Geoscience Communication
Geoscience Communication
GC
Articles | Volume 8, issue 4
Articles | Volume 8, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-8-267-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-8-267-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 8, issue 4
Research article
 | 
10 Oct 2025
Research article |  | 10 Oct 2025

Communicating expected uncertainty in a geostatistical survey to support co-design with users of information

Christopher Chagumaira, Joseph G. Chimungu, Patson C. Nalivata, Martin R. Broadley, Alice E. Milne, and Richard Murray Lark

Viewed

Total article views: 1,160 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
898 211 51 1,160 92 51 88
  • HTML: 898
  • PDF: 211
  • XML: 51
  • Total: 1,160
  • Supplement: 92
  • BibTeX: 51
  • EndNote: 88
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jun 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jun 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,160 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,131 with geography defined and 29 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 10 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Our study is concerned with how uncertainty in spatial information about environmental variables can be communicated to stakeholders to make decisions about sampling whilst also considering the trade-off between sampling effort and reducing uncertainty. We tested four approaches that relate sampling density and uncertainty by eliciting the opinions of end-users. End-users preferred the method not directly linked to decision-making. More work is needed to develop and elucidate decision-specific approaches.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint