Bossu, R., Mazet-Roux, G., Douet, V., Rives, S., Marin, S., and Aupetit, M.:
Internet users as seismic sensors for improved earthquake response, Eos,
Transactions American Geophysical Union, 89, 225–226, 2008. a
Bossu, R., Laurin, M., Mazet-Roux, G., Roussel, F., and Steed, R.: The
importance of smartphones as public earthquake-information tools and tools
for the rapid engagement with eyewitnesses: A case study of the 2015 Nepal
earthquake sequence, Seismol. Res. Lett., 86, 1587–1592, 2015. a
Bossu, R., Landès, M., Roussel, F., Steed, R., Mazet-Roux, G., Martin,
S. S., and Hough, S.: Thumbnail-based questionnaires for the rapid and
efficient collection of macroseismic data from global earthquakes,
Seismol. Res. Lett., 88, 72–81, 2017. a
British Geological Survey: BGS E-Mail Earthquake Questionnaire, available at:
http://www.earthquakes.bgs.ac.uk/questionnaire/EqQuestIntroA.html, last access: 10 June 2020. a
Cataldi, L., Tiberi, L., and Costa, G.: Estimation of MCS intensity for Italy from high quality accelerometric data, using GMICEs and Gaussian Naïve Bayes Classifiers, B. Earthq. Eng., in press, 2021.
a,
b
Crooks, A., Croitoru, A., Stefanidis, A., and Radzikowski, J.: Earthquake:
Twitter as a distributed sensor system, T. GIS, 17, 124–147, 2013. a
Department of Engineering of Dokuz Eylul University: 12 Haziran 2017
Izmir Karaburun (Ege Denizi) Depremi Değerlendirme Raporu, available at:
http://www.jeofizik.org.tr/resimler/ekler/74cb68517e1d6f3_ek.pdf?tipi=1&turu=H&sube=4 (last access: 17 February 2021), 2017 (in Turkish). a
Earle, P., Guy, M., Buckmaster, R., Ostrum, C., Horvath, S., and Vaughan, A.:
OMG earthquake! Can Twitter improve earthquake response?, Seismol. Res. Lett., 81, 246–251, 2010. a
Earle, P. S., Bowden, D. C., and Guy, M.: Twitter earthquake detection:
earthquake monitoring in a social world, Ann. Geophys., 54, 6,
https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-5364, 2012.
a
Ergin, M., Özalaybey, S., Aktar, M., and Yalcin, M.: Site amplification at Avcılar, Istanbul, Tectonophysics, 391, 335–346, 2004.
a,
b
Fayjaloun, R., Gehl, P., Auclair, S., Boulahya, F., Marthe, S. G., and Roulle, A.: Integrating strong-motion recordings and Twitter data for a rapid
shakemap of macroseismic intensity,
Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 52, 101927,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101927, 2020.
a
Goltz, J. D., Park, H., Quitoriano, V., and Wald, D. J.: Human Behavioral
Response in the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Earthquakes: Assessing Immediate
Actions Based on Data from “Did You Feel It?”,
B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 110, 1589–1602, 2020. a
Li, J. and Rao, H. R.: Twitter as a rapid response news service: An exploration
in the context of the 2008 China earthquake,
The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 42, 1–22, 2010. a
Liang, W.-T., Lee, J.-C., Chen, K. H., and Hsiao, N.-C.: Citizen earthquake
science in Taiwan: from science to hazard mitigation,
Journal of Disaster Research, 12, 1174–1181, 2017. a
Locati, M., Camassi, R. D., Rovida, A. N., Ercolani, E., Bernardini, F. M. A., Castelli, V., Caracciolo, C. H., Tertulliani, A., Rossi, A., Azzaro, R., D'Amico, S., Conte, S., and Rocchetti, E.: DBMI15, the 2015 version of the Italian Macroseismic Database, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia,
https://doi.org/10.6092/INGV.IT-DBMI15, 2016.
a
Mendoza, M., Poblete, B., and Castillo, C.: Twitter under crisis: Can we trust what we RT?, in: Proceedings of the first workshop on social media analytics, 25 July 2010, Washington, D.C., USA, 71–79, available at:
http://snap.stanford.edu/soma2010/ (last access: 22 February 2021), 2010. a
Miyabe, M., Miura, A., and Aramaki, E.: Use trend analysis of twitter after the great east japan earthquake, in: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion, 11–15 February 2012, Seattle, Washington, USA, 175–178, available at:
https://dl.acm.org/action/showFmPdf?doi=10.1145/2145204 (last access: 22 February 2021), 2012. a
Robinson, B., Power, R., and Cameron, M.: A sensitive twitter earthquake
detector, in: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on world wide
web, 13–17 May 2013, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 999–1002, available at:
https://dl.acm.org/action/showFmPdf?doi=10.1145/2487788 (last access: 22 February 2021), 2013. a
Sieberg, A.: Scala MCS (Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg), Geologie der Erdbeben,
Handbuch der Geophysik, 2, 552–555, 1930. a
Swiss Seismological Service: Did You Feel an Earthquake? Report an
Earthquake, available at:
http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/en/earthquakes/did-you-feel-an-earthquake/, last access: 10 June 2020. a
Tezcan, S. S., Kaya, E., Bal, I. E., and Özdemir, Z.: Seismic
amplification at Avcılar, Istanbul, Eng. Struct., 24, 661–667,
2002.
a,
b,
c
Turkish Statistical Institute: Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
Usage in Households and by Individuals, available at:
http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1028 (last access: 10 June 2020), 2019. a
Wald, D. J., Quitoriano, V., Worden, C. B., Hopper, M., and Dewey, J. W.: USGS “Did You Feel It?”, internet-based macroseismic intensity maps, Ann. Geophys., 54, 6,
https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-5354, 2012.
a
Zielinski, A., Bügel, U., Middleton, L., Middleton, S., Tokarchuk, L.,
Watson, K., and Chaves, F.: Multilingual analysis of twitter news in support
of mass emergency events., in: ISCRAM, Citeseer, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA, 77–85,
https://doi.org/10.4018/jiscrm.2013010105, 2012.
a
