Thank you for submitting your paper to Geoscience Communication and for your engagement with the open review process. This paper is very interesting and presents a simple question to be examined that has great scope for future work in this area.

After reviewing the comments from both the reviewers and the commenters, and your responses I am happy to propose to publish this paper subject to minor corrections. These corrections are those that you have suggested in the response to the reviewers' comments, with some small additions.

Firstly in your response to the comments of reviewer 1 in the methods addition P3L7 (on page 3) perhaps also reference the need to include geological features as one of your central criteria.

Secondly in the sentence added after P6L9 (on page 3) you need to check and clarify as I think there is an error as the numbers stated here are the same.

Thirdly in the response to reviewer 2's comment (P3 on page 8) it is suggested that you add a more detailed explanation and citation in the text to justify your choice of using the likert scale in this test.

With these changes then I think this paper will be very well suited for publication.

Thank you for your full engagement with the review process. I am happy to recommend this paper for publication.

Thank you to the authors, reviewers, and Editor for a constructive dialogue around this manuscript. Congratulations to all on contributing to an excellent piece of work. I look forward to seeing it published and how it is received by the wider community.