Articles | Volume 3, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-291-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.The human side of geoscientists: comparing geoscientists' and non-geoscientists' cognitive and affective responses to geology
Related authors
Related subject area
Subject: Geoscience engagement | Keyword: Science engagement and dialogue
The future of conferences: lessons from Europe's largest online geoscience conference
Demonstrating change from a drop-in space soundscape exhibit by using graffiti walls both before and after
“This bookmark gauges the depths of the human”: how poetry can help to personalise climate change
Geosci. Commun., 4, 437–451,
2021Geosci. Commun., 4, 57–67,
2021Geosci. Commun., 3, 35–47,
2020Cited articles
Barthel, R. and Seidl, R.: Interdisciplinary Collaboration between Natural
and Social Sciences – Status and Trends Exemplified in Groundwater
Research, PLoS ONE, 12, e0170754, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170754, 2017.
Barthes, R.: Mythologies, Lowe and Brydone, Norfolk, 1974.
Bickerstaff, K., Simmons, P., and Pidgeon, N.: Public perceptions of risk, science and governance: main findings of a qualitative study of six risk cases, Technical Report 06-03, Centre for Environmental Risk, Norwich, 2006.
Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., and Read, D.: What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental Models, Risk Anal., 14, 959–970, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00065.x., 1994.
Boudet, H., Clarke, C., Bugden, D., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., and
Leiserowitz, A.: “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing, Energ. Policy, 65, 57–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017, 2014.