Articles | Volume 3, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-89-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-89-2020
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
21 Apr 2020
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 21 Apr 2020

The benefits to climate science of including early-career scientists as reviewers

Mathieu Casado, Gwenaëlle Gremion, Paul Rosenbaum, Jilda Alicia Caccavo, Kelsey Aho, Nicolas Champollion, Sarah L. Connors, Adrian Dahood, Alfonso Fernandez, Martine Lizotte, Katja Mintenbeck, Elvira Poloczanska, and Gerlis Fugmann

Related authors

Surface processes and drivers of the snow water stable isotopic composition at Dome C, East Antarctica – a multi-datasets and modelling analysis
Inès Ollivier, Hans Christian Steen-Larsen, Barbara Stenni, Laurent Arnaud, Mathieu Casado, Alexandre Cauquoin, Giuliano Dreossi, Christophe Genthon, Bénédicte Minster, Ghislain Picard, Martin Werner, and Amaëlle Landais
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-685,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-685, 2024
Short summary
Climate change is rapidly deteriorating the climatic signal in Svalbard glaciers
Andrea Spolaor, Federico Scoto, Catherine Larose, Elena Barbaro, Francois Burgay, Mats P. Bjorkman, David Cappelletti, Federico Dallo, Fabrizio de Blasi, Dmitry Divine, Giuliano Dreossi, Jacopo Gabrieli, Elisabeth Isaksson, Jack Kohler, Tonu Martma, Louise S. Schmidt, Thomas V. Schuler, Barbara Stenni, Clara Turetta, Bartłomiej Luks, Mathieu Casado, and Jean-Charles Gallet
The Cryosphere, 18, 307–320, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-307-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-307-2024, 2024
Short summary
From atmospheric water isotopes measurement to firn core interpretation in Adélie Land: a case study for isotope-enabled atmospheric models in Antarctica
Christophe Leroy-Dos Santos, Elise Fourré, Cécile Agosta, Mathieu Casado, Alexandre Cauquoin, Martin Werner, Benedicte Minster, Frédéric Prié, Olivier Jossoud, Leila Petit, and Amaëlle Landais
The Cryosphere, 17, 5241–5254, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5241-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5241-2023, 2023
Short summary
A decade (2008–2017) of water stable-isotope composition of precipitation at Concordia Station, East Antarctica
Giuliano Dreossi, Mauro Masiol, Barbara Stenni, Daniele Zannoni, Claudio Scarchilli, Virginia Ciardini, Mathieu Casado, Amaëlle Landais, Martin Werner, Alexandre Cauquoin, Giampietro Casasanta, Massimo Del Guasta, Vittoria Posocco, and Carlo Barbante
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2813,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2813, 2023
Short summary
New infrared spectroscopy instrument for reliable low humidity water vapour isotopic composition measurements
Mathieu Casado, Amaelle Landais, Tim Stoltmann, Justin Chaillot, Mathieu Daëron, Frédéric Prié, Baptiste Bordet, and Samir Kassi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2457,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2457, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, P., Gerlis, F., and Frigga, K.: Association of Polar Early Career Scientists Promotes Professional Skills, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 95, 204–204, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EO240004, 2014. 
Besançon, L., Rönnberg, N., Löwgren, J., Tennant, J. P., and Cooper, M.: Open Up: A Survey on Open and Non-anonymized Peer Reviewing, https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201905.0098.v2, 2019. 
Bolin, B.: A history of the science and politics of climate change: the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ISBN 0521880823, 2007. 
De Vries, D. R., Marschall, E. A., and Stein, R. A.: Exploring the peer review process: what is it, does it work, and can it be improved?, Fisheries, 34, 270–279, 2009. 
Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., and Leiserowitz, A.: Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement, Nat. Clim. Change, 1, 462–466, 2011. 
Download
Short summary
Early-career scientists (ECSs) are rarely invited to act as peer reviewers. Participating in a group peer review of the IPCC Special Report on Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, PhD students spent more time reviewing than more established scientists and provided a similar proportion of substantive comments. By soliciting and including ECSs in peer review, the scientific community would reduce the burden on more established scientists and may improve the quality of that process.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint