Thank you to the authors for making significant changes to their manuscript to reflect the edits requested by the reviewers and the editor. I still suggest that the title be changed to provide clarity on the core content of the manuscript, which is a discussion of the approach, methods and outcomes of the Pole to Paris initiative, along with some suggestions for other scientist-communicators based on your lessons learned.

Thank you for engaging so thoroughly with the peer review process. As discussed by the editor, please can you provide a new title that clearly outlines the contents of the paper. "Communicating climate change in a "post-factual" society: Lessons learned from the Pole to Paris campaign" seems like an excellent suggestion, but please feel free to suggest something else that is equally as clear.

Once this has been done we will be delighted to publish your work in GC, and we would like to thank you again for your excellent research and your decision to share your work in our journal.

Many Thanks,

Sam Illingworth
(Chief Executive Editor)