experiences during a research expedition in the Arctic. We evaluated the process and show some of the benefits the students experienced from their correspondence with the scientists in this way.
Caitlyn A. Hall, Sam Illingworth, Solmaz Mohadjer, Mathew Koll Roxy, Craig Poku, Frederick Otu-Larbi, Darryl Reano, Mara Freilich, Maria-Luisa Veisaga, Miguel Valencia, and Joey Morales
Geosci. Commun., 5, 275–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-275-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-275-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this manifesto, we offer six points of reflection that higher education geoscience educators can act upon to recognise and unlearn their biases and diversify the geosciences in higher education, complementing current calls for institutional and organisational change. This serves as a starting point to gather momentum to establish community-built opportunities for implementing and strengthening diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice holistically in geoscience education.
Alice Wardle and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 5, 221–225, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-221-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-221-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Participants answered four questions concerning their experience writing a haiku based on a geoscience extract. Data were categorised as being part of the
Task Processor
Task Meaning. The themes involved in the
Task Processwere
Identification of significant information,
Distillation of informationand
Metamorphosis of text, while the themes related to
Task Meaningwere made up of
Enjoyable,
Challenging(which has sub-themes
Frustratingand
Restricted) and
Valuable.
John K. Hillier, Chris Unsworth, Luke De Clerk, and Sergey Savel'ev
Geosci. Commun., 5, 11–15, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-11-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-11-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
It is an aspiration to infer flow conditions from bedform morphology (e.g. riverbed ripples) where sedimentary structures preserve the geological past or in inaccessible environments (e.g. Mars). This study was motivated by the idea of better designing an AI (artificial intelligence) algorithm to do this by using lessons from non-AI (i.e. human) abilities, investigated using a geoscience communication activity. A survey and an artificial neural network are used in a successful proof of concept.
Hazel Gibson, Sam Illingworth, and Susanne Buiter
Geosci. Commun., 4, 437–451, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-437-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-437-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In the spring of 2020, in response to the escalating global COVID-19 Coronavirus pandemic, the European Geosciences Union (EGU) moved its annual General Assembly online in a matter of weeks. This paper explores the feedback provided by participants who attended this experimental conference and identifies four key themes that emerged from analysis of the survey (connection, engagement, environment, and accessibility). The responses raise important questions about the format of future conferences.
Tiziana Lanza
Geosci. Commun., 4, 111–127, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-111-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-111-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The paper brings a classical debate within the literary scholars' community to a scientific context – the sources that William Shakespeare used for The Tempest. The play is studied in the context of natural hazards, suggesting that geosciences can help to move the debate forward by adding new elements. The paper then collects all the clues that can help to place the island from The Tempest in a Mediterranean context, suggesting that the playwright was a witness to volcanism in the Sicilian sea.
Antonio Menghini, Stefano Pontani, Vincenzo Sapia, and Tiziana Lanza
Geosci. Commun., 3, 329–341, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-329-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-329-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The EMusic project aims to use music as a tool to explain, to a wide audience, the role of geophysics and geology in our society. By means of the sonification of the electromagnetic (EM) response of the Earth, we are able to accompany people on an imaginary voyage into the subsurface so that they can travel into the depths and into the past. In this way, the audience can learn about the geological evolution of the site, which is used as a natural stage, from where the EM data were collected.
Tiziana Lanza
Geosci. Commun., 3, 127–128, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-127-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-127-2020, 2020
Arianna Soldati and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 3, 73–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-73-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-73-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we investigate what poetry written about volcanoes from the 1800s to the present day reveals about the relationship between humanity and volcanoes, including how it evolved over that time frame. This analysis reveals that the human–volcano relationship is especially centred around the sense of identity that volcanoes provide to humans, which may follow from both positive and negative events, and has a spiritual element to it.
Jonathan P. Tennant, Sam Illingworth, Iain Stewart, and Kirsten von Elverfeldt
Geosci. Commun., 3, 71–72, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-71-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-71-2020, 2020
Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 3, 35–47, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-35-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-35-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
To many non-specialists, the science behind climate change can appear confusing and alienating, yet in order for global mitigation efforts to be successful it is not just scientists who need to take action, but rather society as a whole. This study shows how poets and poetry offer a method of communicating the science of climate change to the wider society
using language that they not only better understand, but which also has the potential to stimulate accountability and inspire action.
Rolf Hut, Casper Albers, Sam Illingworth, and Chris Skinner
Geosci. Commun., 2, 117–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-117-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-117-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Game worlds in modern computer games, while they include very Earth-like landscapes, are ultimately fake. Since games can be used for learning, we wondered if people pick up wrong information from games. Using a survey we tested if people with a background in geoscience are better than people without such a background at distinguishing if game landscapes are realistic. We found that geoscientists are significantly better at this, but the difference is small and overall everyone is good at it.
Maria Loroño-Leturiondo, Paul O'Hare, Simon J. Cook, Stephen R. Hoon, and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 2, 39–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-39-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-39-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Urban centres worldwide are adversely affected by flooding and air pollution. Effective communication between experts and citizens is key to understanding and limiting the impact of these hazards, as citizens have valuable knowledge based on their day-to-day experiences. In this study, we compare five different communication formats that can facilitate the required dialogue and explore the best ways and optimal circumstances in which these can be implemented.
John K. Hillier, Geoffrey R. Saville, Mike J. Smith, Alister J. Scott, Emma K. Raven, Jonathon Gascoigne, Louise J. Slater, Nevil Quinn, Andreas Tsanakas, Claire Souch, Gregor C. Leckebusch, Neil Macdonald, Alice M. Milner, Jennifer Loxton, Rebecca Wilebore, Alexandra Collins, Colin MacKechnie, Jaqui Tweddle, Sarah Moller, MacKenzie Dove, Harry Langford, and Jim Craig
Geosci. Commun., 2, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-1-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-1-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Worldwide there is intense interest in converting research excellence in universities into commercial success, but there has been scant attention devoted to exactly how individual scientists' workload and incentive structures may be a key barrier to this. Our work reveals the real challenge posed by a time-constrained university culture, better describes how work with business might fit into an academic job, and gives tips on working together in an
user guidefor scientists and (re)insurers.
Richard H. Levy, Gavin B. Dunbar, Marcus J. Vandergoes, Jamie D. Howarth, Tony Kingan, Alex R. Pyne, Grant Brotherston, Michael Clarke, Bob Dagg, Matthew Hill, Evan Kenton, Steve Little, Darcy Mandeno, Chris Moy, Philip Muldoon, Patrick Doyle, Conrad Raines, Peter Rutland, Delia Strong, Marianna Terezow, Leise Cochrane, Remo Cossu, Sean Fitzsimons, Fabio Florindo, Alexander L. Forrest, Andrew R. Gorman, Darrell S. Kaufman, Min Kyung Lee, Xun Li, Pontus Lurcock, Nicholas McKay, Faye Nelson, Jennifer Purdie, Heidi A. Roop, S. Geoffrey Schladow, Abha Sood, Phaedra Upton, Sharon L. Walker, and Gary S. Wilson
Sci. Dril., 24, 41–50, https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-24-41-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-24-41-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
A new annually resolvable sedimentary record of southern hemisphere climate has been recovered from Lake Ohau, South Island, New Zealand. The Lake Ohau Climate History (LOCH) Project acquired cores from two sites that preserve an 80 m thick sequence of laminated mud that accumulated since the lake formed ~ 17 000 years ago. Cores were recovered using a purpose-built barge and drilling system designed to recover soft sediment from relatively thick sedimentary sequences at water depths up to 100 m.
Sam Illingworth, Alice Bell, Stuart Capstick, Adam Corner, Piers Forster, Rosie Leigh, Maria Loroño Leturiondo, Catherine Muller, Harriett Richardson, and Emily Shuckburgh
Geosci. Commun., 1, 9–24, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-9-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-9-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change is real, it is happening now, and it will not be stopped by the sole efforts of scientists. This study shows how poetry and open conversation can be used to develop a dialogue around mitigating climate change with different communities, including faith groups and people living with disabilities. Furthermore, it shows how this dialogue can help us to better understand the opportunities that these communities present in tackling the negative effects of human-made climate change.
Sam Illingworth, Iain Stewart, Jonathan Tennant, and Kirsten von Elverfeldt
Geosci. Commun., 1, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-1-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-1-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Welcome to the journal of Geoscience Communication! We decided to write this editorial in order to introduce ourselves (the executive editors of GC), to provide a history of its development, and to serve as a guideline for future authors who wish to submit to this journal. We hope that this article serves as a useful aid for people who are considering publishing in GC, as well as the wider geoscience community, and that it can act in the first instance as a FAQ for authors, editors, and readers alike.
Maria Loroño-Leturiondo, Paul O'Hare, Simon Cook, Stephen R. Hoon, and Sam Illingworth
Adv. Sci. Res., 15, 45–50, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-45-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-45-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Globally we are facing both an air quality crisis and a communication emergency. Communication efforts so far have been based on a one-way provision of information from experts to society, and have arguably failed in their mission to foster a more engaged society, or to result in cleaner air. This paper supports the case for moving away from one-way communication, and identifies five benefits of a practical two-way communication between experts and citizens in order to engender positive change.
Giulia Sofia, John K. Hillier, and Susan J. Conway
Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 721–725, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-721-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-721-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The interdisciplinarity of geomorphometry is its greatest strength and one of its major challenges. This special issue showcases exciting developments that are the building blocks for the next step-change in the field. In reading and compiling the contributions we hope that the scientific community will be inspired to seek out collaborations and share ideas across subject-boundaries, between technique-developers and users, enabling us as a community to gather knowledge from our digital landscape
Mathew A. Stiller-Reeve, Céline Heuzé, William T. Ball, Rachel H. White, Gabriele Messori, Karin van der Wiel, Iselin Medhaug, Annemarie H. Eckes, Amee O'Callaghan, Mike J. Newland, Sian R. Williams, Matthew Kasoar, Hella Elisa Wittmeier, and Valerie Kumer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2965–2973, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2965-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2965-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Scientific writing must improve and the key to long-term improvement of scientific writing lies with the early-career scientist (ECS). We introduce the ClimateSnack project, which aims to motivate ECSs to start writing groups around the world to improve their skills together. Writing groups offer many benefits but can be a challenge to keep going. Several ClimateSnack writing groups formed, and this paper examines why some of the groups flourished and others dissolved.
J. K. Hillier, G. Sofia, and S. J. Conway
Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 587–598, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-587-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-587-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
How good are measurements of shapes in the landscape? This is not well constrained. We suggest that "synthetic tests" using constructed digital landscapes called synthetic DEMs are a powerful and necessary tool to establish the reliability of these data (e.g. mapped sizes). Thus, the tests have a key, complementary role in determining if conceptual and physics-driven models of processes can be reconciled with morphological observations of reality. A typology of synthetic DEMs is proposed.
G. Allen, S. M. Illingworth, S. J. O'Shea, S. Newman, A. Vance, S. J.-B. Bauguitte, F. Marenco, J. Kent, K. Bower, M. W. Gallagher, J. Muller, C. J. Percival, C. Harlow, J. Lee, and J. P. Taylor
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4401–4416, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4401-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4401-2014, 2014
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a validated method and data set for new retrievals of trace gas concentrations and temperature from the ARIES infrared spectrometer instrument on the UK Atmospheric Research Aircraft (www.faam.ac.uk). This new capability for the aircraft will allow new science to be done because of the way it can sense information about the atmosphere without having to physically pass through it (remote sensing). This will allow us to better understand the make-up of the lower atmosphere.
S. J. O'Shea, G. Allen, M. W. Gallagher, K. Bower, S. M. Illingworth, J. B. A. Muller, B. T. Jones, C. J. Percival, S. J-B. Bauguitte, M. Cain, N. Warwick, A. Quiquet, U. Skiba, J. Drewer, K. Dinsmore, E. G. Nisbet, D. Lowry, R. E. Fisher, J. L. France, M. Aurela, A. Lohila, G. Hayman, C. George, D. B. Clark, A. J. Manning, A. D. Friend, and J. Pyle
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13159–13174, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13159-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13159-2014, 2014
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents airborne measurements of greenhouse gases collected in the European Arctic. Regional scale flux estimates for the northern Scandinavian wetlands are derived. These fluxes are found to be in excellent agreement with coincident surface measurements within the aircraft's sampling domain. This has allowed a significant low bias to be identified in two commonly used process-based land surface models.
S. M. Illingworth, G. Allen, S. Newman, A. Vance, F. Marenco, R. C. Harlow, J. Taylor, D. P. Moore, and J. J. Remedios
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1133–1150, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1133-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1133-2014, 2014
S. J. O'Shea, G. Allen, M. W. Gallagher, S. J.-B. Bauguitte, S. M. Illingworth, M. Le Breton, J. B. A. Muller, C. J. Percival, A. T. Archibald, D. E. Oram, M. Parrington, P. I. Palmer, and A. C. Lewis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12451–12467, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12451-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12451-2013, 2013
Cited articles
Archer, M. O.: Schools of all backgrounds can do physics research – on the accessibility and equity of the Physics Research in School Environments (PRiSE) approach to independent research projects, Geosci. Commun., 4, 189–208, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-189-2021, 2021.
Archer, M. O. and DeWitt, J.: “Thanks for helping me find my enthusiasm for physics”: the lasting impacts “research in schools” projects can have on students, teachers, and schools, Geosci. Commun., 4, 169–188, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-169-2021, 2021.
Archer, M. O., Day, N., and Barnes, S.: Demonstrating change from a drop-in space soundscape exhibit by using graffiti walls both before and after, Geosci. Commun., 4, 57–67, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-57-2021, 2021a.
Archer, M. O., DeWitt, J., Thorley, C., and Keenan, O.: Evaluating participants' experience of extended interaction with cutting-edge physics research through the PRiSE “research in schools” programme, Geosci. Commun., 4, 147–168, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-147-2021, 2021b.
Balmer, D.: The value of short Earth science continuing professional development for trainee primary school teachers, Geosci. Commun., 4, 33–41, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-33-2021, 2021.
Beggan, C. D. and Marple, S. R.: Building a Raspberry Pi school magnetometer network in the UK, Geosci. Commun., 1, 25–34, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-25-2018, 2018.
BERA: Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research, 4th edn., British
Educational Research Association, available at: https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018 (last access: 26 October 2021), 2018.
Bredbenner, K. and Simon, S. M.: Video abstracts and plain language
summaries are more effective than graphical abstracts and published
abstracts, PLoS ONE, 14, e0224697, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224697, 2019.
Bucchi, M. and Trench, B.: Handbook of public communication of science and
technology, Routledge, Abingdon, UK, 2008.
Budimir, M., Donovan, A., Brown, S., Shakya, P., Gautam, D., Uprety, M., Cranston, M., Sneddon, A., Smith, P., and Dugar, S.: Communicating complex forecasts: an analysis of the approach in Nepal's flood early warning system, Geosci. Commun., 3, 49–70, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-49-2020, 2020.
Casado, M., Gremion, G., Rosenbaum, P., Caccavo, J. A., Aho, K., Champollion, N., Connors, S. L., Dahood, A., Fernandez, A., Lizotte, M., Mintenbeck, K., Poloczanska, E., and Fugmann, G.: The benefits to climate science of including early-career scientists as reviewers, Geosci. Commun., 3, 89–97, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-89-2020, 2020.
Cheng, D., Claessens, M., Gascoigne, T., Metcalfe, J., Schiele, B., and Shi, S.: Communicating Science in Social Contexts, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2008.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K.: Research Methods in Education,
Routledge, Abingdon, UK, 784 pp., 2013.
Cooke, S. J., Gallagher, A. J., Sopinka, N. M., Nguyen, V. M., Skubel, R.
A., Hammerschlag, N., Boon, S., Young, N., and Danylchuk, A. J.:
Considerations for effective science communication, FACETS, 2, 233–248,
https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2016-0055, 2017.
Côté, I. M. and Darling, E. S.: Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to
the choir or singing from the rooftops?, FACETS, 3, 682–694, https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2018-0002, 2018.
Cumiskey, L., Lickiss, M., Šakić Trogrlić, R., and Ali, J.: Interdisciplinary pressure cooker: environmental risk communication skills for the next generation, Geosci. Commun., 2, 173–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-173-2019, 2019.
Curious Minds: $2 million for STEM projects that unlock our nations'
minds, New Zealand Government, Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, available at: https://www.mbie.govt.nz/science-and-technology/science-and-innovation/funding-information-and-opportunities/investment-funds/curious-minds/ (last access: 25 October 2021), 2019.
Curious Minds: Unlocking Curious Minds Contestable Fund – Call for
Proposals, New Zealand Government, Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, available at: https://www.mbie.govt.nz/assets/be23962cf5/unlocking-curious-minds-contestable-fund-2020-investment-round-call-for-proposals.pdf (last access: 25 October 2021), 2020.
Davis, P.: Storytelling as a democratic approach to data collection:
Interviewing children about reading, Educ. Res., 49, 169–184, 2007.
Devès, M. H., Le Texier, M., Pécout, H., and Grasland, C.: Seismic risk: the biases of earthquake media coverage, Geosci. Commun., 2, 125–141, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-125-2019, 2019.
EC: HORIZON 2020 – WORK PROGRAMME 2018–2020: General Annexes; H – Evaluation rules, European Commisson (EC), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/wp/2018-2020/annexes/h2020-wp1820-annex-h-esacrit_en.pdf (last access: 26 October 2021), 2018.
Eynon, R., Fry, J., and Schroeder, R.: The ethics of internet research, in: The SAGE handbook of online research methods, Sage, 23–41, 2008.
Flewitt, R.: Conducting research with young children: Some ethical
considerations, Early Child Development and Care, 176, 553–565, 2005.
Gibbs, G.: Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods,
Oxford Polytechnic Further Education Unit, Oxford, 1988.
Guillemin, M. and Gillam, L.: Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research, Qual. Inq., 10, 261–280, 2004.
Hauck, S. A.: Sharing planetary science in plain language, J. Geophys. Res.-Planet., 124, 2462–2464, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JE006152, 2019.
Healey, R. L., Bass, T., Caulfield, J., Hoffman, A., McGinn, M. K.,
Miller-Young, J., and Haigh, M.: Being ethically minded: Practising the
scholarship of teaching and learning in an ethical manner, Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1, 23–32, 2013.
Hillier, J. K., Kler, G., and Tweddle, J.: Demystifying academics to enhance university-business collaboration, Loughborough University's repository, Figshare, https://doi.org/10.17028/rd.lboro.8283350.v2, 2019a.
Hillier, J. K., Saville, G. R., Smith, M. J., Scott, A. J., Raven, E. K., Gascoigne, J., Slater, L. J., Quinn, N., Tsanakas, A., Souch, C., Leckebusch, G. C., Macdonald, N., Milner, A. M., Loxton, J., Wilebore, R., Collins, A., MacKechnie, C., Tweddle, J., Moller, S., Dove, M., Langford, H., and Craig, J.: Demystifying academics to enhance university–business collaborations in environmental science, Geosci. Commun., 2, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-1-2019, 2019b.
Hillier, J. K., Foote, M., Tsanakas, A., Wardman, J., Mitchell-Wallace, K.,
Hughes, R., Dixon, R., Simeononva, B., and Brown, C.: Investing in science
for natural hazards insurance, Loughborough University's repository, Figshare, https://doi.org/10.17028/rd.lboro.c.4322666, 2019c.
Hut, R., Albers, C., Illingworth, S., and Skinner, C.: Taking a Breath of the Wild: are geoscientists more effective than non-geoscientists in determining whether video game world landscapes are realistic?, Geosci. Commun., 2, 117–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-117-2019, 2019.
Illingworth, S.: Delivering effective science communication: advice from a
professional science communicator, Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., 70, 10–16,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.04.002, 2017.
Illingworth, S.: Creative communication – using poetry and games to
generate dialogue between scientists and nonscientists, FEBS Lett, 594, 2333–2338, https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13891, 2020a.
Illingworth, S.: “This bookmark gauges the depths of the human”: how poetry can help to personalise climate change, Geosci. Commun., 3, 35–47, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-35-2020, 2020b.
Illingworth, S. and Allen, G.: Effective science communication, 2nd edn.,
Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, 2020.
Illingworth, S., Stewart, I., Tennant, J., and von Elverfeldt, K.: Editorial: Geoscience Communication – Building bridges, not walls, Geosci. Commun., 1, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-1-2018, 2018.
Knudsen, E. M. and de Bolsée, O. J.: Communicating climate change in a “post-factual” society: lessons learned from the Pole to Paris campaign, Geosci. Commun., 2, 83–93, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-83-2019, 2019.
Kolb, D. A.: Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, 2nd edn., Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, 2015.
Lacassin, R., Devès, M., Hicks, S. P., Ampuero, J.-P., Bossu, R., Bruhat, L., Daryono, Wibisono, D. F., Fallou, L., Fielding, E. J., Gabriel, A.-A., Gurney, J., Krippner, J., Lomax, A., Sudibyo, Muh. M., Pamumpuni, A., Patton, J. R., Robinson, H., Tingay, M., and Valkaniotis, S.: Rapid collaborative knowledge building via Twitter after significant geohazard events, Geosci. Commun., 3, 129–146, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-129-2020, 2020.
Lancaster, S. A. and Waldron, J. W. F.: Boundary|Time|Surface: assessing a meeting of art and geology through an ephemeral sculptural work, Geosci. Commun., 3, 249–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-249-2020, 2020.
Lanza, T., Crescimbene, M., La Longa, F., and D'Addezio, G.: Bringing earth into the scene of a primary school: a science theatre experience, Sci. Commun., 36, 131–139, 2014.
Locritani, M., Merlino, S., Garvani, S., and Di Laura, F.: Fun educational and artistic teaching tools for science outreach, Geosci. Commun., 3, 179–190, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-179-2020, 2020.
Loroño-Leturiondo, M., O'Hare, P., Cook, S. J., Hoon, S. R., and Illingworth, S.: Building bridges between experts and the public: a comparison of two-way communication formats for flooding and air pollution risk, Geosci. Commun., 2, 39–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-39-2019, 2019.
McGowan, E. G. and Scarlett, J. P.: Volcanoes in video games: the portrayal of volcanoes in commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) video games and their learning potential, Geosci. Commun., 4, 11–31, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-11-2021, 2020.
Narock, T., Hasnain, S., and Stephan, R.: Identifying and improving AGU collaborations using network analysis and scientometrics, Geosci. Commun., 2, 55–67, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-55-2019, 2019.
Neumann, J. L., Arnal, L., Emerton, R. E., Griffith, H., Hyslop, S., Theofanidi, S., and Cloke, H. L.: Can seasonal hydrological forecasts inform local decisions and actions? A decision-making activity, Geosci. Commun., 1, 35–57, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-35-2018, 2018.
Noone, S., Brody, A., Brown, S., Cantwell, N., Coleman, M., Sarsfield Collins, L., Darcy, C., Dee, D., Donegan, S., Fealy, R., Flattery, P., McGovern, R., Menkman, C., Murphy, M., Phillips, C., Roche, M., and Thorne, P.: Geo-locate project: a novel approach to resolving meteorological station location issues with the assistance of undergraduate students, Geosci. Commun., 2, 157–171, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-157-2019, 2019.
NSF: Perspectives on Broader Impacts, National Science Foundation, USA, available at: https://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/publications/Broader_Impacts.pdf (last access: 26 October 2021), 2014.
Özsoy, S.: Is the Earth flat or round? Primary school children's
understandings of the planet earth: The case of Turkish children, International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4,
407–415, 2012.
Pittaway, E., Bartolomei, L., and Hugman, R.: `Stop stealing our stories':
The ethics of research with vulnerable groups, Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2, 229–251, 2010.
Priestley, R. K., Dohaney, J., Atkins, C., Salmon, R., and Robinson, K.:
Engaging new Antarctic learners and ambassadors through flexible learning,
open education and immersive video lectures, Polar Rec., 55, 274–288, 2019.
Ramirez-Gonzalez, I. A., Añel, J. A., and Cid Samamed, A.: Ozone measurement practice in the laboratory using Schönbein's method, Geosci. Commun., 3, 99–108, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-99-2020, 2020.
Reano, D.: Using Indigenous Research Frameworks in the Multiple Contexts of
Research, Teaching, Mentoring, and Leading, The Qualitative Report, 25, 3902–3926, 2020.
Reed, M.: How to write a Horizon 2020 proposal that impresses on impact, in:
Fast Track Impact: Impact Guides, available at: https://www.fasttrackimpact.com/post/2017/10/31/how-to-write-a-horizon-2020-proposal-that-impresses-on-impact (last access: 26 October 2021), 2020.
Reed, M. S.: The research impact handbook, 2nd edn., Fast Track Impact, Edinburgh, UK, 379 pp., 2018.
Salmon, R. A. and Roop, H. A.: Bridging the gap between science
communication practice and theory: Reflecting on a decade of practitioner
experience using polar outreach case studies to develop a new framework for
public engagement design, Polar Rec., 55, 297–310, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247418000608, 2019.
Salmon, R. A., Priestley, R. K., and Govern, J.: The reflexive scientist: an approach to transforming publicengagement, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 7, 53–68, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0274-4, 2017.
Schrag, Z. M.: The case against ethics review in the social sciences, Research Ethics, 7, 120–131, 2011.
Shulman, H. C., Dixon, G. N., Bullock, O. M., and Colón Amill, D.: The
effects of Jargon on processing fluency, self-perceptions, and scientific
engagement, J. Lang. Soc. Psychol., 39, 579–597, https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20902177, 2020.
Signoretta, P., Chamberlain, M. C., and Hillier, J. K.: “A Picture Is Worth
10,000 Words”: A Module to Test the “Visualization Hypothesis” in
Quantitative Methods Teaching, Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences, 6, 90–104, https://doi.org/10.11120/elss.2014.00029, 2014.
Skinner, C.: Flash Flood!: a SeriousGeoGames activity combining science festivals, video games, and virtual reality with research data for communicating flood risk and geomorphology, Geosci. Commun., 3, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-1-2020, 2020.
Smith, M. S., Hillier, J. K., Otto, J.-C., and Geilhausen, M.: Geovisualisation, in: Treatise on Geomorphology, edited by: Schroder, J. F. and Bishop, M., Academic Press, San Diego, 3, 299–325,
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00054-3, 2013.
Stephens, E. M., Spiegelhalter, D. J., Mylne, K., and Harrison, M.: The Met Office Weather Game: investigating how different methods for presenting probabilistic weather forecasts influence decision-making, Geosci. Commun., 2, 101–116, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-101-2019,
2019.
Tiidenberg, K.: Research ethics, vulnerability, and trust on the internet,
in: Second International Handbook of Internet Research, Springer Nature, Switzerland, 569–583, 2020.
UKRI: Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund: for research and innovation, UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), Swindon, UK, available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/industrial-strategy-challenge-fund-joint-research-and-innovation (last access: 26 October 2021), 2017.
UKRI: Global Challenges Research Fund, UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), Swindon, UK, available at: https://www.ukri.org/research/global-challenges-research-fund/ (last access: 26 October 2021) 2018.
Van Loon, A. F., Lester-Moseley, I., Rohse, M., Jones, P., and Day, R.: Creative practice as a tool to build resilience to natural hazards in the Global South, Geosci. Commun., 3, 453–474, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-453-2020, 2020.
Venhuizen, G. J., Hut, R., Albers, C., Stoof, C. R., and Smeets, I.: Flooded by jargon: how the interpretation of water-related terms differs between hydrology experts and the general audience, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 393–403, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-393-2019, 2019.
Vicari, R., Tchiguirinskaia, I., and Schertzer, D.: Assessing the impact of outreach strategies in cities coping with climate risks, Geosci. Commun., 2, 25–38, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-25-2019, 2019.
Short summary
In this editorial we expand upon the brief advice in the first editorial of Geoscience Communication (Illingworth et al., 2018), illustrating what constitutes robust and publishable work for this journal and elucidating its key elements. Our aim is to help geoscience communicators plan a route to publication and to illustrate how good engagement work that is already being done might be developed into publishable research.
In this editorial we expand upon the brief advice in the first editorial of Geoscience...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint