Barnosky, A. D., Ehrlich, P. R., and Hadly, E. A.: Avoiding collapse: Grand
challenges for science and society to solve by 2050, Elem. Sci. Anth., 4, 000094, https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000094, 2016.
Bolin, B.: A history of the science and politics of climate change: The role
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University
Press, 1–292, ISBN 978-0-521-88082-4, 2007.
Bowman, S. R., Biermans, G., Hicks, A., Jevtić, Rodriguez-Gil, J. L.,
and Brockmeier, E. K.: A guide for using social media in environmental
science and a case, Environ. Sci. Eur., 27, 32,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-015-0062-5, 2015.
Boykoff, M., Daly, M., Fernández-Reyes, R., McAllister, L., McNatt, M.,
Nacu-Schmidt, A., Oonk, D., and Pearman, O.: World newspaper coverage of
climate change or global warming 2004–2018, Media and Climate Change
Observatory Data Sets, Center for Science and Technology Policy Research,
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of
Colorado, https://doi.org/10.25810/4c3b-b819, 2018.
Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., and Steinman, L.: Science communication to
the general public: why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students
this skill as part of their formal scientific training, J. Undergrad.
Neurosci. Educ., 12, E6–E10, 2013.
Brüggemann, M. and Engesser, S.: Beyond false balance: How interpretive
journalism shapes media coverage of climate change, Global Environ. Chang.,
42, 58–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.004, 2017.
Bucchi, M.: Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: Theories of public
communication of science, in: Handbook of public communication of science and
technology, 71–90, Routledge, Abingdon, UK, ISBN 978-0-415-38617-3, 2008.
Callon, M.: The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of
scientific knowledge, Sci. Technol. Soc., 4, 81–94,
https://doi.org/10.1177/097172189900400106, 1999.
Capstick, S., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., and Upham, P.:
International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past
quarter century, WIREs Clim. Change, 6, 35–61, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.321, 2015.
Carmichael, J. T., Brulle, R. J., and Huxster, J. K.: The great divide:
understanding the role of media and other drivers of the partisan divide in
public concern over climate change in the USA, 2001–2014, Climatic Change,
141, 599–612, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1908-1, 2017.
de Moor, J.: The “efficacy dilemma” of transnational climate activism: the
case of COP21, Environ. Polit., 27, 1079–1100,
https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1410315, 2018.
De Pryck, K. and Gemenne, F.: The denier-in-chief: climate change, science
and the election of Donald J. Trump, Law Critique, 28, 119–126,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-017-9207-6, 2017.
Drummond, A., Hall, L. C., Sauer, J. D., and Palmer, M. A.: Is public
awareness and perceived threat of climate change associated with
governmental mitigation targets?, Climatic Change, 149, 1–13,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2230-2, 2018.
Dunlap, R. E., McCright, A. M., and Yarosh, J. H.: The Political Divide on
Climate Change: Partisan Polarization Widens in the U.S., Environment:
Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 58, 4–23,
https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2016.1208995, 2016.
Fankhaeser, S., Sehlleier, F., and Stern, N: Climate change, innovation and
jobs, Clim. Policy, 8, 421–429, https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2008.0513, 2008.
Figueres, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Whiteman, G., Rockström, J., Hobley,
A., and Rahmstorf, S.: Three years to safeguard our climate, Nature, 546,
593–595, https://doi.org/10.1038/546593a, 2017.
Gauchat, G., O'Brien, T., and Mirosa, O.: The legitimacy of environmental
scientists in the public sphere, Climatic Change, 143, 297–306,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2015-z, 2017.
Hamilton, L. C.: Where is the North Pole? An election-year survey on global
change, The Carsey School of Public Policy at the Scholars' Repository, 285,
2016.
Knudsen, E. M. and de Bolsée, O. J.: Data used in “Communicating
climate change in a `post-factual' society: Lessons learned from the Pole to
Paris campaign” (Version 2) [Data set], Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2659211,
2019.
Kotcher, J. E., Myers, T. A., Vraga, E. K., Stenhouse, N., and Maibach, E.
W.: Does engagement in advocacy hurt the credibility of scientists? Results
from a randomized national survey experiment, Environ. Commun., 11,
415–429, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1275736, 2017.
Leshner, A. I.: Public engagement with science, Science, 299, 977,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.299.5609.977, 2003.
Leshner, A. I.: Outreach training needed, Science, 315, 161,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1138712, 2007.
Lorenzoni, I., Jones, M., and Turnpenny, J. R.: Climate change, human
genetics, and post-normality in the UK, Futures, 36, 65–82,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.03.005, 2007.
MacInnis, B., Krosnick, J. A., Abeles, A., Caldwell, M. R., Prahler, E., and
Dunne, D. D.: The American public's preference for preparation for the
possible effects of global warming: impact of communication strategies,
Climatic Change, 128, 17–33, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1286-x, 2015.
McCright, A. M. and Dunlap, R. E.: The politicization of climate change and
polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010,
Sociol. Quart., 52, 155–194, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x, 2011.
McSweeney, R.: Analysis: The most “cited” climate change papers, Rosamund
Pearce/Carbon Brief, available at:
https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-the-most-cited-climate-change-papers (last access: 16 January 2019),
2015.
Nisbet, M.: Scientists in civic life: facilitating dialogue-based
communication, American Association for the Advancement of Science, available at:
https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/s3fs-public/content_files/Scientists%2520in%2520Civic%2520Life
_FINAL%2520INTERACTIVE%2520082718.pdf (last access: 18 January 2019), 2018.
Nordhagen, S., Calverley, D., Foulds, C., O'Keefe, L., and Wang, X.: Climate
change research and credibility: balancing tensions across professional,
personal, and public domains, Climatic Change, 125, 149–162,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1167-3, 2014.
O'Neill, S. and Nicholson-Cole, S.: “Fear won't do it”: Promoting
positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic
representations, Sci. Commun., 30, 355–379, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201,
2009.
Paasche, Ø. and Åkesson, H.: Let's start teaching scientists how to
withstand attacks on fact, Eos, 100, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EO118499, 2019.
Pariser, E.: The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing
what we read and how we think, The Penguin Press, New York, USA,
ISBN 978-1-101-51512-9, 2011.
Pielke Jr., R. A.: The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and
politics, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, ISBN 978-0-521-87320-8,
2007.
Postel-Vinay, K.: How neo-nationalism went global, The Conversation,
available at:
http://theconversation.com/how-neo-nationalism-went-global-74095 (last access: 16 January 2019), 2017.
Rauser, F., Alqadi, M., Arowolo, S., Baker, N., Bedard, J., Behrens, E.,
Dogulu, N., Domingues, L. G., Frassoni, A., Keller, J., Kirkpatrick, S.,
Langendijk, G., Mirsafa, M., Mohammad, S., Naumann, A. K., Osman, M., Reed,
K., Rothmüller, M., Schemann, V., Singh, A., Sonntag, S., Tummon, F.,
Victor, D., Villafuerte, M. Q., Walawender, J. P., and Zaroug, M.: Earth
System Science Frontiers: An Early Career Perspective, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 98, 1119–1127, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0025.1, 2017.
Saad, L.: Global warming concern at three-decade high in U.S., Gallup,
available at:
https://news.gallup.com/poll/206030/global-warming-concern-three-decade-high.aspx (last access: 16 January 2019),
2017.
Schäfer, M. S., Füchslin, T., Metag, J., Kristiansen, S., and
Rauchfleisch, A.: The different audiences of science communication: A
segmentation analysis of the Swiss population's perceptions of science and
their information and media use patterns, Public Underst. Sci., 27, 1–21,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517752886, 2018.
Schmid-Petri, H.: Politicization of science: how climate change skeptics use
experts and scientific evidence in their online communication, Climatic
Change, 145, 523–537, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2112-z, 2017.
Stern, N.: The economics of climate change, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK, ISBN 978-0521700801, 2007.
Stiller-Reeve, M. A., Heuzé, C., Ball, W. T., White, R. H., Messori, G., van der Wiel, K., Medhaug, I., Eckes, A. H., O'Callaghan, A., Newland, M. J., Williams, S. R., Kasoar, M., Wittmeier, H. E., and Kumer, V.: Improving together: better science writing through peer learning, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2965–2973, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2965-2016, 2016.
Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S., Boschung, J.,
Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. (Eds.): Climate change 2013:
The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge, UK and New
York, USA, 2013.
Stoknes, P. E.: What we think about when we try not to think about global
warming: Toward a new psychology of climate action, Chelsea Green
Publishing, Vermont, USA, ISBN 978-1-60358-583-5, 2015.
Theel, S., Greenberg, M., and Robbins, D.: Study: media sowed doubt in
coverage of UN climate report, Media Matters for America, available at:
https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2013/10/10/study-media-sowed-doubt-in-coverage-of-un-clima/196387 (last access: 18 January 2019),
2013.
Townshend, T., Fankhauser, S., Aybar, R., Collins, M., Landesman, T.,
Nachmany, M., and Pavese, C.: How national legislation can help to solve
climate change, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 430–432, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1894,
2013.
Townson, S.: Why people fall for pseudoscience (and how academics can fight
back), The Guardian, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2016/jan/26/why-people-fall-for-pseudoscience-and-how-academics-can-fight-back (last access: 16 January 2019),
2016.
Trench, B.: Science communication and citizen science: How dead is the
deficit model?, Scientific Culture and Global Citizenship, Ninth
International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology
(PCST-9), 17–19 May 2006, Seoul, Korea, 2006.
Ungar, S.: The rise and (relative) decline of global warming as a social
problem, Sociol. Quart., 33, 483–501, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1992.tb00139.x,
2016.
Vraga, E., Myers, T., Kotcher, J., Beall, L., and Maibach, E.: Scientific
risk communication about controversial issues influences public perceptions
of scientists' political orientations and credibility, Roy. Soc. Open Sci.,
5, 170505, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170505, 2018.
Witte, K.: Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel
process model, Commun. Monogr., 59, 329–349, https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276,
1992.
Wooden, R.: The principles of public engagement: at the nexus of science,
public policy influence, and citizen education, Soc. Res., 73, 1057–1063,
2006.
Zhang, B., Mildenberger, M., Howe, P. D., Marlon, J., Rosenthal, S. A., and
Leiserowitz, A.: Quota sampling using Facebook advertisements, Political
Science Research and Methods, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.49, 2018.
Zürn, M.: The politicization of world politics and its effects: Eight
propositions, Eur. Polit. Sci. Rev., 6, 47–71,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773912000276, 2014.
