Beckert, J.: Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics, Harvard University Press, 358 pp., ISBN 978-0-674-54587-8, 2016.
Bengtsson, M. and Kock, S.: “Coopetition” in business networks – to cooperate and compete simultane- ously, Ind. Market. Manag., 29, 411–427, 2000.
Bengtsson, M. and Raza-Ullah, T.: Paradox at an Inter-Firm Level: A Coopetition Lens, in: The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox, edited by: Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W., Jarzabkowski, P., and Langley, A., Oxford University Press, 296–314, ISBN 978-0-19-875442-8, 2017.
Bevacqua, E., De Michele, C., Manning, C., Couasnon, A., Ribeiro, A. F. S., Ramos, A. M., Vignotto, E., Bastos, A., Blesic, S., Durante, F., Hillier, J. K., Oliveira, S. C., Pinto, J. G., Ragno, E., Rivoire, P., Saunders, K., van der Wiel, K., Wu, W., Zhang, T., and Zscheischler, J.: Guidelines for Studying Diverse Types of Compound Weather and Climate Events, Earth's Future, 9, e2021EF002340, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002340, 2021.
BIS: Guidelines for managing projects: How to organise, plan and control projects, Department for Business Innovation and Skills, URN 10/1257,
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/31979/10-1257-guidelines-for-managing-projects.pdf (last access: 7 April 2022), 2010.
Bou Nassar, J. A., Malard, J. J., Adamowski, J. F., Ramírez Ramírez, M., Medema, W., and Tuy, H.: Multi-level storylines for participatory modeling – involving marginalized communities in Tz'olöj Ya', Mayan Guatemala, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1283–1306, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1283-2021, 2021.
Bourne, L. and Weaver, P.: Mapping Stakeholders, in: Construction Stakeholder Management, Wiley-Blackwell, 99–120, edited by: Chinyio, E. and Olomolaiye, P., ISBN 978-1-4051-8098-6, 2009.
Carmine, S. and Marchi, V. D.: Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective, J. Bus. Ethics, 184, 139–158, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05112-2, 2023.
Cook, G. A. S., Pandit, N. R., Beaverstock, J. V., Taylor, P. J., and Pain, K.: The role of location in knowledge creation and diffusion: evidence of centripetal and centrifugal forces in the City of London financial services agglomeration, Environ. Plan. A, 39, 1325–1345, 2007.
Cordner, A.: Strategic Science Translation and Environmental Controversies, Sci. Technol. Hum. Val., 40, 915–938, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915584164, 2015.
Cremen, G., Galasso, C., and McCloskey, J.: Modelling and quantifying tomorrow's risks from natural hazards, Sci. Total Environ., 817, 152552, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152552, 2022.
De Luca, P., Hillier, J. K., Wilby, R. L., Quinn, N. W., and Harrigan, S.: Extreme multi-basin flooding linked with extra-tropical cyclones, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 114009, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10100577, 2017.
Denscombe, M.: The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects, 4th edn., Open University Press, 392 pp., ISBN 978-0-335-24138-5, 2010.
D'Este, P. and Patel, P.: University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors determining the variety of interactions with industry?, Res. Policy, 36, 1295–1313, 2007.
D'Este, P. and Perkmann, M.: Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations, J. Technol. Transfer, 36, 316–339, 2011.
Dixon, R., Souch, C., and Whitaker, D.: European windstorm: Needs of the insurance industry, 21–23 June 2017, Reading, UK,
http://www.stormworkshops.org/workshop2017.html (last access: 20 November 2023), 2017.
Dowling, D. A.: The Dowling Review of Business-University Research Collaborations, 85 pp., BIS/15/352, UK government,
https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/the-dowling-review-of-business-university-research (last access: 26 January 2024), 2015.
Evans, D.: Academics do want to engage with business, but need more support, The Conversation, https://theconversation.com/academics-do-want-to-engage-with-business-but-need-more-support-62902 (last access: 26 January 2024), 2016.
Evans, J.: Lost in translation? Exploring the interface between local environmental research and policymaking, Environ. Plan. A, 38, 517–531, https://doi.org/10.1068/a37393, 2006.
Fahy, L. A.: Fostering regulator–innovator collaboration at the frontline: A case study of the UK's regulatory sandbox for fintech, Law and Policy, 44, 162–184, https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12184, 2022.
FloodRe: Flood Research Needs of the (Re)insurance sector, Lighthill Risk Network,
http://lighthillrisknetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Flood-Research-Needs-of-the-Re-in-surance-sector.pdf (last access: 26 January 2024), 2019.
FT: Lloyd's of London warns insurers climate-related pain is still to come, Financial Times, 22 October 2023.
Gilad, S.: How Firms Translate Regulatory Messages, London School of Economics, London School of economics, Discussion paper no. 70,
https://www.lse.ac.uk/accounting/assets/CARR/documents/D-P/Disspaper70.pdf (last access: 26 January 2024), 2012.
Glier, H. L., Gregory, E., Staples, T., Martinez, M., Fabos, A., Mitchell, S. E. D., and Downs, T. J.: Understanding stakeholder positionalities and relationships to reimagine asylum at the US–Mexico border: Observations from McAllen, TX, Human Geogr., 14, 96–109, https://doi.org/10.1177/1942778620979317, 2021.
Gnyawali, D. R. and He, J.: Co-opetition: Promises and challenges, in: 21st century management: A reference handbook, edited by: Wankel, C., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 386–398, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412954006, 2008.
Grabher, G.: Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks?: Communality, Sociality, and Connectivity in Project Ecologies, European Urban and Reg. Stud., 11, 103–123, 2004.
Gregg, J. S., Nyborg, S., Hansen, M., Schwanitz, V. J., Wierling, A., Zeiss, J. P., Delvaux, S., Saenz, V., Polo-Alvarez, L., Candelise, C., Gilcrease, W., Arrobbio, O., Sciullo, A., and Padovan, D.: Collective Action and Social Innovation in the Energy Sector: A Mobilization Model Perspective, Energies, 13, 651, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13030651, 2020.
Gulati, R.: Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis, Admin. Sci. Quart., 40, 619–652, 1995.
Hadzilicos, G., Li, R., Harrington, P., Latchman, S., Hillier, J. K., Dixon, R., New, C., Alabaster, A., and Tsapko, T.: It's windy when it's wet: why UK insurers may need to reassess their modelling assumptions, Bank Underground, https://bankunderground.co.uk/2021/04/08/its-windy-when-its-wet-why-uk-insurers-may-need-to-reassess-their-modelling-assumptions/ (last access: 12 October 2021), 2021.
Hess, M.: “Spatial” relationships? Towards a Reconceptualization of Embeddedness, Human Geogr., 28, 165–186, 2004.
Hillier, J. K. and Dixon, R.: Seasonal impact-based mapping of compound hazards, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 114013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbc3d, 2020.
Hillier, J. K., Macdonald, N., Leckebusch, G. C., and Stavrinides, A.: Interactions between apparently primary weather-driven hazards and their cost, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 104003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/104003, 2015.
Hillier, J. K., Foote, M., Tsanakas, A., Wardman, J., Mitchell-Wallace, K., Hughes, R., Dixon, R., Simeononva, B., and Brown, C.: Investing in science for natural hazards insurance, Figshare [data set], https://doi.org/10.17028/rd.lboro.c.4322666, 2019a.
Hillier, J. K., Saville, G. R., Smith, M. J., Scott, A. J., Raven, E. K., Gascoigne, J., Slater, L. J., Quinn, N., Tsanakas, A., Souch, C., Leckebusch, G. C., Macdonald, N., Milner, A. M., Loxton, J., Wilebore, R., Collins, A., MacKechnie, C., Tweddle, J., Moller, S., Dove, M., Langford, H., and Craig, J.: Demystifying academics to enhance university–business collaborations in environmental science, Geosci. Commun., 2, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-1-2019, 2019b.
Hutchinson, D.: Scaffolding Project Management Best Practices through Experiential Learning in a Large Enrolment Online Course, Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 11, 1–8, 2018.
Kim, J. and Parkhe, A.: Competing and cooperating similarity in global strategic alliances: An exploratory examination, Brit. J. Manage., 20, 363–376, 2009.
Kolb, D. A.: Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, 2nd edn., Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, ISBN 9780133892505, 2015.
Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H., Heikkinen, A., and Laude, D.: Stakeholder Engagement: Past, Present, and Future, Business & Society, 61, 1136–1196, 2022.
Lam, A.: What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: “Gold”, “ribbon” or “puzzle”?, Policy Res., 40, 1354–1368, 2011.
Lanzig, J.: Concept Mapping: Tools for Echoing the Minds Eye, Journal of Visual Literacy, 18, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.1998.11674524, 1998.
Lewis, M. W.: Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide, Acad. Manage. Rev., 25, 760–776, 2000.
Lörinc, M., Hotovy, O., and Podlaha, A.: Weather, Climate and Catastrophe Insight, Aon (Impact Forecasting),
https://www.aon.com/getmedia/f34ec133-3175-406c-9e0b-25cea768c5cf/20230125-weather-climate-catastrophe-insight.pdf (9 November 2023), 2023.
Margalida, A., Kuiken, T., and Green, R. E.: Improving the Translation from Science to Environmental Policy Decisions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 2600–2600, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00145, 2015.
Mendelow, A. L.: Environmental Scanning – The Impact of the Stakeholder Concept, ICIS 1981 Proceedings, 20, 407–418, 1981.
Miller, T., Baird, T., Littlefield, C., Kofinas, G., and Redman, C.: Epistemological Pluralism: Reorganizing Interdisciplinary Research, Ecol. Soc., 13, 46,
https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art46/, 2008.
Mitchell-Wallace, K., Jones, M., Hillier, J. K., and Foote, M.: Natural Catastrophe Risk Management and Modelling: A Practitioner's Guide, Wiley, Oxford, UK, 506 pp., ISBN 978-1-118-90604-0, 2017.
Mowrey, D. C. and Nelson, R. R. (Eds.): Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University-industry technology before and after the Bayh-Doyle Act, Stanford University Press, Stanford, ISBN 9780804795296, 2004.
Norström, A. V., Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M. F., West, S., Wyborn, C., and Balvanera, P.: Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research, Nat. Sustain., 3, 182–190, 2020.
Nooteboom, B.: Inter-firm Collaboration, Learning and Networks, Routledge, 240 pp., ISBN 978-0-415-32954-5, 2004.
Ostrom, E.: A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change, World Bank, Washington, DC,
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9034, 2010.
Perkmann, M. and Walsh, K.: University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda, Int. J. Manag. Rev., 9, 259–280, 2007.
Phillipson, J., Lowe, P., Proctor, A., and Ruto, E.: Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research, J. Environ. Manage., 95, 56–65, 2012.
PRA: A framework for assessing financial impacts of physical climate change: A practitioner's aide for the general insurance sector, Bank of England, https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation/publication/2019/a-framework-for-assessing-financial-impacts-of-physical-climate-change (last access: 6 April 2020), 2019.
Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Robinson, G. M., and Evely, A. C.: Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management, J. Environ. Manage., 91, 1766–1777, 2010.
Reed, M.: Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review, Biol. Conserv., 141, 2417–2431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014, 2008.
Reed, M. S.: The research impact handbook, 2nd edn., ISBN 978-0-9935482-4-6, 2018.
Ritala, P.: Coopetition strategy – When is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance, Brit. J. Manage., 23, 307–324, 2012.
Romance, N. R. and Vitale, M. R.: Concept Mapping as a Tool for Learning: Broadening the Framework for Student-Centered Instruction, College Teaching, 47, 74–79, https://doi.org/10.1080/87567559909595789, 2010.
Scott, A., Carter, C., Hardman, M., Grayson, N., and Slayney, T.: Mainstreaming ecosystem science in spatial planning practice
: Exploiting a hybrid opportunity space, Land Use Policy, 70, 232–246, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.002, 2018.
Simpson, N. P., Mach, K. J., Constable, A., Hess, J., Hogarth, R., Howden, M., Lawrence, J., Lempert, R. J., Muccione, V., Mackey, B., New, M. G., O'Neill, B., Otto, F., Portner, H.-O., Reisinger, A., Roberts, D., Schmidt, D. N., Seneviratne, S., Strongin, S., van Aalst, M., Totin, E., and Trisos, C. H.: A framework for complex climate change risk assessment, One Earth, 4, 489–501, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.03.005, 2021.
Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W., Jarzabkowski, P., and Langley, A. (Eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox, Oxford University Press, 622 pp., https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198754428.001.0001, ISBN 978-0-19-875442-8, 2017.
Stadtler, L. and Van Wassenhove, L. N.: Coopetition as a Paradox: Integrative Approaches in a Multi-Company, Cross-Sector Partnership, Organization Studies, 37, 655–685, https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615622066, 2016.
Taylor, Z. J. and Weinkle, J.: The riskscapes of re/insurance, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 13, 405–422, https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaa015, 2020.
Timms, P., Hillier, J. K., and Holland, C. P.: Increase data sharing or die? An initial view for natural catastrophe insurance, Geography, 107, 26–37, https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2022.2019494, 2022.
UKRI: 2022–23 to 2024–25 budget allocation for UK Research and Innovation, UK Research and Innovation, UKRI,
https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/UKRI-Budget-Allocations-2022-25_FINAL2.pdf (last access: 26 January 2024), 2022.
UNEP: Insuring the climate transition: Enhancing the insurance industry's assessment of climate change futures, UN Environment Programme, ISBN 978-92-807-3822-3, 2021.
Van Meeteren, M.: Learning by Bumping: Pathways of Dutch Smes to Foreign Direct Investment in Asia: Pathways of Dutch Smes to Foreign Direct Investment in Asia, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 106, 471–485, https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12121, 2014.
Van Meeteren, M. and Bassens, D.: Financial geography has come of age: making space for intradisciplinary dialogue, Finance and Space, 1, https://doi.org/10.1080/2833115X.2023.2258046, 2024.
Walker, D. H. T., Bourne, L. M., and Shelly, A.: Influence, stakeholder mapping and visualization, Construction Management and Economics, 26, 645–658, https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701882390, 2008.
Ward, V., House, A., and Hamer, S.: Developing a framework for transferring of knowledge into action: a thematic analysis of the literature, J. Health Serv. Res. Policy, 14, 156–164, 2009.
Weinkle, J. L.: Experts, regulatory capture, and the “governor's dilemma”: The politics of hurricane risk science and insurance, Regulation & Governance, 14, 637–652, 2020.
Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 336 pp., https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932, ISBN 978-0-521-66363-2, 1998.
Williams, T. G., Brown, D. G., Guikema, S. D., Logan, T. M., Magliocca, M. R., Müller, B., and Steger, C. E.: Integrating Equity Considerations into Agent-Based Modeling: A Conceptual Framework and Practical Guidance, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 25, 1–26, https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4816, 2022.
WSP: Interacting Risks in Infrastructure and the built and natural environments, CCRA research series, Report number: 70051310,
https://www.ukclimaterisk.org/ccra-research/ (last access: 26 January 2024), 2020.
