Articles | Volume 9, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-9-145-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-9-145-2026
Research article
 | 
02 Apr 2026
Research article |  | 02 Apr 2026

Quantifying the impact of Skeptical Science rebuttals in reducing climate misperceptions

John Cook, Bärbel Winkler, Collin J. H. M. Maessen, Timo Lubitz, Doug Bostrom, and Dana Nuccitelli

Viewed

Total article views: 2,942 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,446 1,448 48 2,942 55 49
  • HTML: 1,446
  • PDF: 1,448
  • XML: 48
  • Total: 2,942
  • BibTeX: 55
  • EndNote: 49
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,942 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,876 with geography defined and 66 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 02 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
Visitors to Skeptical Science – a website debunking climate misinformation – were surveyed to measure if rebuttals changed their perceptions about climate change. Nearly half of visitors already believed in climate science, showing strong agreement with climate facts and strong disagreement with climate myths. For those who did not agree with climate facts, rebuttals successfully reduced belief in myths. The greatest improvement occurred with those who started with the most inaccurate views.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint