Articles | Volume 7, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-227-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-227-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Planning virtual and hybrid events: steps to improve inclusion and accessibility
The Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre in Applied Geosciences (iCRAG), School of Earth Sciences, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Geoscience (EDIG) project, Dublin, Ireland
Victoria Dutch
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
UK Polar Network, UK Arctic Office, Cambridge, UK
Bridget Warren
School of Earth, Environment and Ecosystem Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
Robert A. Watson
The Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre in Applied Geosciences (iCRAG), School of Earth Sciences, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Geoscience (EDIG) project, Dublin, Ireland
Kevin Murphy
Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland, Twickenham, UK
Angus Aldis
Accessibility in Polar Research, UK
Isabelle Cooper
Accessibility in Polar Research, UK
Charlotte Cockram
Accessibility in Polar Research, UK
Dyess Harp
Accessibility in Polar Research, UK
Morgane Desmau
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Geoscience (EDIG) project, Dublin, Ireland
Canadian Light Source Inc., University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
Lydia Keppler
Accessibility in Polar Research, UK
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Adrien Damseaux, Heidrun Matthes, Victoria R. Dutch, Leanne Wake, and Nick Rutter
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1412, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1412, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Models often underestimate the role of snow cover in permafrost regions, leading to soil temperatures and permafrost dynamics inaccuracies. Through the use of a snow thermal conductivity scheme better adapted to this region, we mitigated soil temperature biases and permafrost extent overestimation within a land surface model. Our study sheds light on the importance of refining snow-related processes in models to enhance our understanding of permafrost dynamics in the context of climate change.
Victoria R. Dutch, Nick Rutter, Leanne Wake, Oliver Sonnentag, Gabriel Hould Gosselin, Melody Sandells, Chris Derksen, Branden Walker, Gesa Meyer, Richard Essery, Richard Kelly, Phillip Marsh, Julia Boike, and Matteo Detto
Biogeosciences, 21, 825–841, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-825-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-825-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We undertake a sensitivity study of three different parameters on the simulation of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) during the snow-covered non-growing season at an Arctic tundra site. Simulations are compared to eddy covariance measurements, with near-zero NEE simulated despite observed CO2 release. We then consider how to parameterise the model better in Arctic tundra environments on both sub-seasonal timescales and cumulatively throughout the snow-covered non-growing season.
Victoria R. Dutch, Nick Rutter, Leanne Wake, Melody Sandells, Chris Derksen, Branden Walker, Gabriel Hould Gosselin, Oliver Sonnentag, Richard Essery, Richard Kelly, Phillip Marsh, Joshua King, and Julia Boike
The Cryosphere, 16, 4201–4222, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4201-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4201-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Measurements of the properties of the snow and soil were compared to simulations of the Community Land Model to see how well the model represents snow insulation. Simulations underestimated snow thermal conductivity and wintertime soil temperatures. We test two approaches to reduce the transfer of heat through the snowpack and bring simulated soil temperatures closer to measurements, with an alternative parameterisation of snow thermal conductivity being more appropriate.
Djamil Al-Halbouni, Robert A. Watson, Eoghan P. Holohan, Rena Meyer, Ulrich Polom, Fernando M. Dos Santos, Xavier Comas, Hussam Alrshdan, Charlotte M. Krawczyk, and Torsten Dahm
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3351–3395, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3351-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3351-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The rapid decline of the Dead Sea level since the 1960s has provoked a dynamic reaction from the coastal groundwater system, with physical and chemical erosion creating subsurface voids and conduits. By combining remote sensing, geophysical methods, and numerical modelling at the Dead Sea’s eastern shore, we link groundwater flow patterns to the formation of surface stream channels, sinkholes and uvalas. Better understanding of this karst system will improve regional hazard assessment.
Robert A. Watson, Eoghan P. Holohan, Djamil Al-Halbouni, Leila Saberi, Ali Sawarieh, Damien Closson, Hussam Alrshdan, Najib Abou Karaki, Christian Siebert, Thomas R. Walter, and Torsten Dahm
Solid Earth, 10, 1451–1468, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1451-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1451-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The fall of the Dead Sea level since the 1960s has provoked the formation of over 6000 sinkholes, a major hazard to local economy and infrastructure. In this context, we study the evolution of subsidence phenomena at three area scales at the Dead Sea’s eastern shore from 1967–2017. Our results yield the most detailed insights to date into the spatio-temporal development of sinkholes and larger depressions (uvalas) in an evaporite karst setting and emphasize a link to the falling Dead Sea level.
Djamil Al-Halbouni, Eoghan P. Holohan, Abbas Taheri, Robert A. Watson, Ulrich Polom, Martin P. J. Schöpfer, Sacha Emam, and Torsten Dahm
Solid Earth, 10, 1219–1241, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1219-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1219-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
A 2-D numerical modelling approach to simulate the mechanical formation of sinkhole cluster inside large-scale karstic depressions is presented. Different multiple cavity growth scenarios at depth are compared regarding the mechanical process and collapse style. The outcomes of the models are compared to results from remote sensing and geophysics for an active sinkhole area in the Dead Sea region.
Cited articles
Abeyta, A., Fernandes, A., Mahon, R., and Swanson, T.: The True Cost of Field Education is a Barrier to Diversifying Geosciences, Earth ArXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.31223/X5BG70, 2021.
Achakulvisut, T., Ruangrong, T., Mineault, P., Vogels, T. P., Peters, M. A. K., Poirazi, P., Rozell, C., Wyble, B., Goodman, D. F. M., and Kording, K. P.: Towards Democratizing and Automating Online Conferences: Lessons from the Neuromatch Conferences, Trends Cogn. Sci., 25, 265–268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.01.007, 2021.
AGU: AGU Register & Attend webpage for the AGU23, https://www.agu.org/fall-meeting/pages/attend/register, last access: 1 December 2023.
AHEAD: Creating Inclusive Environments in Education and Employment for People with Disabilities: Accessible PowerPoint Presentations, https://ahead.ie/wam-remoteworking-resources-powerpoint, last access: 17 February 2023a.
AHEAD: Creating Inclusive Environments in Education and Employment for People with Disabilities: PowerPoint Presentation Accessibility Guidelines, https://www.ahead.ie/allyship-accessible-comms-presentation, last access: 17 February 2023b.
Allen, M.: Virtual conferences are more inclusive and greener, Phys. World, 35, 11i, https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/35/02/14, 2022.
Amarante, F. B. D. and Haag, M. B.: Earth Science for all? The economic barrier to Geoscience conferences, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1653, 2024.
Anderson, T.: The Virtual Conference: Extending Professional Education in Cyberspace, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 2, 121–135, 1996.
Bailenson, J. N.: Nonverbal Overload: A Theoretical Argument for the Causes of Zoom Fatigue, Technology, Mind, and Behavior, Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2, https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030, 2021.
Barrows, A. S., Sukhai, M. A., and Coe, I. R.: So, you want to host an inclusive and accessible conference?, FACETS, 6, 131–138, https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2020-0017, 2021.
Beilock, S.: How Diverse Teams Produce Better Outcomes, online blog, https://www.forbes.com/sites/sianbeilock/2019/04/04/how-diversity-leads-to-better-outcomes/ (last access: 15 September 2024), 2019.
Besner, L.: When Is a Caption Close Enough?, The Atlantic, https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/08/youtube-captions/595831/ (last access: 10 August 2022), 2019.
Bigg, C., Reinisch, J., Somsen, G., and Widmalm, S: The art of gathering: histories of international scientific conferences, Brit. J. Hist. Sci., 56, 423–433, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087423000638, 2023.
Black, A. L., Crimmins, G., Dwyer, R., and Lister, V.: Engendering belonging: thoughtful gatherings with/in online and virtual spaces, Gender Educ., 32, 115–129, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2019.1680808, 2020.
Blow, N. S.: Making the conference scene virtual, Biotechniques, 50, 203, https://doi.org/10.2144/000113642, 2011.
Busse, B. and Kleiber, I.: Realizing an online conference: Organization, management, tools, communication, and co-creation, Int. J. Corpus Linguis., 25, 322–346, https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00028.bus, 2020.
CART: Communication Access Realtime Translation, National Association of the Deaf, https://www.nad.org/resources/technology/captioning-for-access/communication-access-realtime-translation/, last access: 20 June 2024.
Chandler, J.: VGC 2016: Second Virtual Geoscience Conference, Photogramm. Rec., 21, 469–470, 2016.
Chatterjee, D.: How international conferences fail scholars from the global South: International Affairs Blog, https://medium.com/international-affairs-blog/how-international-conferences-fail-scholars-from-the-global-south-fbde14e5d1f1 (last access: 31 August 2023), 2022.
Chautard, A.: Inclusive conferences? We can and must do better – here's how, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/06/06/inclusive-conferences-we-can-and-must-do-better-heres-how/#:~:text=Many minorities also experience challenges,diversity should span beyond panels (last access: 1 November 2023), 2019.
Cooke, M., Child, C. R., Sibert, E. C., von Hagke, C., and Zihms, S. G.: Caption This! Best Practices for Live Captioning Presentations, Eos, 101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EO150246, 2022.
Correia, S.: Disadvantages of Online Events, https://blog.digitalnexa.com/disadvantages-of-online-events (last access: 31 August 2023), 2021.
Council of Ontario Universities: A Planning Guide for Accessible Conferences, How to organize and inclusive and accessible event, Online guide, ISBN: 0-88799-489-X, https://www.accessiblecampus.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/A-Planning-Guide-for-Accessible-Conferences.pdf, 2016.
de las Heras, A., Gómez-Varela, A. I., Tomás, M.-B., Perez-Herrera, R. A., Alberto Sánchez, L., Gallazzi, F., Santamaría Fernández, B., Garcia-Lechuga, M., Vinas-Pena, M., Delgado-Pinar, M., and González-Fernández, V.: Innovative Approaches for Organizing an Inclusive Optics and Photonics Conference in Virtual Format, Optics, 4, 156–170, https://doi.org/10.3390/opt4010012, 2023.
Dello Stritto, M. E. and Linder, K.: A Rising Tide: How Closed Captions Can Benefit All Students, https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/8/a-rising-tide-how-closed-captions-can-benefit-all-students (last access: 10 August 2022), 2017.
De Paor, D., Karabinos, P., Dickens, G., Atchison, C.: Color Vision Deficiency and the Geosciences, GSA Today, 27, 42–43, https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG322GW.1, 2016.
Distelmeyer, J.: Video conferencing as programmatic relations: conditions, consequences and mediality of Zoom & co., in: Video Conferencing: Infrastructures, Practices, Aesthetics, edited by: Volmar, A., Moskatova, O. and Distelmeyer, J., 1st edn., transcript Verlag (Digitale Gesellschaft), Bielefeld, Germany, https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839462287, 2023.
Dowey, N., Barclay, J., Fernando, B., Giles, S., Houghton, J., Jackson, C., Khatwa, A., Lawrence, A., Mills, K., Newton, A., Rogers, S., and Williams, R.: A UK perspective on tackling the geoscience racial diversity crisis in the Global North, Nat. Geosci., 14, 256–259, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00737-w, 2021.
Edig, F. J.: Equity, diversity and inclusion in Geoscience (EDIG) survey results, EDIG 2020 Conference, Online, 14–16 December 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Azt0_EELIc&t=1s (last access: 15 December 2023), 2020.
Ekandjo, H. and Belgrano, T.: Value for Value: End the Parachute Science Era, SEG Discovery, 128, 1–76, https://doi.org/10.5382/SEGnews.2022-128, 2022.
Erickson, T., Shami, S. N., Kellogg, W. A., and Levine, D. L.: Synchronous interaction among hundreds: an evaluation of a conference in an avatar-based virtual environment, in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI' 11), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 503–512, https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979013, 2011.
EOWG, Making Events Accessible: Checklist for meetings, conferences, training, and presentations that are remote/virtual, in-person, or hybrid, Education and Outreach Working Group (EOWG) online webpage developed with the WAI-AGE Project, https://www.w3.org/WAI/teach-advocate/accessible-presentations/ (last access: 21 June 2024), 2022.
Eventcube: How The Events Industry Has Adapted to COVID19 By Going Virtual (A Study), Online blog, https://www.eventcube.io/blog/how-the-events-industry-has-adapted-to-covid19-by-going-virtual, last access: 31 August 2023.
Eventforce: 8 Key Mistakes to Avoid When Planning Hybrid Events, Blog, https://www.eventsforce.com/blog/8-key-mistakes-to-avoid-when-planning-hybrid-events/, last access: 30 May 2024.
Federico, M. and Furini, M.: Enhancing Learning Accessibility through fully automatic captioning, in: International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A 2012), Lyon, France, 16–17 April 2012, https://doi.org/10.1145/2207016.2207053, 2012.
Felappi, G., Gregory, A., and Beebee, H.: Guidelines for Accessible Conferences – A guide by the British Philosophical Association and the Society for Women in Philosophy UK, British Philosophical Association, Online guide, https://bpa.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/BPA_SWIP-Guidelines-for-Accessible-Conferences.pdf (last access: 15 December 2023), 2017.
Fleming, N.: What's on the agenda for post-pandemic meetings?, Nature Careers Feature, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02254-z, 2020.
Foramitti, J., Drews, S., Klein, F., and Konc, T.: The virtues of virtual conferences, J. Clean. Prod., 294, 126287, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126287, 2021.
Fraser, H., Soanes, K., Jones, S. A., Jones, C. S., and Malishev, M.: The value of virtual conferencing for ecology and conservation, Conserv. Biol., 31, 540–546, https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12837, 2017.
Fu, Y. and Mahony, S.: Toward implementing equality, diversity, and inclusion for virtual conferences within the LIS professions, J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 56, 728–742, https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231164145, 2023.
Fulcher, M. R., Bolton, M. L., Millican, M. D., Michalska-Smith, M. J., Dundore-Arias, J. P., Handelsman, J., Klassen, J. L., Milligan-Myhre, K. C., Shade, A., Wolfe, B. E., and Kinkel, L. L.: Broadening Participation in Scientific Conferences during the Era of Social Distancing, Trends Microbiol., 28, 949–952, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2020.08.004, 2020.
Geocognition Research Laboratory (GRL): Limiting alcohol during professional events, Geocognition Research Laboratory, https://geocognitionresearchlaboratory.com/2020/07/02/limiting-alcohol-during-professional-events/ (last access: 17 February 2023), 2022.
Gibson, H., Illingworth, S., and Buiter, S.: The future of conferences: lessons from Europe's largest online geoscience conference, Geosci. Commun., 4, 437–451, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-437-2021, 2021.
Gichora, N. N., Fatumo, S. A., Ngara, M. V., Chelbat, N., Ramdayal, K., Opap, K. B., Opap, K. B., Siwo, G. H., Adebiyi, M. O., Gonnouni, A. E., Zofou, D., Maurady, A. A. M., Adebiyi, E. F., de Villiers, E. P., Masiga, D. K., Bizzaro, J. W., Suravajhala, P., Ommeh, S. C., and Hide, W.: Ten Simple Rules for Organizing a Virtual Conference – Anywhere, PLoS Comput. Biol., 6, e1000650, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000650, 2010.
Giles, S., Jackson, C., and Stephen, N.: Barriers to fieldwork in undergraduate geoscience degrees, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 77–78, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0022-5, 2020.
Golden, H.: History of DEI: The Evolution of Diversity Training Programs, online blog, https://www.ndnu.edu/history-of-dei-the-evolution-of-diversity-training-programs/ (last access: 12 September 2024), 2024.
Gomez, L. E. and Bernet, P.: Diversity improves performance and outcomes, J. Natl. Med. Assoc., 111, 383–392, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2019.01.006, 2019.
Gottlieb, M., Egan, D. J., Krzyzaniak, S. M., Wagner, J., Weizberg, M., and Chan, T.: Rethinking the Approach to Continuing Professional Development Conferences in the Era of COVID-19, J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof., 40, 187–191, https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000310, 2020.
Graham, S.: How COVID-19 Is Changing the Future of Virtual Events, Online blog, https://www.g2.com/articles/how-covid-19-is-changing-virtual-events, last access: 31 August 2023.
Greene, S., Antell, G., Atterby, J., Bhatia, R., Dunne, E., Giles, S., Groh, S., Hanson, E., Hilton, J., Knight, H., Kraftl, P., Morgan, E., Rhodes, I., Rockey, F., Singh, S., Stevenson, C., Sun, S., Warren, B., Wheeley, J., and Yamoah, K.: Safety and belonging in the field: a checklist for educators, Earth ArXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.31223/x53p6h, 2021.
Gunawardena, C. N., Nolla, A. C., Wilson, P. L., Lopez-Islas, J. R., Ramirez-Angel, N., and Megchun-Alpizar, R. M.: A cross-cultural study of group process and development in online conferences, Distance Educ., 22, 85–121, https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220106, 2001.
Harabor, D. and Vallati, M.: Organising a Successful AI Online Conference: Lessons from SoCS 2020, Online conference, 26–28 May 2020.
Heim, M.: Humanistic Discussion and the Online Conference, Philos, Today, 30, 278–288, doi:10.5840/philtoday198630417, 1986.
Hundschell, A., Razinskas, S., Backmann, J., and Hoegl, M.: The effects of diversity on creativity: A literature review and synthesis, Appl. Psychol., 71, 1598–1634, https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.1236, 2022.
Huntoon, J. E., Tanenbaum, C., and Hodges, J.: Increasing Diversity in the Geosciences, https://eos.org/science-updates/increasing-diversity-in-the-geosciences (last access: 24 February 2023), 2015.
IDEA Inclusive AD Forum: Self-description for inclusive meetings, Royal Holloway University of London and VocalEyes, https://vocaleyes.co.uk/services/resources/digital-accessibility-and-inclusion/self-description-for-inclusive-meetings/ (last access: 17 February 2023), 2021.
Jackson, C. A. L.: Using alt text to make science Twitter more accessible for people with visual impairments, Nat. Commun., 11, 5803, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19640-w, 2020.
Jain, V.: Virtual And Hybrid Events Are More Than Just A Covid-Era Fix, Forbes Council Blog, https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2022/12/20/virtual-and-hybrid-events-are-more-than-just-a-covid-era-fix/ (last access: 31 August 2023), 2022.
Kamalnath, A.: Diversity quotas will only lead to token appointments, doing more harm than good, Online article, the Conversation, https://theconversation.com/diversity-quotas-will-only-lead-to-token-appointments-doing-more-harm-than-good-132244 (last access: 31 August 2023), 2020.
King, M. and Kovács, B.: Research: We're Losing Touch with Our Networks, Online article, https://hbr.org/2021/02/research-were-losing-touch-with-our-networks, last access: 31 May 2024.
Kingsbury, C. G., Sibert, E. C., Killingback, Z., and Atchison, C. L.: “Nothing about us without us”: The perspectives of autistic geoscientists on inclusive instructional practices in geoscience education, J. Geosci. Educ., 68, 302–310, https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2020.1768017, 2020.
Kohler, T.: Accessibility and Inclusivity: Study Guide, Online blog, https://www.nngroup.com/articles/accessibility-inclusivity-study-guide/ (last access: 31 May 2024), 2023.
Kousha, K., Thelwall, M., and Bickley, M.: The high scholarly value of grey literature before and during Covid-19, Scientometrics, 127, 3489–3504, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04398-3, 2022.
Kukoyi, S.: Zoom Fatigue and Neurodiversity, Online blog, https://lexxic.com/blog/zoom-fatigue-and-neurodiversity, last access: 31 August 2023.
Leduc, J.: The Problem with Using Auto-Captions in Education, 3PlayMedia: https://www.3playmedia.com/blog/problem-using-auto-captions-education/#:~:text=At its best, ASR can,mispronunciations, and excellent audio quality (last access: 10 August 2022), 2020.
Lewis, M., Grimmett, H., Lipton, B., Walsh, S. C., Bickel, B., Elsom, S., Elsom, S., Westacott, M., Green, C., and Walker, A.: A Tapestried Review of the Fully-virtual, Non-traditional (Un) conference “MAKING shiFt HAPPEN: Female Academics Creating Personal and Professional Alchemy in the Academy”, Co-convened by Alison Black and Rachael Dwyer, Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal, 4, 695–711, https://doi.org/10.18432/ari29504, 2019.
Li, L. M., Bourke, N. J., Lai, H. H. L., May, H. G., Zimmerman, K. A., Bell, J., Riches, E., Abu-Sway, S., and Sharp, D. J.: Conferences in the time of COVID: notes on organizing and delivering the first Brain Conference, Brain Commun., 3, fcab142, https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab142, 2021.
Marín-Spiotta, E., Barnes, R. T., Berhe, A. A., Hastings, M. G., Mattheis, A., Schneider, B., and Williams, B. M.: Hostile climates are barriers to diversifying the geosciences, Adv. Geosci., 53, 117–127, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-53-117-2020, 2020.
Margetis, G., Ntoa, S., Bouhli, M., and Stephanidis, C.: An Accessible Platform for Conference Administration and Management, in: Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services, edited by: Stephanidis, C., UAHCI 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4556, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73283-9_102, 2007.
Marks, G. S.: How to Make Professional Conferences More Accessible for Disabled People: Guidance from Actual Disabled Scientists, Online article, https://blog.ucsusa.org/science-blogger/how-to-make-professional-conferences-more-accessible-for-disabled-people-guidance-from-actual-disabled-scientists/ (last access: 31 May 2024), 2018.
Moreira, C., Simões, F. P. M., Lee, M. J. W., Zorzal, E. R., Lindeman, R. W., Pereira, J. M., Johnsen, K., and Jorge, J.: Toward VR in VR: Assessing Engagement and Social Interaction in a Virtual Conference, IEEE Access, 11, 1906–1922, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3233312, 2022.
Nahass, E.: Zoom vs. Neurodivergency, Online blog, https://swarthmorephoenix.com/2022/02/10/zoom-vs-neurodivergency/ (last access: 31 August 2023), 2022.
Niner, H. J. and Wassermann, S. N.: Better for Whom? Leveling the Injustices of International Conferences by Moving Online, Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 638025, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.638025, 2021.
Niner, H. J., Johri, S., Meyer, J., and Wasswemann, S. N.: The pandemic push: can COVID-19 reinvent conferences to models rooted in sustainability, equitability and inclusion?, Socio-Ecol. Pract. Res., 2, 253–256, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-020-00059-y, 2020.
Nocon, A.: How to Make your Panel Event Neuroinclusive for Speakers, https://www.expandthecircle.co.uk/neurodiversity-blog/make-your-panel-neuroinclusive (last access: 2 November 2023), 2021.
Olcott, A. N. and Downen, M. R.: The Challenges of Fieldwork for LGBTQ+ Geoscientists, Eos, 101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EO148200, 2020.
Pedaste, M. and Kasemets, M.: Challenges in Organizing Online Conferences: Lessons of the COVID-19 Era, Educ. Technol. Soc., 24, 92–104, 2021.
Periyasamy, A. G., Singh, A., and Ravindra, K.: Carbon Emissions from Virtual and Physical Modes of Conference and Prospects for Carbon Neutrality: An Analysis From India, Air, Soil and Water Research, 15, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1177/11786221221093298, 2022.
Pickering, R. and Khosa, R.: The geological period that no one talks about: menstruation in the field, EGU Blog, https://blogs.egu.eu/geolog/2023/05/12/the-geological-period-that-no-one-talks-about-menstruation-in-the-field/, last access: 31 August 2023.
Pronouns.org: Mistakes – what if someone makes mistake and mispronouns someone else?, https://pronouns.org/mistakes, last access: 1 December 2023.
Quinan, C. L. and Hunt, M.: Non-binary gender markers: Mobility, migration, and media reception in Europe and beyond, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 30, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068211024891, 2021.
Raby, C. and Madden, J.: Moving academic conferences online: Aids and barriers to delegate participation, Ecol. Evol., 11, 3646–3655, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7376, 2021.
Reshef, O., Aharonovich, I., Armani, A. M., Gigan, S., Grange, R., Kats, M. A., and Sapienza, R.: How to organize an online conference, Nat. Rev. Mater., 5, 253–256, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-0194-0, 2020.
Rev: Closed Captions vs. Subtitles: What's the Difference?, https://www.rev.com/blog/subtitles-vs-captions (last access: 30 September 2024), 2021.
Rowe, N. E.: The Economic Cost of Attending Educational Conferences, International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 1, 30–42, 2019.
Sang, K.: Without accessible conferences, we lose the voices of disabled academics, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2017/aug/31/without-accessible-conferences-we-lose-the-voices-of-disabled-academics (last access: 18 May 2022), 2017.
Sarabipour, S.: Research Culture: Virtual conferences raise standards for accessibility and interactions, eLife, 9, e62668, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62668, 2020.
Savage, R. and Banerji, A.: Passport to acceptance? LGBTQ+ travellers wary about gender-neutral IDs, https://www.openlynews.com/i/?id=612e0cd6-55e7-4369-9c1d-6966bf525864 (last access: 6 December 2023), 2022.
Seery, M. K. and Flaharty, A. A.: Ten Tips for Running an Online Conference, J. Chem. Educ., 97, 2779–2782, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00833, 2020.
Signé, L.: Fixing the global digital divide and digital access gap, Online blog, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/fixing-the-global-digital-divide-and-digital-access-gap/ (last access: 31 May 2024), 2023.
Spinellis, D. and Louridas, P.: The Carbon Footprint of Conference Papers, PLoS ONE, 8, e66508, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066508, 2013.
Stefanoudis, P. V., Licuanan, W. Y., Morrison, T. H., Talma, S., Veitayaki, J., and Woodall, L. C.: Turning the tide of parachute science, Curr. Biol., 31, R161–R185, 2021.
Stokes, A., Feig, A. D., Atchison, C. L., and Gilley, B.: Making geoscience fieldwork inclusive and accessible for students with disabilities, Geosphere, 15, 1809–1825, https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02006.1, 2019.
Swartz, T. H., Palermo, A. S., Masur, S. K., and Aberg, J. A.: The Science and Value of Diversity: Closing the Gaps in Our Understanding of Inclusion and Diversity, J. Infect. Dis., 220, S33–S41, https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz174, 2019.
Talavera-Soza, S.: Citizenship a determining factor in a geoscientist's career, Nat. Geosci., 16, 550–551, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01221-3, 2023.
Tao, Y., Steckel, D., Klemeš, J. J., and You, F.: Trend towards virtual and hybrid conferences may be an effective climate change mitigation strategy, Nat. Commun., 12, 7324, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27251-2, 2021.
Thatcher, A.: Building and maintaining an online academic conference series, Int. J. Ind. Ergonom., 26, 1081–1088, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2006.09.009, 2006.
Vasquez, K.: Virtual Conferences Aren't as Accessible as You Might Think, Scientific American, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/virtual-conferences-arent-as-accessible-as-you-might-think/ (last access: 23 June 2022), 2021.
Waruru, M.: African and Asian researchers are hampered by visa problems, Nature News, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06750-1, 2018.
Wickline, M.: Coblis – Color Blindness Simulator: Online tool by Colblinder, https://www.color-blindness.com/coblis-color-blindness-simulator/ (last access: 10 February 2023), 2001.
Wiederhold B. K.: Connecting through technology during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Avoiding “Zoom fatigue.”, Cyberpsych. Beh. Soc. N., 23, 437–438, https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.29188.bkw, 2020.
Wu, J., Rajesh, A., Huang, Y. N., Huang, Y. N., Chhugani, K., Acharya, R., Peng, K., Johnson, R. D., Fiscutean, A., Robles-Espinoza, C. D., De La Vega, F. M., Bao, R., and Mangul, S.: Virtual meetings promise to eliminate geographical and administrative barriers and increase accessibility, diversity and inclusivity, Nat. Biotechnol., 40, 133–137, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01176-z, 2022.
Zhang, J., Torchet, R., and Julienne, H.: Gender-based disparities and biases in science: An observational study of a virtual conference, PLoS ONE, 18, e0286811, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286811, 2023.
Short summary
In recent years, we have seen a global change in how we communicate, with an unplanned shift to virtual platforms, leading to inadvertent exclusion during online events. This article aims to provide guidance on planning online/hybrid events from an accessibility viewpoint, based on the combined experiences of several groups and individuals. Nevertheless, this is not a fully comprehensive guide, as every event is unique and has its own accessibility design needs.
In recent years, we have seen a global change in how we communicate, with an unplanned shift to...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint