Articles | Volume 5, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-11-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-11-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
GC Insights: Identifying conditions that sculpted bedforms – human insights to building an effective AI (artificial intelligence)
Geography and Environment, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE1 3TU, UK
Chris Unsworth
School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, LL59 5AB, UK
Luke De Clerk
Physics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE1 3TU, UK
Sergey Savel'ev
Physics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE1 3TU, UK
Related authors
Shahzad Gani, Louise Arnal, Lucy Beattie, John Hillier, Sam Illingworth, Tiziana Lanza, Solmaz Mohadjer, Karoliina Pulkkinen, Heidi Roop, Iain Stewart, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, and Stephanie Zihms
Geosci. Commun., 7, 251–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Science communication in geosciences has societal and scientific value but often operates in “shadowlands”. This editorial highlights these issues and proposes potential solutions. Our objective is to create a transparent and responsible geoscience communication landscape, fostering scientific progress, the well-being of scientists, and societal benefits.
John Hillier, Adrian Champion, Tom Perkins, Freya Garry, and Hannah Bloomfield
Geosci. Commun., 7, 195–200, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-195-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-195-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To allow for more effective use of climate science, this work proposes and evaluates an open-access R code that deploys a measure of how natural hazards (e.g. extreme wind and flooding) co-occur, is obtainable from scientific research and is usable in practice without restricted data (climate or risk) being exposed. The approach can be applied to hazards in various sectors (e.g. road, rail and telecommunications).
John K. Hillier and Michiel van Meeteren
Geosci. Commun., 7, 35–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-35-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-35-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Co-RISK is a workshop-based
toolkitto aid the co-creation of joint projects in various sectors (e.g. insurance, rail, power generation) impacted by natural hazard risks. There is a genuine need to quickly convert the latest insights from environmental research into real-world climate change adaptation strategies, and a gap exists for an accessible (i.e. open access, low tech, zero cost) and practical solution tailored to assist with this.
John K. Hillier, Katharine E. Welsh, Mathew Stiller-Reeve, Rebecca K. Priestley, Heidi A. Roop, Tiziana Lanza, and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 4, 493–506, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this editorial we expand upon the brief advice in the first editorial of Geoscience Communication (Illingworth et al., 2018), illustrating what constitutes robust and publishable work for this journal and elucidating its key elements. Our aim is to help geoscience communicators plan a route to publication and to illustrate how good engagement work that is already being done might be developed into publishable research.
John K. Hillier, Geoffrey R. Saville, Mike J. Smith, Alister J. Scott, Emma K. Raven, Jonathon Gascoigne, Louise J. Slater, Nevil Quinn, Andreas Tsanakas, Claire Souch, Gregor C. Leckebusch, Neil Macdonald, Alice M. Milner, Jennifer Loxton, Rebecca Wilebore, Alexandra Collins, Colin MacKechnie, Jaqui Tweddle, Sarah Moller, MacKenzie Dove, Harry Langford, and Jim Craig
Geosci. Commun., 2, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-1-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-1-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Worldwide there is intense interest in converting research excellence in universities into commercial success, but there has been scant attention devoted to exactly how individual scientists' workload and incentive structures may be a key barrier to this. Our work reveals the real challenge posed by a time-constrained university culture, better describes how work with business might fit into an academic job, and gives tips on working together in an
user guidefor scientists and (re)insurers.
Giulia Sofia, John K. Hillier, and Susan J. Conway
Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 721–725, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-721-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-721-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The interdisciplinarity of geomorphometry is its greatest strength and one of its major challenges. This special issue showcases exciting developments that are the building blocks for the next step-change in the field. In reading and compiling the contributions we hope that the scientific community will be inspired to seek out collaborations and share ideas across subject-boundaries, between technique-developers and users, enabling us as a community to gather knowledge from our digital landscape
J. K. Hillier, G. Sofia, and S. J. Conway
Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 587–598, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-587-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-587-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
How good are measurements of shapes in the landscape? This is not well constrained. We suggest that "synthetic tests" using constructed digital landscapes called synthetic DEMs are a powerful and necessary tool to establish the reliability of these data (e.g. mapped sizes). Thus, the tests have a key, complementary role in determining if conceptual and physics-driven models of processes can be reconciled with morphological observations of reality. A typology of synthetic DEMs is proposed.
Shahzad Gani, Louise Arnal, Lucy Beattie, John Hillier, Sam Illingworth, Tiziana Lanza, Solmaz Mohadjer, Karoliina Pulkkinen, Heidi Roop, Iain Stewart, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, and Stephanie Zihms
Geosci. Commun., 7, 251–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Science communication in geosciences has societal and scientific value but often operates in “shadowlands”. This editorial highlights these issues and proposes potential solutions. Our objective is to create a transparent and responsible geoscience communication landscape, fostering scientific progress, the well-being of scientists, and societal benefits.
John Hillier, Adrian Champion, Tom Perkins, Freya Garry, and Hannah Bloomfield
Geosci. Commun., 7, 195–200, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-195-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-195-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To allow for more effective use of climate science, this work proposes and evaluates an open-access R code that deploys a measure of how natural hazards (e.g. extreme wind and flooding) co-occur, is obtainable from scientific research and is usable in practice without restricted data (climate or risk) being exposed. The approach can be applied to hazards in various sectors (e.g. road, rail and telecommunications).
Martin J. Austin, Christopher A. Unsworth, Katrien J. J. Van Landeghem, and Ben J. Lincoln
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2056, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2056, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Novel hydrodynamic observations 40 m away from an offshore wind turbine monopile show that the turbulent tidal wake doubles the drag acting on the seabed, potentially enhancing sediment transport and impacting the seabed and the organisms that utilise it. It also enhances the vertical mixing of seawater, which drives the transport of heat, nutrients and oxygen. As offshore wind farms rapidly expand into deeper waters, array-scale wakes may have significant ecological impacts on our oceans.
John K. Hillier and Michiel van Meeteren
Geosci. Commun., 7, 35–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-35-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-35-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Co-RISK is a workshop-based
toolkitto aid the co-creation of joint projects in various sectors (e.g. insurance, rail, power generation) impacted by natural hazard risks. There is a genuine need to quickly convert the latest insights from environmental research into real-world climate change adaptation strategies, and a gap exists for an accessible (i.e. open access, low tech, zero cost) and practical solution tailored to assist with this.
John K. Hillier, Katharine E. Welsh, Mathew Stiller-Reeve, Rebecca K. Priestley, Heidi A. Roop, Tiziana Lanza, and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 4, 493–506, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this editorial we expand upon the brief advice in the first editorial of Geoscience Communication (Illingworth et al., 2018), illustrating what constitutes robust and publishable work for this journal and elucidating its key elements. Our aim is to help geoscience communicators plan a route to publication and to illustrate how good engagement work that is already being done might be developed into publishable research.
John K. Hillier, Geoffrey R. Saville, Mike J. Smith, Alister J. Scott, Emma K. Raven, Jonathon Gascoigne, Louise J. Slater, Nevil Quinn, Andreas Tsanakas, Claire Souch, Gregor C. Leckebusch, Neil Macdonald, Alice M. Milner, Jennifer Loxton, Rebecca Wilebore, Alexandra Collins, Colin MacKechnie, Jaqui Tweddle, Sarah Moller, MacKenzie Dove, Harry Langford, and Jim Craig
Geosci. Commun., 2, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-1-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-1-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Worldwide there is intense interest in converting research excellence in universities into commercial success, but there has been scant attention devoted to exactly how individual scientists' workload and incentive structures may be a key barrier to this. Our work reveals the real challenge posed by a time-constrained university culture, better describes how work with business might fit into an academic job, and gives tips on working together in an
user guidefor scientists and (re)insurers.
Giulia Sofia, John K. Hillier, and Susan J. Conway
Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 721–725, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-721-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-721-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The interdisciplinarity of geomorphometry is its greatest strength and one of its major challenges. This special issue showcases exciting developments that are the building blocks for the next step-change in the field. In reading and compiling the contributions we hope that the scientific community will be inspired to seek out collaborations and share ideas across subject-boundaries, between technique-developers and users, enabling us as a community to gather knowledge from our digital landscape
J. K. Hillier, G. Sofia, and S. J. Conway
Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 587–598, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-587-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-587-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
How good are measurements of shapes in the landscape? This is not well constrained. We suggest that "synthetic tests" using constructed digital landscapes called synthetic DEMs are a powerful and necessary tool to establish the reliability of these data (e.g. mapped sizes). Thus, the tests have a key, complementary role in determining if conceptual and physics-driven models of processes can be reconciled with morphological observations of reality. A typology of synthetic DEMs is proposed.
Related subject area
Subject: Geoscience engagement | Keyword: Co-creation and co-production
Development of forecast information for institutional decision-makers: landslides in India and cyclones in Mozambique
Rapid collaborative knowledge building via Twitter after significant geohazard events
Mirianna Budimir, Alison Sneddon, Issy Nelder, Sarah Brown, Amy Donovan, and Linda Speight
Geosci. Commun., 5, 151–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-151-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-151-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper extracts key learning from two case studies (India and Mozambique), outlining solutions and approaches to challenges in developing forecast products. These lessons and solutions can be used by forecasters and practitioners to support the development of useful, appropriate, and co-designed forecast information for institutional decision-makers to support more effective early action in advance of disasters.
Robin Lacassin, Maud Devès, Stephen P. Hicks, Jean-Paul Ampuero, Remy Bossu, Lucile Bruhat, Daryono, Desianto F. Wibisono, Laure Fallou, Eric J. Fielding, Alice-Agnes Gabriel, Jamie Gurney, Janine Krippner, Anthony Lomax, Muh. Ma'rufin Sudibyo, Astyka Pamumpuni, Jason R. Patton, Helen Robinson, Mark Tingay, and Sotiris Valkaniotis
Geosci. Commun., 3, 129–146, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-129-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-129-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Among social media platforms, Twitter is valued by scholars to disseminate scientific information. Using two 2018 geohazard events as examples, we show that collaborative open data sharing and discussion on Twitter promote very rapid building of knowledge. This breaks down the traditional
ivory towerof academia, making science accessible to nonacademics who can follow the discussion. It also presents the opportunity for a new type of scientific approach within global virtual teams.
Cited articles
Allen, J. R. L.: Their Relation to Patterns of Water and Sediment Motion, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 433 pp., https://doi.org/10.1017/S001675680005946X, 1968.
Bishop, C. M.: Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Oxford University
Press, 1st edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 502 pp., ISBN 9780-198538646, 1996.
Bullard, J., White, K., and Livingstone, I.: Morphometric analysis of
aeolian bedforms in the Namib Sand Sea using ASTER data, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 36, 1534–1549,
2011.
Duran Vinet, O. D., Adreiotti, B., Claudin, P., and Winter, C.: A unified
model of ripples and dunes in water and planetary environments, Nat. Geosci., 12,
345–350, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0336-4, 2019.
Edgett, K. S. and Lancaster, N.: Volcaniclastic aeolian dunes: terrestrial
examples and application to martian sands, J. Arid Environ., 25, 271–297,
https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.1993.1061, 1993.
Einstein, H.: Der Geschiebetrieb als Wahrschein-lichkeitproblem, in: Sedimentation (Symposium to honor H. A.
Einstein), edited by: Shen, H. W. [English translation: Bedload transport as a probability problem, edited
by: W. W. Sayre] Fort Collins, Colorado, 1972,
C1–C105, Zurich: ETHZ, 1937.
Faruk, D. Ö.: A hybrid neural network and ARIMA model for water quality
time series prediction, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel., 23, 586–594,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2009.09.015, 2010.
Fowler, A. C.: Evolution equations for dunes and drumlins, Racsam. Rev. R. Acad. A., 96, 377–387, 2002.
Froehlich, D. C.: Neural Network Prediction of Alluvial Stream Bedforms, J. Hydrol. Eng., 146, 04020084, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001831, 2020.
Hillier, J. K.: Pacific seamount volcanism in space and time, Geophys. J. Inter., 168, 877–889, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03250.x, 2006.
Hillier, J. K.: Seamount detection and isolation with a modified wavelet transform, Basin Res., 20, 555–573, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2008.00382.x, 2008.
Hillier, J. K. and Smith, M.: Residual relief separation: digital elevation
model enhancement for geomorphological mapping, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 33, 2266–2276, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1659, 2008.
Hillier, J. K., Kougioumtzoglou, I. A., Stokes, C. R., Smith, M. J., and
Clark, C. D.: Exploring explanations of subglacial bedform sizes using
statistical models, Plos ONE, 11, e0159489,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159489, 2016.
Hillier, J. K., Benediktsson, Í. Ö., Dowling, T. P. F., and
Schomacker, A.: Production and preservation of the smallest drumlins, GFF, 140, 91–92, https://doi.org/10.1080/11035897.2018.1457714, 2018.
King, E. C., Hindmarsh, R. C. A., and Stokes, C. R.: Formation of mega-scale
glacial lineations observed beneath a west Antarctic ice stream, Nat. Geosci., 2, 585–596, 2009.
Leary, K. C. P. and Ganti, V.: Preserved Fluvial Cross Strata Record Bedform
Disequilibrium Dynamics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, 1–11, 2020.
Lewis, D. W. and McConchie, D. M.: Practical sedimentology, 2nd ed., Springer, US, 212 pp., ISBN 9780-442012175, 1994.
Myrow, P. M., Jerolmack, D. J., and Perron, J. T.: Bedform Disequilibrium, J. Sediment. Res., 88, 1096–1113, https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2018.55, 2018.
Ohata, K., Naruse, H., Yokokawa, M., and Viparelli, E.: New Bedform Phase
Diagrams and Discriminant Functions for Formative Conditions of Bedforms in
Open-Channel Flows, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 122, 2139–2158, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JF004290,
2017.
Shaw, J.: Drumlin formation related to inverted melt-water erosional marks, J. Glaciol., 29, 461–479, 1983.
Shumack, S., Hesse, P., and Farebrother, W.: Deep learning for dune pattern
mapping with the AW3D30 global surface model, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 45, 2417–2431,
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4888, 2020.
Sofia, G., Hillier, J. K., and Conway, S. J.: Frontiers in Geomorphometry and Earth Surface Dynamics: possibilities, limitations and perspectives, Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 721–725, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-721-2016, 2016.
Southard, J. B. and Boguchwal, L. A.: Bed configurations in steady
unidirectional water flow part 2, Synthesis of flume data, J. Sediment. Petrol., 60, 658–679,
1990.
Storrar, R. and Stokes, C. R.: A glacial geomorphological map of Victoria
Island, Canadian Arctic, J. Maps, 3, 191–201,
https://doi.org/10.1080/jom.2007.9710838, 2007.
Unsworth, C.: River Dunes in Unsteady Conditions, PhD, University of Hull, GB, available at: https://hydra.hull.ac.uk/assets/hull:13096a/content, 2015.
Valentine, A. and Kalnins, L.: An introduction to learning algorithms and potential applications in geomorphometry and Earth surface dynamics, Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 445–460, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-445-2016, 2016.
Venditti, J. G.: Bedforms in Sand-Bedded Rivers, in: Treatise on
Geomorphology, edited by: Shroder, J. and Wohl, E., Elsevier, 137–162, ISBN 9780-123747396, 2012.
Wang, W., Chau, K., Cheng, C., and Qui, L.: A comparison of performance of
several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge
time series, J. Hydrol., 374, 294–306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.019,
2009.
Short summary
It is an aspiration to infer flow conditions from bedform morphology (e.g. riverbed ripples) where sedimentary structures preserve the geological past or in inaccessible environments (e.g. Mars). This study was motivated by the idea of better designing an AI (artificial intelligence) algorithm to do this by using lessons from non-AI (i.e. human) abilities, investigated using a geoscience communication activity. A survey and an artificial neural network are used in a successful proof of concept.
It is an aspiration to infer flow conditions from bedform morphology (e.g. riverbed ripples)...
Special issue
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint