Blok, A., Jensen, M., and Kaltoft, P.: Social identities and risk: expert
and lay imaginations on pesticide use, Public Underst. Sci., 17, 189–209,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070176, 2008.
Bowring, S. A.: Perceptions of Time Matter: The Importance of Geoscience
Outreach, in: Geoscience Research and Outreach. Innovations in Science
Education and Technology 21, edited by: Tong, V., Springer, Dordrecht, 11–15,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6943-4_2, 2014.
Boykoff, M. T.: Media and scientific communication: a case of climate
change, in: Communicating Environmental Geoscience, edited by: Liverman, D. G. E., Pereira, C. P., and
Marker, B., London, Geological Society,
Special Publications, 305, 11–18, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP305.3, 2008.
Bucchi, M. and Trench, B.: Science communication and science in society: A
conceptual review in ten keywords, Tecnoscienza, 7, 151–168,
2016.
Burns, T. W., O'Connor, D. J., and Stocklmayer, S. M.: Science communication: a contemporary definition, Public Underst. Sci., 12, 183–202, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662503012200, 2003.
Clarkson, M. D., Houghton, J., Chen, W., and Rohde, J.: Speaking about
science: a student-led training program improves graduate students' skills
in public communication, J. Sci. Commun., 17, A05, https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17020205, 2018.
Cook, G., Pieri, E., and Robbins, P. T.: “The scientists think and the
public feels”: Expert perceptions of the discourse of GM food, Discourse
Soc., 15, 433–449, https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504043708, 2004.
Corley, E. A., Kim, Y., and Scheufele, D. A.: Leading US nano-scientists'
perceptions about media coverage and the public communication of scientific
research findings, J. Nanopart Res., 13, 7041–7055, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0617-3, 2011.
Crettaz von Roten, F.: Gender differences in scientists' public outreach and
engagement activities, Sci. Commun., 33, 52–75, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010378658, 2011.
Davies, S. R.: Constructing communication: Talking to scientists about
talking to the public, Sci. Commun., 29, 413–434, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008316222, 2008.
Di Giulio, G. M., Pereira, N. M., and de Figueiredo, B. R.: Lead
contamination, the media and risk communication: a case study from the
Ribeira Valley, Brazil, in: Communicating Environmental Geoscience,
edited by: Liverman,
D. G. E., Pereira, C. P., and Marker, B., London, Geological Society, Special Publications, 305, 63–74, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP305.7, 2008.
Dudo, A., Kahlor, L., AbiGhannam, N., Lazard, A., and Liang, M. C.: An
analysis of nanoscientists as public communicators, Na.t Nanotechnol., 9,
841–844, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.194, 2014.
Dunwoody, S. and Ryan, M.: Scientific barriers to the popularization of
science in the mass media, J. Commun., 35, 26–42,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb01882.x, 1985.
Dunwoody, S., Brossard, D., and Dudo, A.: Socialization or rewards?
Predicting U.S. scientist-media interactions, J. Mass Commun. Q., 86,
299–314, https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600203, 2009.
Dohaney, J., Brogt, E., Kennedy, B., Wilson, T. M., and Lindsay, J.
M.: Training in crisis communication and volcanic eruption forecasting:
design and evaluation of an authentic role-play simulation, J. Appl.
Volcanol., 4, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-015-0030-1, 2015.
Ecklund, E. H., James, S. A., and Lincoln, A. E.: How Academic Biologists
and Physicists View Science Outreach, PLoS ONE, 7, e36240, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036240, 2012.
Entradas, M. and Bauer, M. M.: Mobilisation for public engagement:
benchmarking the practices of research institutes, Public Underst. Sci.,
26, 771–788, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516633834, 2017.
Entradas, M. and Bauer, M. W.: Bustling public communication by astronomers
around the world driven by personal and contextual factors, Nat. Astron.,
3, 183, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0633-7, 2019.
Entradas, M., Marcelino, J., Bauer, M. W., and Lewenstein, B.: Public
communication by climate scientists: what, with whom and why?, Clim.
Change, 154, 69–85, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02414-9, 2019.
Gascoigne, T. and Metcalfe, J.: Incentives and impediments to scientists
communicating through the media, Sci. Commun., 18, 265–282, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547097018003005, 1997.
Hartz, J. and Chappell, R., Worlds Apart: how the distance between science
and journalism threatens America's future, Analyzing Current Attitudes,
First Amendment Center, 178 pp.,
https://repo.library.stonybrook.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11401/8198/hartzchappell1997.pdf?sequence=1,
(last access: 18 June 2022), 1998.
Illingworth, S., Stewart, I., Tennant, J., and von Elverfeldt, K.: Editorial: Geoscience Communication – Building bridges, not walls, Geosci. Commun., 1, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-1-1-2018, 2018.
Ivanova, A., Schäfer, M. S., Schlichting, I., and Schmidt, A.: Is there
a medialization of climate science? Results from a survey of German climate
scientists, Sci. Commun., 35, 626–653, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012475226, 2013.
Jensen, P.: A statistical picture of popularization activities and their
evolutions in France, Public Underst. Sci., 20, 26–36, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510383632, 2011.
Jensen, P. and Croissant, Y.: CNRS researchers' popularization activities: a
progress report, J. Sci. Commun., 6, 14 pp., https://doi.org/10.22323/2.06030201,
2007.
Jensen, P., Rouquier, J. B., Kreimer, P., and Croissant, Y.: Scientists who
engage with society perform better academically, Sci. Public Policy, 35,
527–541, https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X329130, 2008.
Johnson, D. R., Ecklund, E. H., and Lincoln, A. E.: Narratives of science
outreach in elite contexts of academic science, Sci. Commun., 36, 81–105,
https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013499142, 2014.
Kreimer, P., Levin, L., and Jensen, P.: Popularization by argentine
researchers: the activities and motivations of CONICET scientists, Public
Underst. Sci., 20, 37–47, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510383924, 2011.
Kyvik, S.: Popular science publishing and contributions to public discourse
among university faculty, Sci. Commun., 26, 288–311, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547004273022, 2005.
Liverman, D.: Communicating Geological Hazards: Educating, Training and
Assisting Geoscientists in Communication Skills, in: Geophysical Hazards.
Minimizing Risk, Maximizing Awareness, edited by: Beer, T., Springer,
Dordrecht, 41–55, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3236-2_4, 2009.
Liverman, D. and Jaramillo, M.: Communicating Environmental Geoscience – An
International Survey, Episodes, 34, 25–31, https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2011/v34i1/004, 2011.
Marcinkowski, F., Kohring, M., Furst, S., and Friedrichsmeier, A.:
Organizational influence on scientists' efforts to go public: an empirical
investigation, Sci. Commun., 36, 56–80, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013494022, 2014.
Martinez-Conde, S.: Has contemporary academia outgrown the Carl Sagan
effect?, J. Neurosci., 36, 2077–2082, https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0086-16.2016, 2016.
Mathews, D. J., Kalfoglou, A., and Hudson, K.: Geneticists' views on science
policy formation and public outreach, Am. J. Med. Genet., 137A,
161–169, https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.30849, 2005.
McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A.: Generalized Linear Models, Monographs on
Statistics and Applied Probability, 2nd Edn., Chapman and Hall,
London, 37, ISBN 9780412317606, 1989.
Neresini, F. and Bucchi, M.: Which indicators for the new public engagement
activities? An exploratory study of European research institutions, Public
Underst. Sci., 20, 64–79, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510388363, 2011.
Nielsen, K., Kjaer, C. R., and Dahlgaard, J.: Scientists and science
communication: a Danish survey, J. Sci. Commun., 6, A01, https://doi.org/10.22323/2.06010201, 2007.
Pearson, G., Pringle, S. M., and Thomas, J. N.: Scientists and the public
understanding of science, Public Underst. Sci., 6, 279, https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/6/3/006, 1997.
Peters, H. P.: Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as
public communicators, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 110, 14102–14109, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212745110, 2013.
Peters, H. P., Brossard, D., de Cheveigné, S., Dunwoody, S., Kallfass,
M., Miller, S., and Tsuchida, S.: Science communication: interactions with
the mass media, Science, 321, 204–205, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157780, 2008.
Pinto, B. M., Costa, J. L., and Cabral, H. N.: How do science communication
practitioners view scientists and audiences in relation to public engagement
activities? A research note concerning the marine sciences in Portugal,
Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc., 37, 159–166, https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467618819683, 2018.
Poliakoff, E. and Webb, T. L.: What factors predict scientists' intentions
to participate in public engagement of science activities?, Sci. Commun.,
29, 242–263, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547007308009, 2007.
Ridgway, A., Milani, E., Weitkamp, E., and Wilkinson, C.: Report on the
Working Practices, Motivations and Challenges of those Engaged in Science
Communication. European Commission repository and Zenodo: European
Commission, 5
9 pp.,
https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/6017685 (last access: 18 June 2022), 2020.
Rose, K. M., Markowitz, E. M., and Brossard, D.: Scientists' incentives and
attitudes toward public communication, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117,
1274–1276, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916740117, 2020.
Royal Society: Survey of factors affecting science communication by
scientists and engineers excellence in science, London, Research Councils
UK, Wellcome Trust, 45 pp.,
https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2006/1111111395.pdf (last access: 18 June
2022), 2006.
Russo, G.: Outreach: Meet the press, Nature, 468, 465–467, https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7322-465a, 2010.
Shanley, P. and López, C.: Out of the loop: why research rarely reaches
policy makers and the public and what can be done, Biotropica, 41,
535–544, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00561.x, 2010.
Torres-Albero, C., Fernández-Esquinas, M., Rey-Rocha, J., and
Martín-Sempere, M. J.: Dissemination practices in the Spanish research
system: scientists trapped in a golden cage, Public Underst. Sci., 20,
12–25, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510382361, 2011.
Young, N. and Matthews, R.: Experts' understanding of the public: Knowledge
control in a risk controversy, Public Underst. Sci., 16, 123–144,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507060586, 2007.
Wellcome Trust: The Role of Scientists in Public Debate, London, Mori, 50 pp.,
https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/wtd003425_0.pdf
(last access: 18 June 2022), 2000.
