Geoscience Communication
Geoscience Communication
GC
Articles | Volume 6, issue 3
Articles | Volume 6, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-97-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-97-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 6, issue 3
Research article
 | 
06 Sep 2023
Research article |  | 06 Sep 2023

Understanding representations of uncertainty, an eye-tracking study – Part 1: The effect of anchoring

Kelsey J. Mulder, Louis Williams, Matthew Lickiss, Alison Black, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Rachel McCloy, and Eugene McSorley

Viewed

Total article views: 4,151 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,141 1,761 249 4,151 282 345
  • HTML: 2,141
  • PDF: 1,761
  • XML: 249
  • Total: 4,151
  • BibTeX: 282
  • EndNote: 345
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Oct 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Oct 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,151 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,001 with geography defined and 150 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 17 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
It is vital that uncertainty in environmental forecasting is graphically presented to enable people to use and interpret it correctly. Using novel eye-tracking methods, we show that where people look and the decisions they make are both strongly influenced by construction of forecast representations common in presentations of environmental data. This suggests that forecasters should construct their presentations carefully so that they help people to extract important information more easily.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint