Articles | Volume 2, issue 1
Geosci. Commun., 2, 69–82, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-69-2019
Geosci. Commun., 2, 69–82, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-69-2019

Research article 06 Mar 2019

Research article | 06 Mar 2019

The takeover of science communication: how science lost its leading role in the public discourse on carbon capture and storage research in daily newspapers in Germany

Simon Schneider

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (31 Aug 2018) by Hazel Gibson
AR by Simon Schneider on behalf of the Authors (13 Sep 2018)  Author's response
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (11 Oct 2018) by Hazel Gibson
RR by Leslie Mabon (05 Nov 2018)
RR by Anonymous Referee #4 (10 Jan 2019)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (22 Jan 2019) by Hazel Gibson
AR by Simon Schneider on behalf of the Authors (25 Jan 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (20 Feb 2019) by Hazel Gibson
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (20 Feb 2019) by Sam Illingworth(Executive Editor)
AR by Simon Schneider on behalf of the Authors (22 Feb 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
Download
Short summary
CCS media coverage in Germany was dominated by other stakeholders than science itself. If science will remain a proactive element of science communication, new approaches for future science PR have be deduced. Among these is a more differentiated understanding of target audiences and regional concerns. Furthermore, science communication has to gain a better understanding of sociocultural contexts to become more effective and successful.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint