I encourage the authors to prepare and submit a revised version of their manuscript including all the responses/comments to the issues raised by the reviewers. The presentation of their artwork will certainly benefit greatly from this review process.

Dear authors,
I appreciate the originality of your work and relevance of the geoscience engagement. Also, I acknowledge the revision of your manuscript following the comments of the reviewers.
However, before the paper can be accepted for publication in a scientific journal, there are some key issues still open.
I kindly ask you for further effort to improve the presentation of your work and the readability of your manuscript following the standard rules of a scientific paper.
Please, see the attached file.

I really enjoyed reading your revised paper. Great job!
There are some minor oversights to be fixed.
1) Each figure (including panels a, b, c, d) should be discussed in the text in the order in which they appear.
2) Check that all of the supplementary materials are mentioned in the text
3) Check the captions: missing description for Fig 2c and Fig. 7b
4) Fig 08. Reorder the panels as they are mentioned in the text

Thank you for this fascinating piece of work, and for engaging so thoroughly with the peer review process. Once you have made the technical corrections that have been outlined by your editor, we will be delighted to publish your work in Geoscience Communication.

Many Thanks,

Sam