Articles | Volume 4, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021
Editorial
 | 
27 Oct 2021
Editorial |  | 27 Oct 2021

Editorial: Geoscience communication – planning to make it publishable

John K. Hillier, Katharine E. Welsh, Mathew Stiller-Reeve, Rebecca K. Priestley, Heidi A. Roop, Tiziana Lanza, and Sam Illingworth

Viewed

Total article views: 2,458 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,750 641 67 2,458 42 44
  • HTML: 1,750
  • PDF: 641
  • XML: 67
  • Total: 2,458
  • BibTeX: 42
  • EndNote: 44
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jun 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jun 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,458 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,278 with geography defined and 180 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 24 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
In this editorial we expand upon the brief advice in the first editorial of Geoscience Communication (Illingworth et al., 2018), illustrating what constitutes robust and publishable work for this journal and elucidating its key elements. Our aim is to help geoscience communicators plan a route to publication and to illustrate how good engagement work that is already being done might be developed into publishable research.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint