Articles | Volume 9, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-9-489-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-9-489-2026
Research article
 | 
23 Oct 2026
Research article |  | 23 Oct 2026

Perceptions and recommendations: exploring the ethics of using satellite data to understand, monitor, and publish research on international geohazards

Jessica A. Payne and Kate Donovan

Cited articles

Alexander, D. E.: The L'Aquila Earthquake of 6 April 2009 and Italian Government Policy on Disaster Response, J. Natural Resour. Policy Res., 2, 325–342, https://doi.org/10.1080/19390459.2010.511450, 2010. a
Andrabi, S.: Decolonising knowledge production in disaster management: a feminist perspective, Disast. Prevent. Manage., 31, 202–214, https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-04-2021-0154, 2022. a, b
Argyropoulos, V., Polikreti, K., Simon, S., and Charalambous, D.: Ethical issues in research and publication of illicit cultural property, J. Cult. Herit., 12, 214–219, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2010.09.007, 2011. a
Audacity Developer Team: Audacity, GitHub [data set], https://github.com/audacity (last access: 17 April 2025), 2023. a
Babinski, G.: GIS&T for equity and social justice, https://doi.org/10.22224/gistbok/2017.2.2, 2021. a
Download
Short summary
We explore the ethics of using satellite data for studying and monitoring geohazards. In the UK, there is little guidance for remote sensing scientists encountering ethical risks in geohazard research. We explore ethical risks through 13 interviews and three focus group discussions with UK-based geohazard remote sensing scientists. We make recommendations for satellite remote sensing ethics training and propose a light-touch ethical review system to identify and mitigate potential ethical risks.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint