Geoscience Communication
Geoscience Communication
GC
Articles | Volume 2, issue 1
Articles | Volume 2, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-69-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-69-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 2, issue 1
Research article
 | 
06 Mar 2019
Research article |  | 06 Mar 2019

The takeover of science communication: how science lost its leading role in the public discourse on carbon capture and storage research in daily newspapers in Germany

Simon Schneider

Viewed

Total article views: 3,256 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,269 843 144 3,256 108 112
  • HTML: 2,269
  • PDF: 843
  • XML: 144
  • Total: 3,256
  • BibTeX: 108
  • EndNote: 112
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jun 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jun 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,256 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,024 with geography defined and 232 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Jan 2025
Download
Short summary
CCS media coverage in Germany was dominated by other stakeholders than science itself. If science will remain a proactive element of science communication, new approaches for future science PR have be deduced. Among these is a more differentiated understanding of target audiences and regional concerns. Furthermore, science communication has to gain a better understanding of sociocultural contexts to become more effective and successful.
Read more
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint