Articles | Volume 4, issue 4
Geosci. Commun., 4, 493–506, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021
Geosci. Commun., 4, 493–506, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021

Editorial 27 Oct 2021

Editorial | 27 Oct 2021

Editorial: Geoscience communication – planning to make it publishable

John K. Hillier et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Review of gc-2021-13', Martin Archer, 04 Jun 2021
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', John K. Hillier, 07 Sep 2021
  • RC2: 'I wish I had read this editorial at the start of my SciArt career', Louise Arnal, 30 Jun 2021
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', John K. Hillier, 07 Sep 2021
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', John K. Hillier, 07 Sep 2021
  • CC1: 'Comment on gc-2021-13', Rhian Salmon, 28 Jul 2021
    • AC3: 'Reply to CC1', John K. Hillier, 07 Sep 2021

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (14 Sep 2021) by Steven Rogers
AR by John K. Hillier on behalf of the Authors (15 Sep 2021)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (17 Sep 2021) by Steven Rogers
ED: Publish as is (21 Sep 2021) by Iain Stewart(Executive Editor)
AR by John K. Hillier on behalf of the Authors (22 Sep 2021)  Author's response    Manuscript
Download
Short summary
In this editorial we expand upon the brief advice in the first editorial of Geoscience Communication (Illingworth et al., 2018), illustrating what constitutes robust and publishable work for this journal and elucidating its key elements. Our aim is to help geoscience communicators plan a route to publication and to illustrate how good engagement work that is already being done might be developed into publishable research.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint