Articles | Volume 4, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-421-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-421-2021
Research article
 | 
28 Sep 2021
Research article |  | 28 Sep 2021

Virtual mapping and analytical data integration: a teaching module using Precambrian crystalline basement in Colorado's Front Range (USA)

Kevin H. Mahan, Michael G. Frothingham, and Ellen Alexander

Related subject area

Subject: Geoscience education | Keyword: Pedagogy
GC Insights: The crystal structures behind mineral properties – a case study of using TotBlocks in an undergraduate optical mineralogy lab
Derek D. V. Leung and Paige E. dePolo
Geosci. Commun., 6, 125–129, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-125-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-125-2023, 2023
Short summary
Building confidence in STEM students through breaking (unseen) barriers
Philip J. Heron and Jamie A. Williams
Geosci. Commun., 5, 355–361, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-355-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-355-2022, 2022
Short summary
The potential for using video games to teach geoscience: learning about the geology and geomorphology of Hokkaido (Japan) from playing Pokémon Legends: Arceus
Edward G. McGowan and Lewis J. Alcott
Geosci. Commun., 5, 325–337, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-325-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-325-2022, 2022
Short summary
Learning outcomes, learning support, and cohort cohesion on a virtual field trip: an analysis of student and staff perceptions
Clare E. Bond, Jessica H. Pugsley, Lauren Kedar, Sarah R. Ledingham, Marianna Z. Skupinska, Tomasz K. Gluzinski, and Megan L. Boath
Geosci. Commun., 5, 307–323, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-307-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-307-2022, 2022
Short summary
GC Insights: Diversifying the geosciences in higher education: a manifesto for change
Caitlyn A. Hall, Sam Illingworth, Solmaz Mohadjer, Mathew Koll Roxy, Craig Poku, Frederick Otu-Larbi, Darryl Reano, Mara Freilich, Maria-Luisa Veisaga, Miguel Valencia, and Joey Morales
Geosci. Commun., 5, 275–280, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-275-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-275-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Abeyta, A., Fernandes, A., Mahon, R., and Swanson, T.: The true cost of field education is a barrier to diversifying geosciences, EarthArXiv prepint, https://doi.org/10.31223/X5BG70, 2021. a
Allmendinger, R., Cardozo, N., and Fisher, D.: Structural Geology Algorithms: Vectors & Tensors, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2013. a, b
Allmendinger, R. W., Siron, C. R., and Scott, C. P.: Structural data collection with mobile devices: Accuracy, redundancy, and best practices, J. Struct. Geol., 102, 98–112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2017.07.011, 2017. a
Atchison, C., Burmeister, K., Egger, A., Ryker, K., and Tikoff, B.: Designing Remote Field Experiences, available at: http://nagt.org/236842, last access: 21 September 2021. a
Bachmann, F., Hielscher, R., and Schaeben, H.: Texture Analysis with MTEX – Free and Open Source Software Toolbox, Solid State Phenomen., 160, 63–68, 2010. a, b, c
Download
Short summary
We describe a virtual education module that encompasses many of the basic requirements of an advanced field exercise, including designing data collection strategies, synthesizing field and laboratory data, and communicating the results. Modules like the one shared here can successfully address some of the key learning objectives that are common to field-based capstone experiences while also fostering a more accessible and inclusive learning environment for all students.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint