Articles | Volume 5, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-125-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-125-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geonews: timely geoscience educational YouTube videos about recent geologic events
Ning Wang
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Geosciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson,
75080, USA
Zachary Clowdus
Department of Geosciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson,
75080, USA
Alessandra Sealander
Department of Geosciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson,
75080, USA
Robert Stern
Department of Geosciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson,
75080, USA
Related subject area
Subject: Open geoscience | Keyword: Community engagement
V3Geo: a cloud-based repository for virtual 3D models in geoscience
Simon J. Buckley, John A. Howell, Nicole Naumann, Conor Lewis, Magda Chmielewska, Kari Ringdal, Joris Vanbiervliet, Bowei Tong, Oliver S. Mulelid-Tynes, Dylan Foster, Gail Maxwell, and Jessica Pugsley
Geosci. Commun., 5, 67–82, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-67-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-67-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Virtual 3D models are becoming fundamental to support field-based geoscience, with drones and image-based modelling providing rapid workflows for generating 3D datasets for mapping and education. Here, we present V3Geo, a cloud-based repository to facilitate 3D model searching, reuse, sharing and visualisation. We highlight the potential value of V3Geo for the geoscience community with examples of scenarios in publication and teaching where the repository is already being employed.
Cited articles
Akinbadewa, B. O. and Sofowora, O. A.: The effectiveness of multimedia
instructional learning packages in enhancing secondary school students'
attitudes toward Biology, IJonSE, 2, 119–133, 2020.
Allgaier, J.: Science and medicine on YouTube, Second international handbook of Internet research, edited by: Hunsinger, J., Allen, M. M., and Klastrup, L., Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 7–27, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_1-1, 2020
Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tabourazi, D., and Brunton-Smith, I.: Science
knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis, Publ. Underst. Sci., 17, 35–54,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070159, 2008.
Arthurs, L.: How explicit is the cognitive science foundation of geoscience
education research? A study of syntactical units in JGE articles, J.
Geosci. Educ., 66, 77–91, 2018.
Askanius, T. and Uldam, J.: Online social media for radical politics: climate
change activism on YouTube, Int. J. Electron. Govern., 4, 69–84,
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.041708, 2011.
Association of Internet Researchers: Ethical Decision-Making and Internet
Research, Version 2, http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf (last access: 30 April 2022),
2012.
Azer, S. A., Al Grain, H. A., Al Khelaif, R. A., and Al Eshaiwi, S. M.:
Evaluation of the educational value of YouTube videos about physical
examination of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems, J. Med. Internet Res., 15, e2728, https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2728, 2013.
Banchero, P., Rector, T. A., and Van Ballenberghe, J.: Best practices 30 in climate change communication as applied to an informal education documentary about Alaska, J. Geosci. Educ., 69, 138–149, 2021.
Barrett, B. F., Notaras, M., and Smith, C.: Communicating scientific
research through the Web and social media: experience of the United Nations
University with the Our World 2.0 web magazine, edited by: Tong, V. C. H., Geoscience Research and Outreach, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 91–101, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6943-4, 2014.
Bartel, B. and Bohon, W.: The Hazards of Hazard Communication: Importance, Rewards, and Challenges of Science in the Public Sphere: A white paper summary of presentations from session PA23B at the 2018 Fall Meeting of the 485 American Geophysical Union, 11 December 2018, Washington, D.C., UNAVCO and IRIS, Washington, D.C., https://www.unavco.org/about/organization/education-and-community-engagement, (last access: 30 April 2022), 2019.
Bartel, B. A., Bohon, W., Stovall, W. K., and Poland, M. P.: Communicating Geohazards: Delivering Information Responsibly in Crisis and Calm, in: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, American Geophysical Union, 11 December 2019, San Francisco, US, U33B-06, 2019AGUFM.U33B..06B, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AGUFM.U33B..06B/abstract (last access: 30 April 2022), 2019.
Barton, T., Beaven, S., Cradock-Henry, N., and Wilson, T.: Knowledge sharing
in interdisciplinary disaster risk management initiatives: cocreation
insights and experience from New Zealand, Ecol. Soc., 25, 25,
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11928-250425, 2020.
Beautemps, J. and Bresges, A.: What Comprises a Successful Educational Science YouTube Video? A Five-Thousand User Survey on Viewing Behaviors and Self-Perceived Importance of Various Variables Controlled by Content Creators. Front. Commun., 5, 600595, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.600595, 2021.
Bobek, E. and Tversky, B.: Creating visual explanations improves
learning, Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic., 1, 1–14, 2016.
Borghol, Y., Ardon, S., Carlsson, N., Eager, D., and Mahanti, A.: The untold story of
the clones: Contentagnostic factors that impact YouTube video popularity, 18th ACM SIGKDD conference, Beijing, China, 14 August 2012, ACM 978-1-4503-1462-6 /12/08,
http://www.ida.liu.se/~nikca/papers/kdd12.pdf (last access: 11 December 2021), 2012.
Boy, B., Bucher, H.-J., and Christ, K.: Audiovisual Science Communication
on TV and YouTube. How Recipients Understand and Evaluate Science Videos,
Frontiers in Communication, 5, 608620, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.608620, 2020
Carmichael, M., Reid, A.-K., and Karpicke, J. D.: Assessing the Impact of Educational Video on Student Engagement, Critical Thinking and Learning, A SAGE White Paper, SAGE Publishing, 4–18, https://gmc-hq.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Video-white-paper-2018_PRINT-READY.pdf (last access: 30 April 2022), 2018.
Chatzopoulou, G., Sheng, C., and Faloutsos, M.: A first step towards understanding popularity in YouTube, in: 2010 INFOCOM IEEE Conference on Computer CommunicationsWorkshops, IEEE Infocom Ser., San Diego, CA, US, 14–19 March 2010, 978-1-4244-6739-6/10, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM13546.2010, 2010.
Covington, P., Adams, J., and Sargin, E.: Deep neural networks for YouTube recommendations, in: Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems, Boston, MA, USA, 15–19 September 2016, 191–198, https://doi.org/10.1145/2959100.2959190, 2016.
Donhauser, D. and Beck, C.: Pushing the Max Planck YouTube Channel With the Help of Influencers, Front. Commun., 5, 601168, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.601168, 2021.
Drake, J. L., Kontar, Y. Y., and Rife, G. S. (Eds.): New trends in
earth-science outreach and engagement: the nature of communication, 38, Springer
Science and Business Media, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01821-8, 2013.
Dubovi, I. and Tabak, I.: An empirical analysis of knowledge
co-construction in YouTube comments, Comput. Educ., 156, 103939, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103939,
2020.
Dufty, N.: Engagement or education?, Aust. J. Emerg. Manag., 26, 35–39, 2011.
Dunn, L.: Using social media to enhance learning and teaching, in: Social Media 2013: 18th International Conference on Education and Technology, Hong Kong, China, 1–3 August 2013, http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/89363/ (last access: 11 December 2021), 2013.
Dyer, H.: I watched an entire Flat Earth Convention for my research –
here's what I learnt, The conversation,
http://theconversation.com/i-watched-an-entire-flat-earthconvention
(last access: 1 February 2021), 2018.
Falk, J. H. and Dierking, L. D.: School is not where most Americans learn
most of their science, Am. Sci., 98, 486, https://doi.org/10.1511/2010.87.486, 2010.
Fallou, L. and Bossu, R.: Taking into account the cultural context to
improve scientific communication–Lessons learned from earthquakes in
Mayotte, EGU Seismology, https://blogs.egu.eu/divisions/sm/2019/03/08/taking-into-account-the-cultural-context (last access: 1 May 2022), 2019.
Figueiredo, F., Almeida, J. M., Benevenuto, F., and Gummadi, K. P.: Does content determine information popularity in social media? A case study of YouTube videos’ content and their popularity, 32nd annual ACM conference, Toronto, ON, Canada, 28 April 2014, https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557285, 2014.
Forster, A. and Freeborough, K.: A guide to the communication of geohazards information to the public, Urban Geoscience and Geohazards Programme, British Geological Survey Internal Report, IR/06/009, 1-39, https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/7173/1/IR06009.pdf (last access: 1 May 2022), 2006.
Freberg, K., Saling, K., Vidoloff, K. G., and Eosco, G.: Using value
modeling to evaluate social media messages: The case of Hurricane
Irene, Public Relat. Rev., 39, 185–192, 2013.
Geipel, A.: Wissenschaft@YouTube, in: Knowledge in Action–Neue Formen
der Kommunikation in der Wissensgesellschaft, edited by: Lettkemann, E., Wilke, R., and
Knoblauch, H., Springer, Wiesbaden, 137–163, ISBN: 978-3-658-18336-3, 2018.
Global Volcanism Program: Volcanoes of the World, v. 4.10.5 (27 January 2022), edited by: Venzke, E., Smithsonian Institution, Downloaded 04 February 2022,
https://doi.org/10.5479/si.GVP.VOTW4-2013, 2013.
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A.,
Gustafson, A., and Leiserowitz, A.: The experience of consensus: Video as an
effective medium to communicate scientific agreement on climate
change, Sci. Commun., 41, 659–673, 2019.
Golder, S., Ahmed, S., Norman, G., and Booth, A.: Attitudes toward the
ethics of research using social media: a systematic review, J. Med. Internet. Res., 19, e7082, https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082,
2017.
Google: Google Maps directions to USA,
https://goo.gl/maps/, last access: 10 January 2018.
Greussing, E., Kessler, S. H., and Boomgaarden, H. G.: Learning From Science
News via Interactive and Animated Data Visualizations: An Investigation
Combining Eye Tracking, Online Survey, and Cued Retrospective
Reporting, Sci. Commun., 42, 803–828, 2020.
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., and Rubin, R.: How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos, in: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, 41–50, https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239, 2014.
Hicks, S. P.: Geoscience analysis on Twitter, Nat. Geosci., 12,
585–586, 2019.
Hussain, M. N., Tokdemir, S., Agarwal, N., and Al-Khateeb, S.: Analyzing disinformation and crowd manipulation tactics on YouTube, in: 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), Barcelona, Spain, 28–31 August 2018, 1092–1095, https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508766, 2018.
Idaho Geological Survey: https://www.idahogeology.org/WebMap/
(last access: 9 November 2021), 2020.
Ickert, J. and Stewart, I. S.: Earthquake risk communication as dialogue – insights from a workshop in Istanbul's urban renewal neighbourhoods, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1157–1173, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1157-2016, 2016.
Illingworth, S., Redfern, J., Millington, S., and Gray, S.: What’s in a Name? Exploring the Nomenclature of Science Communication in the UK, F1000Research 2015, 4, 409, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6858.2, 2015.
Illingworth, S.: Delivering effective science communication: Advice from a
professional science communicator, Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., 70, 10–16,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.04.002, 2017.
Illingworth, S., Stewart, I., Tennant, J., and von Elverfeldt, K.: Editorial: Geoscience Communication – Building bridges, not walls, Geosci. Commun., 1, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-1-2018, 2018.
Irwin, A. and Michael, M. (Eds.): Science, social theory and public knowledge, Open University Press, Maidenhead, England and Philadelphia, US, 5–29, ISBN: 0-335-20947-5, 2003.
Jones, L. M.: Empowering the public with earthquake science, Nat. Rev.
Earth Environ., 1, 2–3, 2020.
Kanamori, H.: The energy release in great earthquakes, J. Geophy. Res., 82, 2981–2987, 1977.
Kaul, L., Schrögel, P., and Humm, C.: Environmental Science Communication for a Young Audience: A Case Study on the #Earth-OvershootDay Campaign on YouTube, Front. Commun., 5, 601177, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.601177, 2020.
Kelly, B. and Ronan, K. R.: Preparedness for natural hazards: testing an
expanded education-and engagement-enhanced social cognitive model, Nat.
Hazards, 91, 19–35, 2018.
Kerlow, I., Pedreros, G., and Albert, H.: Earth Girl Volcano: characterizing and conveying volcanic hazard complexity in an interactive casual game of disaster preparedness and response, Geosci. Commun., 3, 343–364, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-343-2020, 2020.
Khan, F. G. and Vong, S.: Virality over YouTube: An empirical analysis,
Internet Res., 24, 629–647,
https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2013-0085, 2014.
King, C.: Geoscience education: an overview, Stud. Sci. Educ.,
44, 187–222, 2008.
Krauss, W., Schäfer, M. S., and von Storch, H.: Post-normal climate
science, Nat. Cult., 7, 121–132, 2012.
Lacassin, R., Devès, M., Hicks, S. P., Ampuero, J.-P., Bossu, R., Bruhat, L., Daryono, Wibisono, D. F., Fallou, L., Fielding, E. J., Gabriel, A.-A., Gurney, J., Krippner, J., Lomax, A., Sudibyo, Muh. M., Pamumpuni, A., Patton, J. R., Robinson, H., Tingay, M., and Valkaniotis, S.: Rapid collaborative knowledge building via Twitter after significant geohazard events, Geosci. Commun., 3, 129–146, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-129-2020, 2020.
Lacchia, A., Schuitema, G., and McAuliffe, F.: The human side of geoscientists: comparing geoscientists' and non-geoscientists' cognitive and affective responses to geology, Geosci. Commun., 3, 291–302, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-291-2020, 2020.
Landrum, A. R., Olshansky, A., and Richards, O.: Differential susceptibility
to misleading flat earth arguments on youtube, Media Psychol., 24, 136–165, 2021.
Legewie, N. and Nassauer, A.: YouTube, Google, Facebook: 21st century
online video research and research ethics, in: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19, 32, Freie Universität Berlin, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3130, 2018.
Littrell, M. K., Okochi, C., Gold, A. U., Leckey, E., Tayne, K., Lynds, S.,
Williams, V., and Wise, S.: Exploring students' engagement with place-based
environmental challenges through filmmaking: A case study from the Lens on
Climate Change program, J. Geosci. Educ., 68, 80–93,
https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1633510, 2020.
Lomax, A., Bossu, R., and Mazet-Roux, G.: Real-Time Science on Social Media: The Example of Twitter in the Minutes, Hours, Days after the 2015 M7.8 Nepal Earthquake, in: AGU Fall Meeting 2015 Abstracts, San Francisco, USA, 14–18 December 2015, S43D-2818, http://alomax.free.fr/posters/agu2015/RT_Science_AGU2015_Poster.pdf (last access: 1 May 2022), 2015.
Lundgren, R. E. and McMakin, A. H.: Principles of Risk Communication, in: Risk Communication: A Handbook for Communicating Environmental, Safety, and Health Risks, edited by: Lundgren, R. E. and McMakin, A. H, Wiley-IEEE Press, Hoboken, US, 71–82, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118645734.ch6, 2013.
Manduca, C. A. and Kastens, K. A.: Geoscience and geoscientists: Uniquely
equipped to study Earth, in: Earth and
Mind II: A Synthesis of Research on Thinking and Learning in the
Geosciences, edited by: Kastens, K. A. and Manduca, C. A., Geological Society of America, https://doi.org/10.1130/2012.2486(01), 2012.
Mayer, R. E.: Evidence-Based Principles for How to Design Effective
Instructional Videos, J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn.,
10, 229–240, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.03.007,
2021.
Maynard, A. D.: How to Succeed as an Academic on YouTube, Frontiers in
Communication, 5, 572181, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.572181, 2021.
Michael, M.: Publics performing publics: Of PiGs, PiPs and politics, Public Underst. Sci.,
18, 617–631, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508098581, 2009
Moloney, K. and Unger, M.: Transmedia storytelling in science communication: one subject, multiple media, unlimited stories, in: New Trends in Earth-Science Outreach and Engagement, Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 38), Springer, Cham, 109–120, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01821-8_8, 2014.
Moran, M., Seaman, J., and Tinti-Kane, H.: Teaching, Learning, and Sharing:
How Today's Higher Education Faculty Use Social Media, Babson
Survey Research Group, Wellesley, MA, 1–3, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535130.pdf (last access: 1 May 2022), 2011.
Mosher, S. and Keane, C. (Eds.): Vision and Change in the Geosciences: The Future of Undergraduate Geoscience Education, American Geosciences Institute publications, Alexandria, VA, US, 184, https://www.americangeosciences.org/change/pdfs/Vision-Change-Geosciences.pdf (last access: 1 May 2022), 2021.
Mosher, S., Bralower, T., Huntoon, J., Lea, P., McConnell, D., Miller, K., Ryan, J. G., Summa, L., Villalobos, J., and White, L.: Future of undergraduate geoscience education: Summary report for summit on future of undergraduate geoscience education, School of Geosciences Faculty and Staff Publications, 1127, 1–10, https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/geo_facpub/1127 (last access: 1 May 2022), 2014.
Mossoux, S., Delcamp, A., Poppe, S., Michellier, C., Canters, F., and Kervyn, M.: Hazagora: will you survive the next disaster? – A serious game to raise awareness about geohazards and disaster risk reduction, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 135–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-135-2016, 2016.
Nafees, L., Cook, C. M., Nikolov, A. N., and Stoddard, J. E.: Can social
media influencer (SMI) power influence consumer brand attitudes? The
mediating role of perceived SMI credibility, Digital Business, 1, 100008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100008, 2021.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, https://doi.org/10.17226/23674, 2017.
Nature Editorial: Time to discuss consent in digital-data studies, Nature,
572, 5, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02322-z, 2019.
NBC News:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/7-5-magnitude-earthquake-rocks-indonesia-usgs-says-n914681,
(last access: 9 November 2021), 2018.
Nisbet, M. C., Hixon, M. A., Moore, K. D., and Nelson, M.: Four cultures:
New synergies for engaging society on climate change, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8, 329–331, 2010.
Ozdede, M. and Peker, I.: Analysis of dentistry YouTube videos related to
COVID-19, Braz. Dent. J., 31, 392–398, 2020.
Papadopoulos, G. A.: Quantification of Tsunamis: The New 12-Point Tsunami Intensity Scale, in: Workshop on the Physics of Tsunami, Hazard Assessment Methods and Disaster Risk Management (Theories and Practices for Implementing Proactive Countermeasures), Athens, Greece, 14–18 May 2007, 573–575, https://indico.ictp.it/event/a06194/session/9/contribution/7/material/0/0.pdf (last access: 1 May 2022), 2007.
Pavelle, S., and Wilkinson, C.: Into the digital wild: utilizing Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook for effective science and environmental communication, Front. Commun., 5, 575122, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.575122, 2020.
Pew Research Center: Social Media Fact Sheet, Pew Research Center, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/?menuItem=d102dcb7-e8a1-42cd-a04e-ee442f81505a (last access: 1 January 2022), 2021.
Ploetzner, R., Berney, S., and Bétrancourt, M.: A review of learning
demands in instructional animations: The educational effectiveness of
animations unfolds if the features of change need to be learned, J.
Comput. Assist. Lear., 1, 1–23, 2020.
Rosenbaum, M. S. and Culshaw, M. G.: Communicating the risks arising from
geohazards, J. R. Stat. Soc. A Stat., 166, 261–270, 2003.
Schäfer, M. S.: Online communication on climate change and climate
politics: a literature review, WIRES Clim. Change, 3, 527–543, 2012.
Schmidt-McCormack, J. A., Muniz, M. N., Keuter, E. C., Shaw, S. K., and
Cole, R. S.: Design and implementation of instructional videos for
upper-division undergraduate laboratory courses, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 18, 749–762, 2017.
Semken, S., Ward, E. G., Moosavi, S., and Chinn, P. W. U.: Place-Based
Education in Geoscience: Theory, Research, Practice, and Assessment,
J. Geosci. Educ., 65, 542–562, https://doi.org/10.5408/17-276.1, 2017.
Shiffman, S. D.: The Benefits of Twitter for Scientists, American Scientist,
https://www.americanscientist.org/blog/macroscope/the-benefits-of-twitter-for-scientists (last access: 18 February
2021), 2017.
National Research Council: Discipline-Based Education Research – Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering, edited by: Singer, S. R., Nielsen, N. R., and Schweingruber, H. A., Committee on the Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington, DC, The National Academies Press, 1–93, https://doi.org/10.17226/13362, 2012.
Siersdorfer, S., Chelaru, S., Nejdl, W., and San Pedro, J.: How useful are your comments? Analyzing and predicting YouTube comments and comment ratings, in: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, Raleigh, North Carolina, US, 26–30 April 2010, 891–900, ACM 978-1-60558-799-8/10/04, 2010.
Smith, A. A.: Broadcasting ourselves: Opportunities for researchers to share their work through online video. Front. Environ. Sci. 8, 150, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00150, 2020.
Smith, A., Toor, S., and Van Kessel, P.: Many turn to YouTube for children's
content, news, how-to lessons, Pew Research Centre, 7, https://internet.psych.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/532-Master/532-UnitPages/Unit-02/Smith_Pew_2018.pdf (last access: 1 May 2022) 2018.
Statista: Percentage of U.S. internet users who use YouTube as of 3rd
quarter 2020, by age group, Statista,
https://www.statista.com/statistics/296227/us-youtube-reach-age-gender/
(last access: 1 January 2022), 2020.
Stern, R., Lieu, W., Mantey, A., Ward, A., Fechter, T., Farrar, E.,
McComber, S., and Windler, J.: A new animation of subduction zone processes
developed for the undergraduate and community college
audience, Geosphere, 13, 628–643, 2017.
Stern, R. J., Ryan, J., Wang, N., Ricchezza, V. J., and Willis, S.: Geoscience Videos and Animations: How to Make Them with Your Students, and How to Use Them in the Classroom, GSA Today, 30, 1–2, https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG451GW.1, 2020.
Stewart, I. S. and Lewis, D.: Communicating contested geoscience to the
public: Moving from “matters of fact” to “matters of concern”,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 174, 122–133, 2017.
Stewart, I. S. and Nield, T.: Earth stories: context and narrative in the
communication of popular geoscience, P. Geologist.
Assoc., 124, 699–712, 2013.
Stillings, N.: Complex systems in the geosciences and in geoscience
learning, Earth and mind II: A synthesis of research on thinking and
learning in the geosciences, Geol. S. Am. S.,
486, 97–111, 2012.
Stover, C. W. and Coffman, J. L.: Seismicity of the United States 1568–1989 (revised), US Government Printing Office, 3–5, https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1527,
1993.
Takahashi, B., Tandoc Jr., E. C., and Carmichael, C.: Communicating on
Twitter during a disaster: An analysis of tweets during Typhoon Haiyan in
the Philippines, Comput. Hum. Behav., 50, 392–398, 2015.
Talreja, J.: How To Identify If YouTube Video Views Are Real Or Fake?,
https://viewsfly.com/blog/how-to-identify-if-youtube-video-views-are-real-or-fake/
(last access: 5 February 2022), 2021.
Tayne, K., Littrell, M. K., Okochi, C., Gold, A. U., and Leckey, E.: Framing action in a youth climate change filmmaking program: Hope, agency, and action across scales, Environ. Educ. Res., 27, 706–726, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1821870, 2021.
Thomson, A., Bridgstock, R., and Willems, C.: “Teachers Flipping Out”
beyond the Online Lecture: Maximising the Educational Potential of
Video, J. Learn. Des., 7, 67–78, 2014.
Tong, V. C. (Ed.): Geoscience Research and Outreach – Schools and Public Engagement, Innovations in Science Education and Technology, 21, Springer Science and Business Media, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London, 10, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6943-4, 2013.
Townsend, L. and Wallace, C.: Social media research: A guide to
ethics, University of Aberdeen,1, 16, https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_487729_smxx.pdf (last access: 1 May 2022), 2016.
Tschantz, M. C., Egelman, S., Choi, J., Weaver, N., and Friedland, G.: The Accuracy of the Demographic Inferences Shown on Google’s Ad Settings, in: Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES '18), Toronto, ON, Canada, 15 October 2018, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 33–41, https://doi.org/10.1145/3267323.3268962, 2018.
Ulges, A., Borth, D., and Koch, M.: Content analysis meets viewers: linking
concept detection with demographics on youtube, Int. J. Multimed. Inf. Retr., 2, 145–157, 2013.
Urban, M. J. and Falvo, D. A. (Eds.): Advances in Early Childhood
and K-12 Education, in: Improving K-12 STEM Education Outcomes
through Technological Integration, IGI Global, 2–15, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9616-7, 2016.
U.S. Geological Survey: Earthquake Lists, Maps, and Statistics,
https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/lists-maps-and-statistics, last access: 18 March 2020.
Van Loon, A. F., Lester-Moseley, I., Rohse, M., Jones, P., and Day, R.: Creative practice as a tool to build resilience to natural hazards in the Global South, Geosci. Commun., 3, 453–474, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-453-2020, 2020.
Vega, V. and Robb, M. B.: The Common Sense census: Inside the 21st-century
classroom, Common Sense Media, San Francisco, CA, 5–55, https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/research/report/2019-educator-census-inside-the-21st-century-classroom_1.pdf (last access: 1 May 2022), 2019.
Veil, S. R., Buehner, T., and Palenchar, M. J.: A work-in-process literature
review: Incorporating social media in risk and crisis
communication, J. Conting. Crisis Man., 19, 110–122, 2011.
Velho, R. M. and Barata, G.: Profiles, Challenges, and Motivations of Science YouTubers, Frontiers in Communication, 5, 542936, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.542936, 2020.
Vitek J. D. and Berta S. M.: Improving perception of and response to natural
hazards: The need for local education, J. Geogr., 81, 225–228,
https://doi.org/10.1080/00221348208980740, 1982.
Wang, N.: 2018 and 2020 Geonews Video.xlsx, Figshare [data set], https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19687920.v3, 2022a.
Wang, N.: Comparison.xlsx, Figshare [data set], https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19687926.v2, 2022b.
Wang, N., Clowdus, Z., Sealander, A., and Stern, R.: GeonewsDataSet_2018_to_2020Geonews: Timely Geological Events Videos, Figshare [data set], https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19687911.v3, 2022a.
Wang, N., Stern, R. J., and Waite, L.: Workflow for Designing Place-Based
Geoscience Educational Videos for Geoscience Majors: The Permian Basin
Example, J. Geosci. Educ., in review, 2022b.
Welbourne, D. J. and Grant, W. J.:. Science communication on YouTube:
Factors that affect channel and video popularity, Public Underst.
Sci., 25, 706–718, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515572068, 2016.
Wiggen, J. and McDonnell, D.: Geoscience Videos and Their Role in Supporting Student Learning, J. Coll. Sci. Teach., 46, 44–49, ISSN: ISSN-0047-231X, 2017.
Wijnker, W., Bakker, A., van Gog, T., and Drijvers, P.: Educational videos
from a film theory perspective: Relating teacher aims to video
characteristics, Brit. J. Educ. Technol., 50,
3175–3197, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12725, 2019.
Willis, S., Stern, R. J., Ryan, J., and Bebeau, C.: Exploring Best Practices
in Geoscience Education: Adapting a Video/Animation on Continental Rifting
for Upper Division Students to a Lower Division Audience, Geosci. J., 11,
140, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11030140, 2021.
Wissenschaft im Dialog: Wissenschaftsbarometer 2018 – Ergebnisse nach Subgruppen, https://www.wissenschaft-im-dialog.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Projekte/Wissenschaftsbarometer/Dokumente_18/Downloads_allgemein/Tabellenband_Wissenschaftsbarometer2018_final.pdf
(last access: 24 June
2020), 2018.
Wood, H. O. and Neumann, F.: Modified Mercalli intensity scale of
1931, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 21, 277–283, 1931.
Woodfield, K. and Iphofen, R.: Introduction to Volume 2: The Ethics of Online Research, in: The Ethics of Online Research (Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity, Vol. 2), edited by: Woodfield, K., Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002013, 2017.
YouTube: Statistics, https://www.youtube.com/yt/about/press/,
last access: 1 March 2021.
Zavestoski, S., Shulman, S., and Schlosberg, D.: Democracy and the environment on the
internet: electronic citizen participation in regulatory rulemaking, Sci.
Technol. Human Values, 31, 383–408, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906287543, 2006.
Zhou, R., Khemmarat, S., and Gao, L.: The impact of YouTube recommendation system on video views, in: 10th ACM SIGCOMM conference, Melbourne, Australia, 1–3 November 2010, ACM 978-1-4503-0057-5/10/11, http://conferences.sigcomm.org/imc/2010/papers/p404.pdf (last access: 31 December 2021), 2010.
Zuckerberg, M., Bosworth, A., Cox, C., Sanghvi, R., and Cahill, M.:
Communicating a Newsfeed of Media Content Based on a Member's Interactions
in a Social Network Environment, Menlo Park, CA, United States Patent US 8,
171, 128 B2, https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/d9/48/40/eb3dd597f86e39/US8171128.pdf (last access: 1 May 2021), 2012.
Short summary
Natural events like earthquakes provide an opportunity for geoscientists to communicate Earth science with the public. YouTube has a large number of users, but little is known about how YouTube videos on natural events engage and communicate geoscience to the public. Our results show that timely videos about geologic events in the news better engage younger and more diverse audiences to be interested in Earth science and stimulates more meaningful dialogues with certain YouTube users.
Natural events like earthquakes provide an opportunity for geoscientists to communicate Earth...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint