the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Air pollution walk as an impact education tool for air quality sensitization in the global south
Debabrata Bej
Sandip Sankar Ghosh
Srijan Haldar
Arindam Roy
Abstract. Air pollution has become a serious matter of concern in the global south and a significant amount of funding has been used to create awareness of air pollution. The conventional method of sensitization relies on workshops where slide-based presentations, images, plots and graphs are shown to the participants. However, sensitization about air quality using such an audio-visual format might not be sufficient to create adequate impact. Here in this study, we propose a new sensitization technique, the pollution walk, where participants and a subject matter expert will walk through different urban micro-environments with live air quality monitor. A pilot involving three such pollution walks with 24 participants were conducted in a south Asian megacity and pre and post-ante survey were conducted. The results indicate a greater sense of understanding among the participants and multidisciplinary nature of the air pollution problem has been well communicated. To understand the long-term impact, a survey after one year has been done which clearly indicates high levels of awareness and behavioural changes among the participants.
- Preprint
(1133 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(337 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Debabrata Bej et al.
Status: open (until 22 Dec 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on gc-2023-3', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Nov 2023
reply
This manuscript presents a novel approach for creating awareness related to air pollution — an important problem in India. Air pollution experts walk with participants with an air pollution sensor in tow and educate the participants about various facets of indoor and outdoor air quality. Even though this approach was only tested on 24 participants over 3 walks, the methods seems robust and the findings are interesting and should be scalable in cities around the world.
Some comments:
- The use of “Global South” in the title is not justified in my opinion. There is not enough discussion in the paper on the similarities (or lack thereof) within the Global South. What about “Air pollution walk as an impact education tool for air quality sensitization: A pilot from an Indian megacity”. A title which is generalized too much (e.g., “Global South”, “South Asia”, or even no region in title implying universality), needs to then include discussion in the text on those (implied) extrapolations.
- There is no discussion on the language(s) used during the walk and its implications. I think including this discussion with the reflections, challenges faced, best approaches, etc. will be helpful for others trying to emulate the approach used by the authors.
- Use “particulate matter” (PM) instead of particulate or particulates throughout the manuscript.
- Page 2, Line 73: Source for population is missing
- Page 4, Line 135: “improves indoor air quality” (since ventilation is also defined for outdoors)
- Page 12, Line 346: “Air apocalypse” is not a scientific term and simpler language may be better suited in my opinion.
- Some formatting issues (See page 11, Line 324; Page 13, Line 351)
Thanks to the authors for writing an interesting article and describing an approach which I hope is replicated widely
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-2023-3-RC1
Debabrata Bej et al.
Supplement
Debabrata Bej et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
99 | 24 | 3 | 126 | 11 | 2 | 1 |
- HTML: 99
- PDF: 24
- XML: 3
- Total: 126
- Supplement: 11
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 1
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1