Thank you for your submission of this paper and for your active engagement with the reviewer comments through the interactive discussion. This paper on a network analysis of the AGU Fall Meeting is well written and structured, and presents some interesting results with high standards of clarity. After consideration by the reviewers, we would like to recommend that your paper be published subject to minor revisions. I am happy with your responses to the suggested changes in the interactive discussion and as such anticipate receiving your revised document as detailed in your response to the reviewer comments.

As per the reviewers comments it is expected that you will focus on a slight change of title to better reflect the debate around scientometrics and its place within this paper, amend the citation style of the open source data and software to be aligned with current standards, check the data and add requested detail to table two and clarify and amend the design of figure four, with some additional clarification in the text at your discretion.

Thank you very much for your detailed response to the reviewer comments in this final version of the manuscript. I am very satisfied with the changes you have made and am happy to recommend it for publication.