Articles | Volume 3, issue 1
Geosci. Commun., 3, 19–34, 2020
Geosci. Commun., 3, 19–34, 2020

Research article 05 Mar 2020

Research article | 05 Mar 2020

Assessing economic impacts of environmental research infrastructures: overview of methodological tools

Régis Kalaydjian

Cited articles

Barrow, C., Loveland, R., Terkla, D., Flanagan, T., and Proshina, A.: The marine science and technology industry in New England, Haldey, USA, University of Massachusetts, Donahue Institute, 24 pp., 2005. 
Carval, T., Coatanoan, C., and Cancouet, R.: Argo data management report 2018, Coriolis DAC & GDAC. Ifremer/IRSI/ISI-DTI/RAP-18-102, 41 pp.,, 2018. 
Cedre and Ifremer: INTERRISK. Estimation of avoided consequences of the crisis linked to the setup of project tools, D6-4, WP 600, Task 5, 14 pp., Brussels, 2009. 
ESFRI (European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures): Roadmap 2018, Strategy Report on Research Infrastructures, August 2018, Milano, Università degli Studi di Milano, 229 pp., 2018. 
Euro-Argo European Research Infrastructure Consortium: Strategy for evolution of Argo in Europe, EA-2016-ERIC-STRAT, Brest, France, Euro-Argo ERIC, 67 pp.,, 2017. 
Short summary
Environmental research infrastructures are key to monitoring the growth conditions of environmentally sensitive activities. Based on literature and a case study, the paper reviews the main methods used for assessing the performance of infrastructures via their economic impacts. A framework is proposed for analysing assessment methods per impact category and by area of relevance. Further progress requires more data on environment and sensitive activities to improve the efficiency of the methods.
Final-revised paper