Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-91-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-91-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| Highlight paper
| 
18 Apr 2024
Research article | Highlight paper |
| 18 Apr 2024
| 18 Apr 2024
Evaluating the impact of climate communication activities by scientists: what is known and necessary?
Frances Wijnen
Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584 CC, the Netherlands
Madelijn Strick
Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584 CC, the Netherlands
Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584 CC, the Netherlands
Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584 CC, the Netherlands
Related authors
No articles found.
Nieske Vergunst, Tugce Varol, and Erik van Sebille
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1649, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1649, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed and evaluated a board game about sea level rise to engage young adults. We found that the game positively influenced participants' perceptions of their impact on sea level rise, regardless of their prior familiarity with science. This study suggests that interactive and relatable activities can effectively engage broader audiences on climate issues, highlighting the potential for similar approaches in public science communication.
Siren Rühs, Ton van den Bremer, Emanuela Clementi, Michael C. Denes, Aimie Moulin, and Erik van Sebille
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1002, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1002, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Simulating the transport of floating particles on the ocean surface is crucial for solving many societal issues. Here, we investigate how the representation of wind-generated surface waves impacts particle transport simulations. We find that different wave-driven processes can alter the transport patterns, and that commonly adopted approximations are not always adequate. This implies that ideally coupled ocean-wave models should be used for surface particle transport simulations.
Anna Leerink, Mark Bos, Daan Reijnders, and Erik van Sebille
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-543, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-543, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate scientists who communicate to a broad audience may be reluctant to write in a more personal style, because they assume that it hurts their credibility. To test this assumption, we asked 100 Dutch people to rate the credibility of a climate scientist. We varied how the author of the article addressed the reader, and found that the degree of personalisation did not have a measurable impact on the credibility of the author. So we conclude that personalisation may not hurt credibility.
Philippe F. V. W. Frankemölle, Peter D. Nooteboom, Joe Scutt Phillips, Lauriane Escalle, Simon Nicol, and Erik van Sebille
Ocean Sci., 20, 31–41, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-31-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-31-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Tuna fisheries in the Pacific often use drifting fish aggregating devices (dFADs) to attract fish that are advected by subsurface flow through underwater appendages. Using a particle advection model, we find that virtual particles advected by surface flow are displaced farther than virtual dFADs. We find a relation between El Niño–Southern Oscillation and circular motion in some areas, influencing dFAD densities. This information helps us to understand processes that drive dFAD distribution.
Tor Nordam, Ruben Kristiansen, Raymond Nepstad, Erik van Sebille, and Andy M. Booth
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5339–5363, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5339-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5339-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We describe and compare two common methods, Eulerian and Lagrangian models, used to simulate the vertical transport of material in the ocean. They both solve the same transport problems but use different approaches for representing the underlying equations on the computer. The main focus of our study is on the numerical accuracy of the two approaches. Our results should be useful for other researchers creating or using these types of transport models.
Stefanie L. Ypma, Quinten Bohte, Alexander Forryan, Alberto C. Naveira Garabato, Andy Donnelly, and Erik van Sebille
Ocean Sci., 18, 1477–1490, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1477-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1477-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this research we aim to improve cleanup efforts on the Galapagos Islands of marine plastic debris when resources are limited and the distribution of the plastic on shorelines is unknown. Using a network that describes the flow of macroplastic between the islands we have identified the most efficient cleanup locations, quantified the impact of targeting these locations and showed that shorelines where the plastic is unlikely to leave are likely efficient cleanup locations.
Reint Fischer, Delphine Lobelle, Merel Kooi, Albert Koelmans, Victor Onink, Charlotte Laufkötter, Linda Amaral-Zettler, Andrew Yool, and Erik van Sebille
Biogeosciences, 19, 2211–2234, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2211-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2211-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Since current estimates show that only about 1 % of the all plastic that enters the ocean is floating at the surface, we look at subsurface processes that can cause vertical movement of (micro)plastic. We investigate how modelled algal attachment and the ocean's vertical movement can cause particles to sink and oscillate in the open ocean. Particles can sink to depths of > 5000 m in regions with high wind intensity and mainly remain close to the surface with low winds and biological activity.
Victor Onink, Erik van Sebille, and Charlotte Laufkötter
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1995–2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1995-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1995-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Turbulent mixing is a vital process in 3D modeling of particle transport in the ocean. However, since turbulence occurs on very short spatial scales and timescales, large-scale ocean models generally have highly simplified turbulence representations. We have developed parametrizations for the vertical turbulent transport of buoyant particles that can be easily applied in a large-scale particle tracking model. The predicted vertical concentration profiles match microplastic observations well.
Mikael L. A. Kaandorp, Stefanie L. Ypma, Marijke Boonstra, Henk A. Dijkstra, and Erik van Sebille
Ocean Sci., 18, 269–293, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-269-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-269-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A large amount of marine litter, such as plastics, is located on or around beaches. Both the total amount of this litter and its transport are poorly understood. We investigate this by training a machine learning model with data of cleanup efforts on Dutch beaches between 2014 and 2019, obtained by about 14 000 volunteers. We find that Dutch beaches contain up to 30 000 kg of litter, largely depending on tides, oceanic transport, and how exposed the beaches are.
Peter D. Nooteboom, Peter K. Bijl, Christian Kehl, Erik van Sebille, Martin Ziegler, Anna S. von der Heydt, and Henk A. Dijkstra
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 357–371, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-357-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-357-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Having descended through the water column, microplankton in ocean sediments represents the ocean surface environment and is used as an archive of past and present surface oceanographic conditions. However, this microplankton is advected by turbulent ocean currents during its sinking journey. We use simulations of sinking particles to define ocean bottom provinces and detect these provinces in datasets of sedimentary microplankton, which has implications for palaeoclimate reconstructions.
C. Kehl, R. P. B. Fischer, and E. van Sebille
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-4-2021, 217–224, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2021-217-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2021-217-2021, 2021
Rebeca de la Fuente, Gábor Drótos, Emilio Hernández-García, Cristóbal López, and Erik van Sebille
Ocean Sci., 17, 431–453, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-431-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-431-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Plastic pollution is a major environmental issue affecting the oceans. The number of floating and sedimented pieces has been quantified by several studies. But their abundance in the water column remains mostly unknown. To fill this gap we model the dynamics of a particular type of particle, rigid microplastics sinking rapidly in open sea in the Mediterranean. We find they represent a small but appreciable fraction of the total sea plastic and discuss characteristics of their sinking motion.
David Wichmann, Christian Kehl, Henk A. Dijkstra, and Erik van Sebille
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 28, 43–59, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-43-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-28-43-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Fluid parcels transported in complicated flows often contain subsets of particles that stay close over finite time intervals. We propose a new method for detecting finite-time coherent sets based on the density-based clustering technique of ordering points to identify the clustering structure (OPTICS). Unlike previous methods, our method has an intrinsic notion of coherent sets at different spatial scales. OPTICS is readily implemented in the SciPy sklearn package, making it easy to use.
Chris S. M. Turney, Richard T. Jones, Nicholas P. McKay, Erik van Sebille, Zoë A. Thomas, Claus-Dieter Hillenbrand, and Christopher J. Fogwill
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 3341–3356, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3341-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3341-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Last Interglacial (129–116 ka) experienced global temperatures and sea levels higher than today. The direct contribution of warmer conditions to global sea level (thermosteric) are uncertain. We report a global network of sea surface temperatures. We find mean global annual temperature anomalies of 0.2 ± 0.1˚C and an early maximum peak of 0.9 ± 0.1˚C. Our reconstruction suggests warmer waters contributed on average 0.08 ± 0.1 m and a peak contribution of 0.39 ± 0.1 m to global sea level.
Linda K. Dämmer, Lennart de Nooijer, Erik van Sebille, Jan G. Haak, and Gert-Jan Reichart
Clim. Past, 16, 2401–2414, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2401-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2401-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The compositions of foraminifera shells often vary with environmental parameters such as temperature or salinity; thus, they can be used as proxies for these environmental variables. Often a single proxy is influenced by more than one parameter. Here, we show that while salinity impacts shell Na / Ca, temperature has no effect. We also show that the combination of different proxies (Mg / Ca and δ18O) to reconstruct salinity does not seem to work as previously thought.
David Wichmann, Christian Kehl, Henk A. Dijkstra, and Erik van Sebille
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 27, 501–518, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-501-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-27-501-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The surface transport of heat, nutrients and plastic in the North Atlantic Ocean is organized into large-scale flow structures. We propose a new and simple method to detect such features in ocean drifter data sets by identifying groups of trajectories with similar dynamical behaviour using network theory. We successfully detect well-known regions such as the Subpolar and Subtropical gyres, the Western Boundary Current region and the Caribbean Sea.
Mirjam van der Mheen, Erik van Sebille, and Charitha Pattiaratchi
Ocean Sci., 16, 1317–1336, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-1317-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-1317-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A large percentage of global ocean plastic enters the Indian Ocean through rivers, but the fate of these plastics is generally unknown. In this paper, we use computer simulations to show that floating plastics
beachand end up on coastlines throughout the Indian Ocean. Coastlines where a lot of plastic enters the ocean are heavily affected by beaching plastic, but plastics can also beach far from the source on remote islands and countries that contribute little plastic pollution of their own.
Erik van Sebille, Philippe Delandmeter, John Schofield, Britta Denise Hardesty, Jen Jones, and Andy Donnelly
Ocean Sci., 15, 1341–1349, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1341-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1341-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The Galápagos Archipelago and Galápagos Marine Reserve are among the world's most iconic wildlife refuges. Yet, plastic litter is now found even in this remote archipelago. It is unclear where this plastic originates from. In this study, we show that remote coastal sources of plastic pollution are fairly localized and limited to South American and Central American coastlines. Identifying how plastic ends up in the Galápagos aids integrated management opportunities to reduce plastic pollution.
Philippe Delandmeter and Erik van Sebille
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3571–3584, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3571-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3571-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Parcels is a framework to compute how ocean currents transport
stuffsuch as plankton and plastic around. In the latest version 2.0 of Parcels, we focus on more accurate interpolation schemes and implement methods to seamlessly combine data from different sources (such as winds and currents, possibly in different regions). We show that this framework is very efficient for tracking how microplastic is transported through the North Sea into the Arctic.
Fabrice Ardhuin, Yevgueny Aksenov, Alvise Benetazzo, Laurent Bertino, Peter Brandt, Eric Caubet, Bertrand Chapron, Fabrice Collard, Sophie Cravatte, Jean-Marc Delouis, Frederic Dias, Gérald Dibarboure, Lucile Gaultier, Johnny Johannessen, Anton Korosov, Georgy Manucharyan, Dimitris Menemenlis, Melisa Menendez, Goulven Monnier, Alexis Mouche, Frédéric Nouguier, George Nurser, Pierre Rampal, Ad Reniers, Ernesto Rodriguez, Justin Stopa, Céline Tison, Clément Ubelmann, Erik van Sebille, and Jiping Xie
Ocean Sci., 14, 337–354, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-337-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-337-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The Sea surface KInematics Multiscale (SKIM) monitoring mission is a proposal for a future satellite that is designed to measure ocean currents and waves. Using a Doppler radar, the accurate measurement of currents requires the removal of the mean velocity due to ocean wave motions. This paper describes the main processing steps needed to produce currents and wave data from the radar measurements. With this technique, SKIM can provide unprecedented coverage and resolution, over the global ocean.
Michael Lange and Erik van Sebille
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4175–4186, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4175-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4175-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Here, we present version 0.9 of Parcels (Probably A Really Computationally Efficient Lagrangian Simulator). Parcels is an experimental prototype code aimed at exploring novel approaches for Lagrangian tracking of virtual ocean particles in the petascale age. The modularity, flexibility and scalability will allow the code to be used to track water, nutrients, microbes, plankton, plastic and even fish.
Chris S. M. Turney, Christopher J. Fogwill, Jonathan G. Palmer, Erik van Sebille, Zoë Thomas, Matt McGlone, Sarah Richardson, Janet M. Wilmshurst, Pavla Fenwick, Violette Zunz, Hugues Goosse, Kerry-Jayne Wilson, Lionel Carter, Mathew Lipson, Richard T. Jones, Melanie Harsch, Graeme Clark, Ezequiel Marzinelli, Tracey Rogers, Eleanor Rainsley, Laura Ciasto, Stephanie Waterman, Elizabeth R. Thomas, and Martin Visbeck
Clim. Past, 13, 231–248, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-231-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-231-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The Southern Ocean plays a fundamental role in global climate but suffers from a dearth of observational data. As the Australasian Antarctic Expedition 2013–2014 we have developed the first annually resolved temperature record using trees from subantarctic southwest Pacific (52–54˚S) to extend the climate record back to 1870. With modelling we show today's high climate variability became established in the ~1940s and likely driven by a Rossby wave response originating from the tropical Pacific.
Christopher J. Fogwill, Erik van Sebille, Eva A. Cougnon, Chris S. M. Turney, Steve R. Rintoul, Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi, Graeme F. Clark, E. M. Marzinelli, Eleanor B. Rainsley, and Lionel Carter
The Cryosphere, 10, 2603–2609, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2603-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2603-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Here we report new data from in situ oceanographic surveys and high-resolution ocean modelling experiments in the Commonwealth Bay region of East Antarctica, where in 2010 there was a major reconfiguration of the regional icescape due to the collision of the 97 km long iceberg B09B with the Mertz Glacier tongue. Here we compare post-calving observations with high-resolution ocean modelling which suggest that this reconfiguration has led to the development of a new polynya off Commonwealth Bay.
Paulina Cetina-Heredia, Erik van Sebille, Richard Matear, and Moninya Roughan
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2016-53, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2016-53, 2016
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Characterizing phytoplankton growth influences fisheries and climate. We use a lagrangian approach to identify phytoplankton blooms in the Great Australian Bight (GAB), and associate them with nitrate sources. We find that 88 % of the nitrate utilized in blooms is originated between the GAB and the SubAntarctic Front. Large nitrate concentrations are supplied at depth but do not reach the euphotic zone often. As a result, 55 % of blooms utilize nitrate supplied in the top 100 m.
Related subject area
Subject: Geoscience engagement | Keyword: Science engagement and dialogue
The future of conferences: lessons from Europe's largest online geoscience conference
Demonstrating change from a drop-in space soundscape exhibit by using graffiti walls both before and after
The human side of geoscientists: comparing geoscientists' and non-geoscientists' cognitive and affective responses to geology
In my remembered country: what poetry tells us about the changing perceptions of volcanoes between the nineteenth and twenty-first centuries
“This bookmark gauges the depths of the human”: how poetry can help to personalise climate change
Flash Flood!: a SeriousGeoGames activity combining science festivals, video games, and virtual reality with research data for communicating flood risk and geomorphology
An innovative STEM outreach model (OH-Kids) to foster the next generation of geoscientists, engineers, and technologists
Education and public engagement using an active research project: lessons and recipes from the SEA-SEIS North Atlantic Expedition's programme for Irish schools
Taking a Breath of the Wild: are geoscientists more effective than non-geoscientists in determining whether video game world landscapes are realistic?
Hazel Gibson, Sam Illingworth, and Susanne Buiter
Geosci. Commun., 4, 437–451, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-437-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-437-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In the spring of 2020, in response to the escalating global COVID-19 Coronavirus pandemic, the European Geosciences Union (EGU) moved its annual General Assembly online in a matter of weeks. This paper explores the feedback provided by participants who attended this experimental conference and identifies four key themes that emerged from analysis of the survey (connection, engagement, environment, and accessibility). The responses raise important questions about the format of future conferences.
Martin O. Archer, Natt Day, and Sarah Barnes
Geosci. Commun., 4, 57–67, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-57-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-57-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We show that integrating evaluation tools both before and after a drop-in engagement activity enables the demonstration of change and, thus, short-term impact. In our case, young families who listened to space sounds exhibited changed language and conceptions about space in their graffiti wall responses afterwards, exemplifying the power of sound in science communication. We suggest that evaluation tools be adopted both before and after drop-in activities in general.
Anthea Lacchia, Geertje Schuitema, and Fergus McAuliffe
Geosci. Commun., 3, 291–302, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-291-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-291-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Geoscientists can struggle to communicate with non-geoscientists, especially around contentious geoscience issues. We compare the thoughts and feelings of geoscientists and non-geoscientists around the subsurface, mining/quarrying, drilling and flooding. We find that geoscientists focus more on human interactions when thinking about these processes, while non-geoscientists focus more on economic and environmental impacts. Understanding these differences and similarities can help enable dialogue.
Arianna Soldati and Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 3, 73–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-73-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-73-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we investigate what poetry written about volcanoes from the 1800s to the present day reveals about the relationship between humanity and volcanoes, including how it evolved over that time frame. This analysis reveals that the human–volcano relationship is especially centred around the sense of identity that volcanoes provide to humans, which may follow from both positive and negative events, and has a spiritual element to it.
Sam Illingworth
Geosci. Commun., 3, 35–47, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-35-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-35-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
To many non-specialists, the science behind climate change can appear confusing and alienating, yet in order for global mitigation efforts to be successful it is not just scientists who need to take action, but rather society as a whole. This study shows how poets and poetry offer a method of communicating the science of climate change to the wider society
using language that they not only better understand, but which also has the potential to stimulate accountability and inspire action.
Chris Skinner
Geosci. Commun., 3, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-1-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-1-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study demonstrates how the popular mediums of video games, virtual reality, and science festivals can be combined with research data to produce useful tools for engaging the public with geosciences. Using the Flash Flood! simulation, it is demonstrated that the approach produces positive engagements and increases curiosity about flood risk and geomorphology; this is hoped to "plant the seeds" for fruitful engagements in the future with relevant agencies.
Adrián Pedrozo-Acuña, Roberto J. Favero Jr., Alejandra Amaro-Loza, Roberta K. Mocva-Kurek, Juan A. Sánchez-Peralta, Jorge A. Magos-Hernández, and Jorge Blanco-Figueroa
Geosci. Commun., 2, 187–199, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-187-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-187-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Inspiring young people to take part in the discovery and delivery of science is of paramount importance not only for their well-being but also for their future human development. To address this need, an outreach model entitled OH-Kids was designed to empower pupils through the development of high-quality STEM learning experiences based on a research project. The model enhances students attitude towards science.
Sergei Lebedev, Raffaele Bonadio, Clara Gómez-García, Janneke I. de Laat, Laura Bérdi, Bruna Chagas de Melo, Daniel Farrell, David Stalling, Céline Tirel, Louise Collins, Sadhbh McCarthy, Brendan O'Donoghue, Arne Schwenk, Mick Smyth, Christopher J. Bean, and the SEA-SEIS Team
Geosci. Commun., 2, 143–155, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-143-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-143-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Research projects with exciting field components present unique public engagement opportunities. In this case study, we draw lessons and recipes from our educational programme with schools, coupled with a research project and aimed at showing students how science works. Co-creation with scientists gets the students enthusiastically engaged. The outcomes include students getting more interested in science and science careers and researchers getting experience in education and public engagement.
Rolf Hut, Casper Albers, Sam Illingworth, and Chris Skinner
Geosci. Commun., 2, 117–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-117-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2-117-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Game worlds in modern computer games, while they include very Earth-like landscapes, are ultimately fake. Since games can be used for learning, we wondered if people pick up wrong information from games. Using a survey we tested if people with a background in geoscience are better than people without such a background at distinguishing if game landscapes are realistic. We found that geoscientists are significantly better at this, but the difference is small and overall everyone is good at it.
Cited articles
Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior, Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec., 50, 179–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T, 1991.
Ajzen, I.: Nature and operation of attitudes, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 52, 27–58, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27, 2001.
Baram-Tsabari, A. and Lewenstein, B. V.: Preparing Scientists to Be Science Communicators, in: Preparing Informal Science Educators: Perspectives from Science Communication and Education, edited by: Patrick, P. G., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 437–471, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50398-1_22, 2017.
Boon, W., de Haan, J., Duisterwinkel, C., Gould, L., Janssen, W., Jongsma, K., Milota, M., Radstake, M., Stevens, S., Strick, M., Swinkels, M., van Mil, M., van Sebille, E., Wanders, N., and Yerkes, M.: Meaningful public engagement in the context of open science: reflections from early and mid-career academics, Res. All, 6, 23, https://doi.org/10.14324/RFA.06.1.23, 2022.
Bucchi, M.: Of deficits, deviations and dialogues – Theories of public communication of science, in: Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, edited by: Bucchi, M. and Trench, B., Routledge, London, 57–76, ISBN 9780203928240, 2008.
Burke, M., Ockwell, D., and Whitmarsh, L.: Participatory arts and affective engagement with climate change: The missing link in achieving climate compatible behaviour change?, Global Environ. Chang., 49, 95–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.007, 2018.
Calyx, C. and Low, J.: How a climate change sceptic politician changed their mind, J. Sci. Commun., 19, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.22323/2.19030304, 2020.
Cologna, V., Knutti, R., Oreskes, N., and Siegrist, M.: Majority of German citizens, US citizens and climate scientists support policy advocacy by climate researchers and expect greater political engagement, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd4ac, 2021.
Corner, A. and Clarke, J.: Talking climate: From research to practice in public engagement, Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46744-3, 2017.
Corner, A., Shaw, C., and Clarke, J.: Principles for effective communication and public engagement on climate change: a handbook for IPCC authors, Climate Outreach, Oxford, https://climateoutreach.org/content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2018/01/Climate-Outreach-IPCC-communications-handbook.pdf (last access: 12 February 2024), 2018.
Dechezleprêtre, A., Fabre, A., Kruse, T., Planterose, B., Chico, A. S., and Stantcheva, S.: Fighting Climate Change: International Attitudes Toward Climate Policies (no. w30265), National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, https://doi.org/10.3386/w30265, 2022.
Douglas, H.: Science, policy and the value-free ideal, University of Pittsburgh Press, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wrc78, 2009.
Dziminska, M., Mendoza-Poudereux, I., Pellegrine, G., and Rowland, J.: Climate change and public perception. Citizens' proposals for better communication and involvement, J. Sci. Commun., 20, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20030209, 2021.
Elliott, K. and Resnik, D.: Science, policy, and the transparency of values, Environ. Health Persp., 122, 647–650, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408107, 2014.
Grand, A. and Sardo, M.: What works in the field? Evaluating informal science events, Front. Commun., 2, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2017.00022, 2017.
Geiger, N., Swim, J., Fraser, J., and Flinner, K.: Catalyzing public engagement with climate change through informal science learning centers, Sci. Commun., 39, 221–249, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017697980, 2017.
Hassol, S. J.: Improving how scientists communicate about climate change, Eos T. Am. Geophys. Un., 89, 106–107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008EO110002, 2008.
Hillier, J. K. and van Meeteren, M.: Co-RISK: a tool to co-create impactful university–industry projects for natural hazard risk mitigation, Geosci. Commun., 7, 35–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-35-2024, 2024.
Hillier, J. K., Welsh, K. E., Stiller-Reeve, M., Priestley, R. K., Roop, H. A., Lanza, T., and Illingworth, S.: Editorial: Geoscience communication – planning to make it publishable, Geosci. Commun., 4, 493–506, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-493-2021, 2021.
Illingworth, S. and Jack, K.: Rhyme and reason-using poetry to talk to underserved audiences about environmental change, Clim. Risk Manag., 19, 120–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2018.01.001, 2018.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P. R., Pirani, A., Moufouma-Okia, W., Péan, C., Pidcock, R., Connors, S., Matthews, J. B. R., Chen, Y., Zhou, X., Gomis, M. I., Lonnoy, E., Maycock, T., Tignor, M., and Waterfield, T., Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940, 2018.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D. C., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E. S., Mintenbeck, K., Alegría, A., Craig, M., Langsdorf, S., Löschke, S., Möller, V., Okem, A., Rama, B., Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844, 2022.
Jacobson, S., Seavey, J., and Mueller, R.: Integrated science and art education for creative climate change communication, Ecol. Soc., 21, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08626-210330, 2016.
Jensen, E.: Highlighting the value of impact evaluation: enhancing informal science learning and public engagement theory and practice, J. Sci. Commun., 14, 1–14, 2015.
Kluczkovski, A., Cook, J., Downie, H. F., Fletcher, A., McLoughlin, L., Markwick, A., Bridle, S. L., Reynolds, C. J., Schmidt Rivera, X., Martindale, W., Frankowska, A., Moraes, M. M., Birkett, A. J., Summerton, S., Green, R., Fennell, J. T., Snith, P., Ingram, J., Langley, I., Yates, L., and Ajagun-Brauns, J.: Interacting with members of the public to discuss the impact of food choices on climate change-experiences from two UK public engagement events, Sustainability, 12, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062323, 2020.
Kotcher, J., Myers, T., Vraga, E., Stenhouse, H., and Maiback, E.: Does engagement in advocacy hurt the credibility of scientists? Results from a randomized national survey experiment, Environ. Commun., 11, 415–429, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1275736, 2017.
Kumpu, V.: What is public engagement and how does it help to address climate change? A review of climate communication research, Environ. Commun., 16, 304–316, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2055601, 2022.
Lackey, R.: Science, scientists, and policy advocacy, Conserv. Biol., 21, 12–17, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00639.x, 2007.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U., Seifert, C., Schwarz, N., and Cook, J.: Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing, Psychol. Sci. Publ. Int., 13, 106–131, 2012.
Lubchenco, J.: Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science, Science, 279, 491–497, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5350.491, 1998.
Lubchenco, J.: Delivering on science's social contract, Mich. J. Sustain., 5, 95–108, https://doi.org/10.3998/mjs.12333712.0005.106, 2017.
Luís, S., Lima, M., Roseta-Palma, C., Rodrigues, N., Sousa, L., Freitas, F., Alves, F., Lillebø, A., Parrod, C., Jolivet, V., Paramana, T., Alexandrakis, G., and Poulos, S.: Psychosocial drivers for change: Understanding and promoting stakeholder engagement in local adaptation to climate change in three European Mediterranean case studies, J. Environ. Manage., 223, 165–174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.020, 2018.
Metcalfe, J.: Comparing science communication theory with practice: An assessment and critique using Australian data, Public Underst. Sci., 28, 382–400, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518821022, 2019.
Meyer, M.: The Rise of the Knowledge Broker, Sci. Commun., 32, 118–127, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009359797, 2010.
Nelson, M. and Vucetich, J.: On advocacy by environmental scientists: What, whether, why, and how, Conserv. Biol., 23, 1090–1101, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01250.x, 2009.
Nielsen, L.: Science and advocacy are different – And we need to keep them that way, Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 6, 39–47, https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200152668689, 2001.
Oosterman, J.: Making climate action meaningful: Communication practices in the New Zealand climate movement, New Zealand Sociol., 31, 131–157, 2016.
Pathak, M., Roy, J., Patel, S., Some, S., Vyas, P., Das, N., and Shukla, P.: Communicating climate change findings from IPCC reports: insights from outreach events in India, Climatic Change, 168, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03224-8, 2021.
Peeters, W., Land-Zandstra, A., and Strick, M.: Een nieuwe aanpak voor het meten van impact in de wetenschapscommunicatie: theoretisch kader en praktische uitwerking [A new approach to measuring impact in science communication: A theoretical framework and practical elaboration], Tijdschr. Communwet., 50, 231–250, https://doi.org/10.5117/TCW2022.3.006.PEET, 2022.
Peltola, T., Kaljonen, M., and Kettunen, M.: Embodied public experiments on sustainable eating: demonstrating alternative proteins in Finnish schools, Sustainability: Sci., Pract. Policy, 16, 184–196, https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1789268, 2020.
Rozance, M. A., Krosby, M., Meadow, A. M., Snover, A., Ferguson, D. B., and Owen, G.: Building capacity for societally engaged climate science by transforming science training, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 125008, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc27a, 2020.
Schmidt, G.: What should climate scientists advocate for?, B. Atom. Sci., 71, 70–74, https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340214563677, 2015.
Schneider, R. O.: Climate change: an emergency management perspective, Disaster Prev. Manag., 20, 53–62, https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561111111081, 2011.
Seethaler, S., Evans, J., Gere, C., and Rajagopalan, R.: Science, values, and science communication: Competencies for pushing beyond the deficit model, Sci. Commun., 41, 378–388, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019847484, 2019.
Simis, M. J., Madden, H., Cacciatore, M. A., and Yeo, S. K.: The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?, Public Underst. Sci., 25, 400–414, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629749, 2016.
van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., and Maibach, E. W.: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change as a Gateway Belief: Experimental Evidence, PLoS ONE, 10, e0118489, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118489, 2015.
Van Swol, Ly., Prahl, A., and Kolb, M.: The effects of discussion of familiar or non-familiar information and opinions of anthropogenic climate change, Environ. Commun., 13, 1128–1142, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1610022, 2019.
Whitmarsh, L., O'Neill, S., and Lorenzoni, I.: Public engagement with climate change: what do we know, and where do we go from here?, J. Media Cult. Politics, 9, 7–25, https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.9.1.7_1, 2013.
Wilkinson, C. and Weitkamp, E.: Evidencing Impact: The Challenges of Mapping Impacts from Public Engagement and Communication [Blog], https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/
impactofsocialsciences/2016/06/17/evidencing-impact-the-
challenges-of-mapping-impacts-from-public-engagement-and-communication/ (last access: 12 February 2024), 2016.
Wynne, B.: Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science – Hitting the notes, but missing the music?, Community Genet., 9, 211–220, https://doi.org/10.1159/000092659, 2006.
Ziegler, R., Hedder, I., and Fischer, L.: Evaluation of science communication: Current practices, challenges, and future implications, Front. Commun., 6, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.669744, 2021.
Executive editor
Engaging a broad public in climate sciences is crucial for educating and motivating action. In turn, assessing communication initiatives can contribute to improving these activities for all involved. Through a systematic literature review, the authors emphasise the scarcity of peer-reviewed publications evaluating the outcomes of scientists' science communication efforts. The paper underscores the need to transparently assess these activities, whether successful or not, in order to advance the field. Although the focus of this paper is on public engagement in climate science, the implications extend to various geoscience domains.
Engaging a broad public in climate sciences is crucial for educating and motivating action. In...
Short summary
Climate scientists are urged to communicate climate science; there is very little evidence about what types of communication work well for which audiences. We have performed a systematic literature review to analyze what is known about the efficacy of climate communication by scientists. While we have found more than 60 articles in the last 10 years about climate communication activities by scientists, only 7 of these included some form of evaluation of the impact of the activity.
Climate scientists are urged to communicate climate science; there is very little evidence about...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint