Geoscience Communication
Geoscience Communication
GC
Articles | Volume 7, issue 4
Articles | Volume 7, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 7, issue 4
Editorial
 | 
12 Nov 2024
Editorial |  | 12 Nov 2024

Editorial: The shadowlands of (geo)science communication in academia – definitions, problems, and possible solutions

Shahzad Gani, Louise Arnal, Lucy Beattie, John Hillier, Sam Illingworth, Tiziana Lanza, Solmaz Mohadjer, Karoliina Pulkkinen, Heidi Roop, Iain Stewart, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, and Stephanie Zihms

Viewed

Total article views: 6,533 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
5,156 1,226 151 6,533 180 273
  • HTML: 5,156
  • PDF: 1,226
  • XML: 151
  • Total: 6,533
  • BibTeX: 180
  • EndNote: 273
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jan 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jan 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 6,533 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 6,502 with geography defined and 31 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 20 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Science communication in geosciences has societal and scientific value but often operates in “shadowlands”. This editorial highlights these issues and proposes potential solutions. Our objective is to create a transparent and responsible geoscience communication landscape, fostering scientific progress, the well-being of scientists, and societal benefits.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint