Articles | Volume 5, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-11-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-11-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
GC Insights: Identifying conditions that sculpted bedforms – human insights to building an effective AI (artificial intelligence)
Geography and Environment, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE1 3TU, UK
Chris Unsworth
School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, LL59 5AB, UK
Luke De Clerk
Physics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE1 3TU, UK
Sergey Savel'ev
Physics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE1 3TU, UK
Related authors
Ulrike Proske, John Hillier, Stefan Gaillard, Theresa Blume, Eduardo Queiroz Alves, Susanne Buiter, Ken S. Carslaw, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, Tim H. M. van Emmerik, Barbara Ervens, Rolf Hut, Sam Illingworth, Daniel Klotz, and Jonas Pyschik
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-987, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-987, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscience Communication (GC).
Short summary
Short summary
We explain a new article type that is being introduced in participating EGU publications. "LESSONS" articles describe the Limitations, Errors, Surprises, Shortcomings and Opportunities for New Science emerging from the scientific process. The publication of non-positive results and associated learnings aims to complete an unbiased record of the research effort, contributes to open and transparent science, allows the authors and others to learn, and may open opportunities for new science.
Shahzad Gani, Louise Arnal, Lucy Beattie, John Hillier, Sam Illingworth, Tiziana Lanza, Solmaz Mohadjer, Karoliina Pulkkinen, Heidi Roop, Iain Stewart, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, and Stephanie Zihms
Geosci. Commun., 7, 251–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Science communication in geosciences has societal and scientific value but often operates in “shadowlands”. This editorial highlights these issues and proposes potential solutions. Our objective is to create a transparent and responsible geoscience communication landscape, fostering scientific progress, the well-being of scientists, and societal benefits.
John Hillier, Adrian Champion, Tom Perkins, Freya Garry, and Hannah Bloomfield
Geosci. Commun., 7, 195–200, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-195-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-195-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To allow for more effective use of climate science, this work proposes and evaluates an open-access R code that deploys a measure of how natural hazards (e.g. extreme wind and flooding) co-occur, is obtainable from scientific research and is usable in practice without restricted data (climate or risk) being exposed. The approach can be applied to hazards in various sectors (e.g. road, rail and telecommunications).
John K. Hillier and Michiel van Meeteren
Geosci. Commun., 7, 35–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-35-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-35-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Co-RISK is a workshop-based
toolkitto aid the co-creation of joint projects in various sectors (e.g. insurance, rail, power generation) impacted by natural hazard risks. There is a genuine need to quickly convert the latest insights from environmental research into real-world climate change adaptation strategies, and a gap exists for an accessible (i.e. open access, low tech, zero cost) and practical solution tailored to assist with this.
John K. Hillier, Katharine E. Welsh, Mathew Stiller-Reeve, Rebecca K. Priestley, Heidi A. Roop, Tiziana Lanza, and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 4, 493–506, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this editorial we expand upon the brief advice in the first editorial of Geoscience Communication (Illingworth et al., 2018), illustrating what constitutes robust and publishable work for this journal and elucidating its key elements. Our aim is to help geoscience communicators plan a route to publication and to illustrate how good engagement work that is already being done might be developed into publishable research.
Ulrike Proske, John Hillier, Stefan Gaillard, Theresa Blume, Eduardo Queiroz Alves, Susanne Buiter, Ken S. Carslaw, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, Tim H. M. van Emmerik, Barbara Ervens, Rolf Hut, Sam Illingworth, Daniel Klotz, and Jonas Pyschik
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-987, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-987, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscience Communication (GC).
Short summary
Short summary
We explain a new article type that is being introduced in participating EGU publications. "LESSONS" articles describe the Limitations, Errors, Surprises, Shortcomings and Opportunities for New Science emerging from the scientific process. The publication of non-positive results and associated learnings aims to complete an unbiased record of the research effort, contributes to open and transparent science, allows the authors and others to learn, and may open opportunities for new science.
Martin J. Austin, Christopher A. Unsworth, Katrien J. J. Van Landeghem, and Ben J. Lincoln
Ocean Sci., 21, 81–91, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-81-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-81-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Novel hydrodynamic observations 40 m from an offshore wind turbine monopile show that the turbulent tidal lee wake doubles the drag acting on the seabed, potentially enhancing sediment transport and impacting the seabed habitat and the organisms that utilise it. It also enhances the vertical mixing of the water column, which drives the transport of heat, nutrients and oxygen. As offshore wind farms rapidly expand into deeper waters, array-scale wakes may have significant ecological impacts.
Shahzad Gani, Louise Arnal, Lucy Beattie, John Hillier, Sam Illingworth, Tiziana Lanza, Solmaz Mohadjer, Karoliina Pulkkinen, Heidi Roop, Iain Stewart, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, and Stephanie Zihms
Geosci. Commun., 7, 251–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Science communication in geosciences has societal and scientific value but often operates in “shadowlands”. This editorial highlights these issues and proposes potential solutions. Our objective is to create a transparent and responsible geoscience communication landscape, fostering scientific progress, the well-being of scientists, and societal benefits.
John Hillier, Adrian Champion, Tom Perkins, Freya Garry, and Hannah Bloomfield
Geosci. Commun., 7, 195–200, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-195-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-195-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To allow for more effective use of climate science, this work proposes and evaluates an open-access R code that deploys a measure of how natural hazards (e.g. extreme wind and flooding) co-occur, is obtainable from scientific research and is usable in practice without restricted data (climate or risk) being exposed. The approach can be applied to hazards in various sectors (e.g. road, rail and telecommunications).
John K. Hillier and Michiel van Meeteren
Geosci. Commun., 7, 35–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-35-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-35-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Co-RISK is a workshop-based
toolkitto aid the co-creation of joint projects in various sectors (e.g. insurance, rail, power generation) impacted by natural hazard risks. There is a genuine need to quickly convert the latest insights from environmental research into real-world climate change adaptation strategies, and a gap exists for an accessible (i.e. open access, low tech, zero cost) and practical solution tailored to assist with this.
John K. Hillier, Katharine E. Welsh, Mathew Stiller-Reeve, Rebecca K. Priestley, Heidi A. Roop, Tiziana Lanza, and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 4, 493–506, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this editorial we expand upon the brief advice in the first editorial of Geoscience Communication (Illingworth et al., 2018), illustrating what constitutes robust and publishable work for this journal and elucidating its key elements. Our aim is to help geoscience communicators plan a route to publication and to illustrate how good engagement work that is already being done might be developed into publishable research.
Cited articles
Allen, J. R. L.: Their Relation to Patterns of Water and Sediment Motion, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 433 pp., https://doi.org/10.1017/S001675680005946X, 1968.
Bishop, C. M.: Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Oxford University
Press, 1st edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 502 pp., ISBN 9780-198538646, 1996.
Bullard, J., White, K., and Livingstone, I.: Morphometric analysis of
aeolian bedforms in the Namib Sand Sea using ASTER data, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 36, 1534–1549,
2011.
Duran Vinet, O. D., Adreiotti, B., Claudin, P., and Winter, C.: A unified
model of ripples and dunes in water and planetary environments, Nat. Geosci., 12,
345–350, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0336-4, 2019.
Edgett, K. S. and Lancaster, N.: Volcaniclastic aeolian dunes: terrestrial
examples and application to martian sands, J. Arid Environ., 25, 271–297,
https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.1993.1061, 1993.
Einstein, H.: Der Geschiebetrieb als Wahrschein-lichkeitproblem, in: Sedimentation (Symposium to honor H. A.
Einstein), edited by: Shen, H. W. [English translation: Bedload transport as a probability problem, edited
by: W. W. Sayre] Fort Collins, Colorado, 1972,
C1–C105, Zurich: ETHZ, 1937.
Faruk, D. Ö.: A hybrid neural network and ARIMA model for water quality
time series prediction, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel., 23, 586–594,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2009.09.015, 2010.
Fowler, A. C.: Evolution equations for dunes and drumlins, Racsam. Rev. R. Acad. A., 96, 377–387, 2002.
Froehlich, D. C.: Neural Network Prediction of Alluvial Stream Bedforms, J. Hydrol. Eng., 146, 04020084, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001831, 2020.
Hillier, J. K.: Pacific seamount volcanism in space and time, Geophys. J. Inter., 168, 877–889, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03250.x, 2006.
Hillier, J. K.: Seamount detection and isolation with a modified wavelet transform, Basin Res., 20, 555–573, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2008.00382.x, 2008.
Hillier, J. K. and Smith, M.: Residual relief separation: digital elevation
model enhancement for geomorphological mapping, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 33, 2266–2276, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1659, 2008.
Hillier, J. K., Kougioumtzoglou, I. A., Stokes, C. R., Smith, M. J., and
Clark, C. D.: Exploring explanations of subglacial bedform sizes using
statistical models, Plos ONE, 11, e0159489,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159489, 2016.
Hillier, J. K., Benediktsson, Í. Ö., Dowling, T. P. F., and
Schomacker, A.: Production and preservation of the smallest drumlins, GFF, 140, 91–92, https://doi.org/10.1080/11035897.2018.1457714, 2018.
King, E. C., Hindmarsh, R. C. A., and Stokes, C. R.: Formation of mega-scale
glacial lineations observed beneath a west Antarctic ice stream, Nat. Geosci., 2, 585–596, 2009.
Leary, K. C. P. and Ganti, V.: Preserved Fluvial Cross Strata Record Bedform
Disequilibrium Dynamics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, 1–11, 2020.
Lewis, D. W. and McConchie, D. M.: Practical sedimentology, 2nd ed., Springer, US, 212 pp., ISBN 9780-442012175, 1994.
Myrow, P. M., Jerolmack, D. J., and Perron, J. T.: Bedform Disequilibrium, J. Sediment. Res., 88, 1096–1113, https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2018.55, 2018.
Ohata, K., Naruse, H., Yokokawa, M., and Viparelli, E.: New Bedform Phase
Diagrams and Discriminant Functions for Formative Conditions of Bedforms in
Open-Channel Flows, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 122, 2139–2158, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JF004290,
2017.
Shaw, J.: Drumlin formation related to inverted melt-water erosional marks, J. Glaciol., 29, 461–479, 1983.
Shumack, S., Hesse, P., and Farebrother, W.: Deep learning for dune pattern
mapping with the AW3D30 global surface model, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 45, 2417–2431,
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4888, 2020.
Sofia, G., Hillier, J. K., and Conway, S. J.: Frontiers in Geomorphometry and Earth Surface Dynamics: possibilities, limitations and perspectives, Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 721–725, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-721-2016, 2016.
Southard, J. B. and Boguchwal, L. A.: Bed configurations in steady
unidirectional water flow part 2, Synthesis of flume data, J. Sediment. Petrol., 60, 658–679,
1990.
Storrar, R. and Stokes, C. R.: A glacial geomorphological map of Victoria
Island, Canadian Arctic, J. Maps, 3, 191–201,
https://doi.org/10.1080/jom.2007.9710838, 2007.
Unsworth, C.: River Dunes in Unsteady Conditions, PhD, University of Hull, GB, available at: https://hydra.hull.ac.uk/assets/hull:13096a/content, 2015.
Valentine, A. and Kalnins, L.: An introduction to learning algorithms and potential applications in geomorphometry and Earth surface dynamics, Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 445–460, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-445-2016, 2016.
Venditti, J. G.: Bedforms in Sand-Bedded Rivers, in: Treatise on
Geomorphology, edited by: Shroder, J. and Wohl, E., Elsevier, 137–162, ISBN 9780-123747396, 2012.
Wang, W., Chau, K., Cheng, C., and Qui, L.: A comparison of performance of
several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge
time series, J. Hydrol., 374, 294–306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.019,
2009.
Short summary
It is an aspiration to infer flow conditions from bedform morphology (e.g. riverbed ripples) where sedimentary structures preserve the geological past or in inaccessible environments (e.g. Mars). This study was motivated by the idea of better designing an AI (artificial intelligence) algorithm to do this by using lessons from non-AI (i.e. human) abilities, investigated using a geoscience communication activity. A survey and an artificial neural network are used in a successful proof of concept.
It is an aspiration to infer flow conditions from bedform morphology (e.g. riverbed ripples)...
Special issue
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint