Articles | Volume 7, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-201-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-201-2024
Research article
 | 
05 Sep 2024
Research article |  | 05 Sep 2024

The (non)effect of personalization in climate texts on the credibility of climate scientists: a case study on sustainable travel

Anna Leerink, Mark Bos, Daan Reijnders, and Erik van Sebille

Data sets

Data and analysis script for "The (non)effect of personalization in climate texts on credibility of climate scientists: A case study on sustainable travel" Erik van Sebille https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12579018

Model code and software

nmalkin/plot-likert nmalkin et al. https://github.com/nmalkin/plot-likert/

Download
Short summary
Climate scientists who communicate to a broad audience may be reluctant to write in a more personal style, as they assume that it hurts their credibility. To test this assumption, we asked 100 Dutch people to rate the credibility of a climate scientist. We varied how the author of the article addressed the reader and found that the degree of personalization did not have a measurable impact on the credibility of the author. Thus, we conclude that personalization may not hurt credibility.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint