Geoscience Communication
Geoscience Communication
GC
Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-303-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-303-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 4, issue 2
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
11 Jun 2021
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 11 Jun 2021

Fracking bad language – hydraulic fracturing and earthquake risks

Jennifer J. Roberts, Clare E. Bond, and Zoe K. Shipton

Viewed

Total article views: 4,742 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,731 921 90 4,742 53 49
  • HTML: 3,731
  • PDF: 921
  • XML: 90
  • Total: 4,742
  • BibTeX: 53
  • EndNote: 49
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Aug 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Aug 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,742 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,152 with geography defined and 590 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 12 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
The potential for hydraulic fracturing (fracking) to induce seismicity is a topic of widespread interest. We find that terms used to describe induced seismicity are poorly defined and ambiguous and do not translate into everyday language. Such bad language has led to challenges in understanding, perceiving, and communicating risks around seismicity and fracking. Our findings and recommendations are relevant to other geoenergy topics that are potentially associated with induced seismicity.
Read more
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint