Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-91-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-91-2024
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
18 Apr 2024
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 18 Apr 2024

Evaluating the impact of climate communication activities by scientists: what is known and necessary?

Frances Wijnen, Madelijn Strick, Mark Bos, and Erik van Sebille

Related authors

Flow patterns, hotspots and connectivity of land-derived substances at the sea surface of Curaçao in the Southern Caribbean
Vesna Bertoncelj, Furu Mienis, Paolo Stocchi, and Erik van Sebille
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3112,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3112, 2024
Short summary
The (non)effect of personalization in climate texts on the credibility of climate scientists: a case study on sustainable travel
Anna Leerink, Mark Bos, Daan Reijnders, and Erik van Sebille
Geosci. Commun., 7, 201–214, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-201-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-201-2024, 2024
Short summary
Possible provenance of IRD by tracing late Eocene Antarctic iceberg melting using a high-resolution ocean model
Mark Vinz Elbertsen, Erik van Sebille, and Peter Kristian Bijl
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1596,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1596, 2024
Short summary
Designing and evaluating a public engagement activity about sea level rise
Nieske Vergunst, Tugce Varol, and Erik van Sebille
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1649,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1649, 2024
Short summary
Non-negligible impact of Stokes drift and wave-driven Eulerian currents on simulated surface particle dispersal in the Mediterranean Sea
Siren Rühs, Ton van den Bremer, Emanuela Clementi, Michael C. Denes, Aimie Moulin, and Erik van Sebille
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1002,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1002, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Geoscience engagement | Keyword: Science engagement and dialogue
Earth science for all? The economic barrier to European geoscience conferences
Francyne Bochi do Amarante and Mauricio Barcelos Haag
Geosci. Commun., 7, 245–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-245-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-245-2024, 2024
Short summary
The future of conferences: lessons from Europe's largest online geoscience conference
Hazel Gibson, Sam Illingworth, and Susanne Buiter
Geosci. Commun., 4, 437–451, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-437-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-437-2021, 2021
Short summary
Demonstrating change from a drop-in space soundscape exhibit by using graffiti walls both before and after
Martin O. Archer, Natt Day, and Sarah Barnes
Geosci. Commun., 4, 57–67, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-57-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-57-2021, 2021
Short summary
The human side of geoscientists: comparing geoscientists' and non-geoscientists' cognitive and affective responses to geology
Anthea Lacchia, Geertje Schuitema, and Fergus McAuliffe
Geosci. Commun., 3, 291–302, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-291-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-291-2020, 2020
Short summary
In my remembered country: what poetry tells us about the changing perceptions of volcanoes between the nineteenth and twenty-first centuries
Arianna Soldati and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 3, 73–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-73-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-73-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior, Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec., 50, 179–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T, 1991. 
Ajzen, I.: Nature and operation of attitudes, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 52, 27–58, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27, 2001. 
Baram-Tsabari, A. and Lewenstein, B. V.: Preparing Scientists to Be Science Communicators, in: Preparing Informal Science Educators: Perspectives from Science Communication and Education, edited by: Patrick, P. G., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 437–471, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50398-1_22, 2017. 
Boon, W., de Haan, J., Duisterwinkel, C., Gould, L., Janssen, W., Jongsma, K., Milota, M., Radstake, M., Stevens, S., Strick, M., Swinkels, M., van Mil, M., van Sebille, E., Wanders, N., and Yerkes, M.: Meaningful public engagement in the context of open science: reflections from early and mid-career academics, Res. All, 6, 23, https://doi.org/10.14324/RFA.06.1.23, 2022. 
Bucchi, M.: Of deficits, deviations and dialogues – Theories of public communication of science, in: Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, edited by: Bucchi, M. and Trench, B., Routledge, London, 57–76, ISBN 9780203928240, 2008. 
Download
Executive editor
Engaging a broad public in climate sciences is crucial for educating and motivating action. In turn, assessing communication initiatives can contribute to improving these activities for all involved. Through a systematic literature review, the authors emphasise the scarcity of peer-reviewed publications evaluating the outcomes of scientists' science communication efforts. The paper underscores the need to transparently assess these activities, whether successful or not, in order to advance the field. Although the focus of this paper is on public engagement in climate science, the implications extend to various geoscience domains.
Short summary
Climate scientists are urged to communicate climate science; there is very little evidence about what types of communication work well for which audiences. We have performed a systematic literature review to analyze what is known about the efficacy of climate communication by scientists. While we have found more than 60 articles in the last 10 years about climate communication activities by scientists, only 7 of these included some form of evaluation of the impact of the activity.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint