<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" specific-use="SMUR" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GCD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Geoscience Communication Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GCD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Commun. Discuss.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2569-7439</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name></publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gc-2018-11</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>What even is &lt;q&gt;Climate&lt;/q&gt;?</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bothe</surname>
<given-names>Oliver</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6257-8786</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Institute of Coastal Research, Max-Planck-Strasse 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>13</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2018</volume>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>18</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2018 Oliver Bothe</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://gc.copernicus.org/preprints/gc-2018-11/">This article is available from https://gc.copernicus.org/preprints/gc-2018-11/</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://gc.copernicus.org/preprints/gc-2018-11/gc-2018-11.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gc.copernicus.org/preprints/gc-2018-11/gc-2018-11.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>&lt;p&gt;Although the concept of climate is easy to understand, there is not any uncontroversial definition of it. Most definitions fall back to the simple formulation that &lt;q&gt;climate is the statistics of weather&lt;/q&gt;. Recent attempts at a definition called versions of this saying vague. Climate is policy-relevant, and discussions on climate and climate change benefit from clarity on the topic. Beyond the policy relevance a definition should also be valid for scientific purposes and for individual views. It has to account for a general concept and individual instances of climate. Here, I try to highlight why the flexibility and the immediacy of the colloquial definition fit the topic. This defence shifts the lack of a clear definition towards the term &lt;q&gt;weather&lt;/q&gt; and the time-scales separating weather and climate.&lt;/p&gt;</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="18"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>